Excerpt from Term Paper:
In her eyes, supporting religion was tantamount to supporting oppression.
Cut to a new scene together with the same woman, in my senior high school cafeteria. Right now we are sitting down side-by-side, talking like good friends. She covers how forced she feels simply by her family to enter the field of law, although she would opt to study anything more meaningful than political science when ever she visits college. The girl criticizes members of our generation for not caring about what will go on in the world, and each of our lack of social responsibility.
Incongruously, it is the people of my personal faith community that seem to have utilized their belief as a touchstone of sociable activism to talk and to support others. A concerned involvement in the point-of-view of other folks, and a desire to help them is the essence of the selflessness of faith, in fact it is also the essence in the dispassionate however personally targeted and aggressive discipline of psychology.
I really believe it is because faith has been made by our culture as intolerant, or while hostile to thought, that people in my age bracket tend to reject the concept of hope. The ideas and ideas of both equally religion and psychology can be used for adverse purposes, yet that does not signify the procedures themselves are awful. Psychology and science need to stop trying to seal religion and faith away, especially while people articulate the need for a far more meaningful life than current cultural circumstances offer them, yet likewise religion must admit the ability of science and psychology to aid and to recover, whether it is through surgery, psychotropic medication , or maybe traditional therapy.
Critical Reflection
Even if the disciplines of the social and organic sciences aren’t hostile towards the pursuit of man truth, what you should make of the simple fact that our tradition has polarized these two causes in such a way that they can be seen as antagónico? Doesn’t the fact that they are viewed as incompatible make a difference have an effect after their capability to heal people seeking truth and understanding? For examine, imagine a Goth young adult walking to a therapist’s business office, complaining about her school and just how family does not understand her, and how the people at her school with home are false and superficial. Dealing with this girl with therapy on her depression, or more negative manners like self-harm, with Intellectual Behavioral methods, antidepressants, and other medications together to a even more spiritual strategy, while still taking her questions of ‘why am I here’ seriously might be the ideal approach, relating to Entwistle’s text. Which indeed might be the case within an ideal universe. However , there is a problem with the cultural resistance that might come up in the women’s mind, the moment she hears about psychic concepts, considering the fact that she affiliates faith with indoctrination and conversion. The therapist, by simply broaching the main topic of spirituality, may well completely alienate the girl from your therapeutic process.
Also, what transpires once faith and religion are indeed at probabilities? Although Entwistle’s advice seems useful for someone coming from a generous theological environment and politics orientation, every time a patient experiencing bipolar disorder needs medical care, attempting to generate greater the usage between his biological treatment and the proper care of his soul might be hard for his traditional, Christian, conservative parents to understand. Dealing with the ailment strictly like a physical illness might be necessary to make sure that his father and mother and the son accept the medication this individual needs to support his condition, if that they view counseling as hostile to their trust.
Action will begin reading technology section of the newspaper more often. No joke – in a technology illiterate traditions, as our bait is often accused of being, despite our reliability upon technology, it is essential to understand the scientific paradigm and approach to seeing the world, as well as literary, philosophical, and theological methods. Believers must come to determine themselves because potential scientists, before they will expect scientists to take all of them seriously while believers. Also, I will make an effort my far better to call in question the currently popular notion of the cultural warfare between perception and reason
