Home » fitness and health » discovering micrococcus luteus essay

Discovering micrococcus luteus essay

There are many reasons for establishing the identity of a microorganism. The reasons range from the knowing the causative agent of the disease in a patient, to be able to know how it is usually treated, to knowing the accurate microorganism being used for making sure foods or antibiotics. Lab scientists can easily isolate, identify, and determine the anti-bacterial susceptibility style. Some strategies that are used in laboratory adjustments are: the utilization of microscopy be it using wet mounts or stains, macroscopic antigen diagnosis, cultures, and susceptibility assessment.

When using microscopy strategies, wet supports don’t require the use of stains or perhaps dyes because the micro organism is usually large and/or motile. Microbes that aren’t huge and/or motile are stained. Without discoloration, bacteria are difficult to imagine. “Gram discoloration is the most useful stain treatment, for the truth that it distinguishes between microorganisms with heavy peptidoglycan cellular walls, which can be gram-positive, and those with thin peptidoglycan cellular walls and outer membranes that melt with alcoholic beverages or acetone, these becoming gram-negative, (Fauci, 2009).

 Macroscopic antigen detection is utilized to identify bacterias by means of their protein antigen.

Cultures will be collected to get bacterial remoteness; this depends on the use of unnatural media that may support microbe growth, a good example being a nutritional agar. Susceptibility testing allows the medical doctor to choose antimicrobial agents and also identify potential infection-control concerns. The purpose of this study was to apply all the methods which have been learned so far in the microbiology laboratory category for the identification of unknown bacterias. Materials and Methods

A mystery labeled #1 was given away by the research laboratory instructor. The strategy that have been discovered thus far intended for identifying bacteria have been applied to this unidentified. The first procedure that needed to be done was to execute a gram stain to determine if the unknown was gram-positive or perhaps gram-negative, this will also determine the unknown’s morphology. The second process that must be done was going to streak a bi-plate made up of MacConkey agar on one area and Blood vessels agar on the reverse side.

The third treatment that needed to be done was to streak the unknown on a Chemical Agar platter, using the zig-zag streak technique described in the lab manual. Once the chastity of a colony has been verified by the staining procedure, skin cells can then be utilized in a clean and sterile medium to start a pure culture. After determining the gram reaction, specific biochemical tests were performed. Since unknown #1 was determined to be gram-positive cocci, a Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) test was performed and the organism was inoculated and streaked onto a plate. Along with the inoculation and transfer onto a great agar slat. The dishes and slants were every single incubated for 37ƒ for 24 hours. Results

Gram Stain

Positive, dark blue/violet, cocci

MacConkey Agar

negative

Blood Agar agar

great

Chemical Agar

Soft, clean, yellow growth

Nutritional Agar Slant

Smooth, smooth, yellowish growth

Mannitol Salt Agar

Positive, yellowish colonies

Unidentified #1 experienced the following morphology after gram staining: darker blue or violet coloured cocci, pairs, tetrads, and irregular groupings. Unknown #1 had the following morphology on the Nutrient Agar agar plate and slant: gentle, smooth, and forms shiny yellow colonies. Unknown #1 had the subsequent characteristics intended for the blood agar: positive that contain a remarkable bright yellow-colored pigment. Not known #1 had a negative consequence for the MacConkey agar agar. After identifying that it was gram-positive cocci, a MSA test was performed and it absolutely was inoculated upon mannitol sodium agar and onto agar agar slant. The inoculated MSA showed up confident for arsenic intoxication acids. The colonies show a yellowish pigment. Conversation & Realization:

The purpose of this kind of study was going to apply all the methods which were learned to date in the microbiology laboratory school for the identification of unknown bacteria. After a number of differential assessments, it was figured unknown #1 was Micrococcus luteus. Following performing the Gram discoloration to determine that the unknown was gram-positive cocci, the affected person was grown on a Nutritional Agar dish and then a great agar slant for use in inoculating the rest of the biochemical tests. Each of the biochemical testing worked well aside from the MacConkey agar. That gave a negative result which is conclusive with M. luteus. This was identified since it experienced no color change. When the MSA was inoculated with unknown #1, it showed a yellow-colored pigment which is a characteristic of M. luteus. The nutrient agar platter and slant also made the same yellow-colored colonies, that happen to be also qualities of Meters. luteus.

“The origin of name to get M. luteus happens to be gold yellow, correlating to the nest characteristics, (Alderson, 2011).  Micrococcus are aerobic microorganisms, meaning that they thrive in an oxygen rich environment. This may also grow well in environments with little drinking water or excessive salt concentrations. “Micrococcus is generally present in the indigenous microflora of the skin, also in the mucous walls such as the nasal cavities, the top respiratory tract, plus the lining from the mouth, (Engelkirk, & Duben-Engelkrik, 2008).  Can also be found in dust, soil, and the atmosphere we breathe in. Considered a great opportunistic pathogen. Patients who have are immunocompromised with devastating underlying illnesses have to be worried about these bacteria. It’s also been known to be in charge of causing nosocomial infections.

“On rare situations, M. luteus has been connected with catheter-related bacteremia, pneumonia endocarditis, meningitis and septic arthritis, (Engelkirk, & Duben-Engelkirk, 2008).  “Patients who acquire catheter-related bacteremia have the pursuing signs and symptoms: tachypnea, shaking chills, a heat spike, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, (Beers, & Berkow, 1999).  Pneumococcal endocarditis can result from the bacteremia. “It provides the following signs and symptoms: low grade fever, nighttime sweats, fatigability, malaise, fat loss, and valvular insufficiency.

Cured with penicillin G 10 to 20 mil U/day IV for 4 weeks, (Beers, & Berkow, 1999).  “The signs and symptoms of meningitis really are a prodromal respiratory system illness or sore throat typically precedes the fever, pain, stiff neck, and throwing up. To treat, make use of Vancomycin and ceftriaxone and ampicillin, (Beers, & Berkow, 1999).  “Finally the signs and symptoms for septic osteoarthritis are: moderate to serious joint discomfort, warmth, pain, and constrained motion.

First antibiotic assortment depends on age, past background, extra-articular infection, and fluid Gram discolor findings, (Beers, & Berkow, 1999).  In hostipal wards, the bacteria can be sent by clinic staff who may have failed to rinse their hands properly by going from one patient to a new. The main transmission path is direct or indirect exposure to contaminated individuals or things. It can be avoided by using the proper handwashing methods. Overall you’re free to learn every one of the steps instructed to identify unknown bacteria. Abilities could be better improved by practicing in different unknowns to see if you’re free to identify these people better.

References

Alderson, G. M. (2011). Tests & research laboratory techniques. (13 Ed., pg. 333). Southlake, Texas: Fountainhead Press. Sodas, M. They would., & Berkow, R. (1999). The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy (17th ed. ). Whitehouse Place, N. J: Merck Exploration Laboratories. Engelkirk, P. G., & Duben-Engelkirk, J. L. (2008). Gram Positive Cocci. In Laboratory diagnosis of contagious diseases: Basics of diagnostic microbiology (p. 216). Baltimore: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Fauci, A. S. (2009). Harrison’s manual of medicine (17th ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical.

1

< Prev post Next post >