Kate Oliver’s examination of Flannery O’Connor’s “Good Country People” claims that Joy-Hulga’s physical symbolizes her emotional impairments. By entering detail from the context of O’Connor’s first short account, Kate Oliver is able to call and make an overall moderately strong debate of how she feels she is right in her analysis. Oliver is able to make a strong disagreement when the lady writes about Joy-Hulga’s psychological detachment and artificial values, yet could have went into more information instead of staying so hazy with her examples and correlations in regards to show how she was blind to reality.
O’Connor’s first short story takes place on a Southern farm building in the middle 1950’s. This was a time when Christianity was obviously a strong belief in the Southern region and when everyone was more relying in the other person. Oliver the point to show how Joy-Hulga’s physical impairments symbolize her clear interior lacks with regards to emotion, truth, and morals.
Oliver argues that Joy-Hulga’s weakened heart is intended to symbolize her emotional distance, her eye glasses show how she is impaired to fact, and her artificial calf symbolizes her artificial morals. Each one of her physical impairments is met using a deeper emotional impairment.
Oliver believes that Joy-Hulga’s weakened heart symbolizes her mental absence in terms of loving other folks. She could make a strong argument out of this simply by elaborating about Joy-Hulga’s beliefs degree, her lack of friends, and her nonexistent romantic relationship with her mother. By simply Oliver saying “However her weak center symbolizes her emotional detachment – a great inability to love any individual or anything” (234), this shows her main point of her whole argument in this portion of her examination. O’Connor then simply correlates to this in her article simply by her utilization of “she didn’t like puppies or cats or birds or bouquets or characteristics or wonderful young men” (3). This kind of supports the fact that Joy-Hulga really only doesn’t have virtually any love or perhaps emotion to any other life. Kate Oliver was able to generate her debate about this section of the story quite strong due to the fact with the direct interrelation between her analysis as well as the facts which can be shown in O’Connor’s unique short story.
Another point Oliver makes is definitely how Joy-Hulga’s artificial leg symbolizes her artificial morals, or much better how her having simply no real lower leg shows just how she has simply no beliefs. The writer is able to additional make this point by proclaiming, “Religion would have provided Joy-Hulga with religious and emotional support, a so-called true leg where to restore her lifestyle. Instead, Joy-Hulga revels in her denial of God” (Oliver 236). This is focused by many excerpts from O’Connor’s original brief story which include, “My child is an atheist and won’t allow me to keep the Holy bible in the parlor” (4). This quote can further support Oliver’s assert with Joy-Hulga not having virtually any real beliefs and rejecting the thought of an increased power. Kate Oliver was able to show just how her assumptions were validated in her analysis simply by directly relating many of her points to O’Connor’s original brief story, exactly where it is clearly shown that she has simply no religious morals.
Lastly, Oliver writes about how exactly Joy-Hulga’s eyeglasses show how she is sightless to fact. Oliver will go in the right direction with this state, yet could have made a far stronger argument with completely she eliminated into more detail with just how she was. Oliver stated, “But she actually is blind to reality, having knowledge just of ebooks and fuzy ideas, rather than of people and concrete objects” (234). Oliver’s claim will correlate with O’Connor’s original story, but she could have shown much more elements of just how she was blind to reality by elaborating more on the discussions Joy-Hulga experienced with her mother and Manley Tip, and with how Joy-Hulga was perceived/acted in the original story. O’Connor’s original brief story browse, “with the look of someone who got achieved blindness by an act of will and means to keep it” (1), although this kind of quote really does support Oliver’s claim about Joy-Hulga becoming blind to reality, this shows it in more of a complex sense in which Oliver didn’t. Oliver’s argument was overall fragile in this a part of her article, but with a bit more detail and reference to the initial short history it could had been a very good and safeguarded argument.
General Kate Oliver was able to produce fairly strong point with her article through her usage of examples through relating Joy-Hulga’s internal and external concerns to one another. If perhaps she could correlate more of the details from O’Connor’s original short account, Oliver could have turned her fairly strong point in a very strong point with her analysis of “Good Region People. ” Although Oliver did have one weak point in her document when the lady talks about Joy-Hulga’s blindness to reality, she was able to more than make up for this with her details and examples when she published about her emotional distance and her artificial beliefs.
