Excerpt coming from Only the Materials Review phase:
Outbreak Flu Impact on Ethics in Nursing Practice
Pandemic influenza: A books review
The dire circumstance of a outbreak flu probably will strike fear in the cardiovascular of many healthcare workers, whatever the level of their experience and knowledge. The 2009-2010 flu season helped bring additional awareness of the issue. 208 countries “had confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1 2009 and [stated] that over 13, 000 people had passed away as a immediate result” (Stroschein 2010). Although the death cost was not since great because feared, concerns regarding how to manage a pandemic and the need for immunization were brought to the forefront of the public mind and the concerns of health care workers.
Anticipation of a outbreak are not restricted to the general public at large. In fact , “one of the moral issues identified in response to a possible outbreak is health care workers’ responsibility to provide care during a communicable disease break out. Healthcare workers may be subject to a variety of job obligations under such circumstances. Questions of duty to take care of remain controversial, and issue continues for the ethical articulation of a responsibility to treat” (Shabanowitz Reardon 2009). To incentivize rns to permission to put their lives in danger to treat individuals, measures consist of making healthcare workers the “first to receive vaccine, in the event that one becomes available; first to obtain antiviral medicines; additional support for personal/family needs; additional life/disability coverage for family dangerous duty pay out; personal defensive equipment and training; [and] specialized training for dealing with cruel infectious diseases” (Shabanowitz Reardon 2009). This involves a financial as well as a moral expenditure by social institutions inside the lives of healthcare workers. Works must also be prepared for coping with the personal mental fallout of your epidemic, along with logistical problems.
Despite new scares regarding avian and swine flu, the knowledge level amongst the average person remains fairly low regarding the risks of influenza. In a single survey, “33% of respondents reported that although they got heard of the term pandemic autorevolezza, they did certainly not know what it meant, and 25% reacted they had under no circumstances heard of pandemic flu” (Shabanowitz Reardon 2009). This may be exacerbated with the problem of keeping the public well-informed regarding patterns from the spread from the disease and morbidity, which can be difficult to forecast. During the 2009 pandemic, highest-risk groups included patients with existing health conditions that made them weak, pregnant women, and asthmatics. Young adults were for higher risk of contracting the 2009 flu. “The paradox associated with the 2009 outbreak… is… you are much less likely to be attacked at all, the older you get; but since you do receive infected and then you’re old, you may have a higher probability of not doing so well out of it” (Manos 2009).
Outbreak flu would have a significant influence not just after