Field Marshal Haig: “Hero or Butcher of the Somme”
I consider the field marshal as being a butcher and a leading man for several reasons. Even though the insinuation of Haig like a butcher neglects many benefits that he possessed, the implication of him like a hero also neglects downsides that the discipline marshal gets. Although the winning of the war had come at the sacrifice of a multitude of soldiers, we must remember that the general had achieved his main objective regardless if it had been accomplished in the most gruesome methods.
This dissertation will take a look at reasons which in turn voice out opinions that support both arguments and my own. A single explanation of Haig becoming described as a butcher is the ineffectiveness plus the inadequacy of his programs and plans. Wires are not being slice and cell phone messages were intercepted. This can be explicitly depicted in supply 7, as it describes just how “hundreds of dead were strung away (on barbed wire) just like wreckage washed up to a excessive water tag.
” This kind of view is usually further supported and described in resource 12 while Churchill stocks his problems on the fact that “we never have gained within a month’s struggling with as much ground as we were expected to gain in two hours” which “we have never advanced two miles within a direct line at any point. “
Although the over sources discuss the futility of his tactics origin as it details how the “barbed wire is never so well minimize, nor the artillery plans so comprehensive. ” But as this source was written by field marshal Haig we must be weary of the reality it the report might have been biased within a desperate make an attempt to keep his job. A different source that contradicts the aforementioned source can be source 6 which is also authored by Haig. He writes about the “very successful assault this morning” and how the attack “all went just like clockwork”. However as the writer was Haig not necessarily a completely trusted source.
One more for Haig’s portrayal as being a butcher is definitely his obviously uncaring and disrespectful frame of mind towards his soldiers. This kind of view can be conveyed in source eight as “his men occupied muddy, noisy trenches” suffering “Haig slept in a comfortable bed in a quiet country chateaux and dined within the best foodstuff available. ” Another shared analysis on this is indicated in source 11 where it horrendously explains the poor living conditions for the solders. These were “stinking, ragged, unshaven and sleepless” which illustrates quite well how plunging and appalling the conditions in the trenches were.
This time supply 18 contradicts source almost eight as it highlights that “altogether, four English lieutenant generals, twelve major-generals died or were wiped out. ” These facts present that “whatever else the generals had been doing, we were holding not soaking in comfortable chateaux. “
The very last reason the field marshal was depicted as a butcher was his seemingly ready approach to sacrifice men without the slightest piece of remorse or perhaps hesitation. In source 13 it lets us know that “we are gradually killing off of the best of you population of those islands” then asks all of us if we have enough money “to continue paying the same sort of value for the same kind of gain? ” This implies that Haig is usually murdering the best soldiers devoid of gaining any use.
His actions had been justified in source seventeen where he talks about his methods. He writes that “the object of all war can be victory and a defensive attitude can never bring this about. ” He also further says that within a war “losses were guaranteed to be large for the two sides” which conveys it turned out not his fault pertaining to the mass of casualties in the conflict.
Haig really should not be dismissed as being a villain at this time because we certainly have not mentioned a crucial point. In source 16 this noticeably states “if the criterion of any successful basic is to succeed wars. Haig must be judged a success. The price of victory was appalling, yet Haig’s armed service methods had been in line with the ideas of time, when regret was the approach all sides used to achieve triumph. ” As all sides were using the same policy of attrition the British are not the only armed service that received a high injury rate as probably a great many other countries performed as well.
In addition “by the finish of 1918, the United kingdom army was your only military that maintained its well-being and we hadn’t been hit by mutiny (like the French) or military defeat (like the Germans). This illustrates Haig as an inspirational leader as the military had managed to maintain all their morale through the war and no soldier got betrayed their very own country. In source 19 it is written “although generals made errors, the army had extended very quickly and in addition they learnt rapidly. Haig fantastic generals might not exactly have been they that the Uk army has ever made but they had been pretty good, and did their utmost. ” This kind of proves that Haig, although was not the very best of leaders, was still hardworking and continually tried hard to achieve victory.
Although having been a good leader supply 22 even now contradicts origin 19 using its description with the British being “Lion led by Donkeys”. This implies that the British officers were clueless and would not know what these people were doing. Resource 20 disagrees with this kind of as it creates how “at the end of the war Haig and the other folks were characters. The view of those as “donkeys” only came out later. “This implies that their very own primary effect towards Haig differed just after the battle when his tactics acquired come being doubted.
1