Works Mentioned
O’Connor, Flannery. “Good Region People. ” ENGL 1101. Course D2L Page. East Georgia Point out College, Fall 2013. PDF FILE file. 21 Oct. 2013.
Oliver, Kate. “O’Connor’s Good Country People. ” Explicator 62. four (2004): 233-236
Literary Reference Centre. Web. 11 September 2013
Writing the Article Analysis Composition
Once you have accomplished the “Article Analysis Worksheet” and have read the “Sample Content Analysis, ” you may find it useful to compose your personal outline before starting your article. Outlining the essay will make sure that the article is well-structured and that you have sufficient evidence to back up your promises. Fill out the Outline beneath before you begin producing your tough draft (the information for each section ought to be based on the “Suggested Document Analysis Outline” above.
I actually. Introduction
a. Kate Oliver’s analysis of Flannery O’Connor’s “Good Country People” claims that Joy-Hulga’s physical defects can be a symbolization of her emotional impairments.
b. By going into details of the context of O’Connor’s original brief story, Kate Oliver is able to make an general moderately strong argument showing how she feels she is correct in her evaluation.
c. Oliver is able to make an extremely strong disagreement when the girl writes about her emotional detachment and artificial values, yet would have went into more detail and shown more examples when it came to display how the lady was sightless to fact.
II. History and Presentation Article’s Data (present evidence objectively; note: be sure to frequently name mcdougal of the document so that it is apparent that these concepts belong to the first author) a. In O’Connor’s original brief story happens on a Southern farm in the mid 1950’s. This was a time when Christianity was a good belief in the South then when people were even more trusting in each other. n. Oliver the point to show how Joy-Hulga’s physical impairments symbolize her clear interior lacks when it comes to emotion, actuality, and philosophy. c. Joy-Hulga’s weak heart is meant to represent her emotional detachment, her eyeglasses show how the girl with blind to reality, and her manufactured leg signifies her unnatural beliefs.
3. Analysis of Evidence
1 . (subjective analysis begins here)
a. Oliver believes that Joy-Hulga’s weakened heart is a symbol of her mental lacks when it comes to loving others.
m. She uses evidence from O’Connor’s initial story (in the estimate below) to correlate with her claim.
c. “However her weak heart signifies her mental detachment – an incapability to like anyone or perhaps anything” (234)
m. She was able to make a powerful argument out of this by simply elaborating about Joy-Hulga’s viewpoint degree, her lack of close friends, and her nonexistent romantic relationship with her mother.
e. “she didn’t just like dogs or cats or perhaps birds or flowers or nature or nice young men. “
f. This supports the fact that Joy-Hulga really only doesn’t have virtually any lover for just about any living pets.
g. She surely could make a solid argument by simply directly relating her claim to O’Connor’s tale.
IV. Examination of Evidence 2
a. Another point Oliver makes is just how Joy-Hulga’s man-made leg is a symbol of her unnatural beliefs, or perhaps better yet just how her having no genuine leg displays how this wounderful woman has no morals.
m. Her proof is good in her analysis.
c. “Religion would have supplied Joy-Hulga with spiritual and emotional support, a alleged real calf on which to rebuild her life. Instead, Joy-Hulga revels in her rejection of God” (236).
m. This proof is good because it really does clearly state in O’Connor’s original account that Hulga has no sort of religion. Therefore her lack of a lower leg can be given to her not enough
faith.
elizabeth. “My girl is an atheist and won’t i want to keep the Scriptures in the parlor” (4)
f. This kind of quote facilitates Oliver’s assert because it also states that Joy-Hulga obviously has no sort of religion.
g. Kate Oliver was able to put even more meaning in her research by directly relating it to O’Connor’s original history.
V. Research of Facts 3
a. Lastly, Oliver produces about how Joy-Hulga’s eyeglasses display how the girl with blind to reality.
b. Oliver is going the right way with this claim, but could have produced a much better argument with it had the lady gone into more detail.
c. “But she is blind to fact, having understanding only of books and abstract suggestions, rather than of people and concrete floor objects” (234).
m. Oliver declare does associate with O’Connor’s original history, yet the girl could have entered a lot more fine detail with how she was blind to reality simply by elaborating even more on the discussions Joy-Hulga experienced with her mother and Manley.
e. “with the look of somebody who had achieved blindness by simply an action of is going to and means to keep it”(1).
f. Although this kind of quote truly does support Oliver’s claim regarding Joy-Hulga getting blind to reality, this shows this in more of a complex sense in which Oliver didn’t.
g. Oliver’s argument was overall poor in this part of her document, but with a little more detail it could have been a really strong argument.
VI. Bottom line
a. Overall Kate Oliver surely could make pretty strong point with her document through her use of illustrations and by relating Joy-Hulga’s internal and external problems to each other.
m. If your woman was able to assimialte more of the particulars from O’Connor’s original short story, Oliver could have flipped her fairly strong point in a very strong level with her analysis of “Good Region People. “
c. Oliver surely could make an extremely strong debate when the girl wrote regarding her psychological detachment and artificial philosophy, yet would have went into greater detail and proven more illustrations when it came to demonstrate how your woman was window blind to reality.
Active Browsing Worksheet: Document Analysis
Title of primary source (short story): Flannery O’Connor: Good Region People
Title of article: O’Connor’s Good Country People
Article Publisher: Kate Oliver
Content Place & date of publication: Explicator 62. some (2004)
Component 1: Understanding the primary supply
List the characters:
Protagonist(s): Joy-Hulga
Antagonist(s): Manley Pointer
What is the social or perhaps historical framework of the history (in different words, what “real world” issues is Flannery O’Connor responding to)? It takes place on a the southern area of farm in the mid 1954s whenever Christianity was big and when everyone was trusting in each other.
List the clashes in this account (internal and/or external): Happiness has many inside conflicts having to do with her trust, blindness to reality, and her view of nothingness in the world. Some external issues are her and her mother’s marriage, and her trusting in Manley Tip yet him leaving her legless and visionless in the barn.
Precisely what is the climaxing of the story? (note: the climax is among the most exciting and emotional level of a history; it generally occurs near to the end) The climax to the story can be whenever Manley and Happiness were in the barn and he usually takes her artificial leg and glasses.
What goes on during the image resolution of the account?
Joy is left in the barn with literally nothing at all; no calf and no spectacles. Her emotional nothingness is matched with actual physical nothingness.
How are the conflict, climax and resolution related to the story’s historical or perhaps social framework? It implies that Manley had not been a “good Christian boy” and that people couldn’t often be trusted.
Component 2: Assessing the Article
Precisely what is the writer’s main point/thesis about the story?
Olivers main stage was demonstrating how Joy’s physical impairments symbolized her emotional impairments.
List at least 3 specific examples that the writer uses to support her or his primary point.
1) How her weak cardiovascular symbolizes her emotional distance.
2) How her glasses show how she is window blind to actuality.
3) How her unnatural leg is a symbol of artificial philosophy.
Are the writer’s ideas regarding the short story consistent with your individual? Explain. I do believe that Oliver did have got a strong disagreement in concerning how each of her physical defects were matched with a great emotional problem, by entering detail your woman was able to produce a very solid argument showing how.
What information do you have that challenges the author’s argument? Does they accurately indicate the content with the literary textual content being analyzed? If certainly not, please describe. Oliver truly does reflect the content of the fictional text, the lady uses just things in her theory that are explicitly stated in the initial story.
Does the article expose any rival viewpoints? In the event that so , those that? If not really, what refutation may be possible for their disagreement? It doesn’t present any opposition viewpoints, although she could have went into greater detail with her examples when it arrived at how Joy was blind to reality, and she could have correlated it more to O’Connor’s original short story.
In the space listed below, write a thesis statement pertaining to an analysis of the article. Your thesis statement includes an EVALUATION with the article, in addition to a clear feeling of the DIRECTION your essay will take. Oliver is able to make a strong discussion when the girl writes regarding Joy-Hulga’s emotional detachment and artificial beliefs, yet could have entered more details instead of being thus vague with her cases and correlations when it came to display how the girl was blind to fact.
You may also be thinking about the following: good people examination
you
