Home » essay » shelter kuan yew essay

Shelter kuan yew essay

1 ) Historical Qualifications of the Head

Lee Kuan Yew came to be a British subject matter in in Kampong Java Road Singapore on Sept 16, 1923. He was delivered to Shelter Chin Koon, an English-educated and an english subject, and Chua John Neo. He previously three siblings and a sister namely, Dennis Shelter, who was in a position to put up a law firm with Shelter Kuan Yew called Shelter & Lee, Freddy Lee, a stockbroker, Lee Suan Yew, whom read medicine at the School of Cambridge, and Monica Lee.

Shelter Kuan Yew got married to Kwa Geok Choo about September 35, 1950. They had two kids, Lee Hsien Loong, who became a first-rate Minister in Singapore, and Lee Hsien Yang, who was a former Chief executive and Ceo of SingTel. They also a new daughter called Lee Wei Ling, who have runs the National Neuroscience Institute.

This individual first studied at Telok Kurau Primary School, which in turn he perceived as a school in whose primary pupils were poor and not as bright and advantaged.

He moved to Raffles Organization, where he was challenged because he was encircled with the best 150 pupils in Singapore. Despite this, this individual still worked to get into the best of his class. In the junior season, he studied in Cambridge where he could receive scholarships and leading position intended for the School Certificate examinations. Lee also received a scholarship grant for Raffles College (National University of Singapore) in which he obtained the most notable student placement for equally Singapore and Malaya. When the Japanese arrived in Singapore, Lee’s university education was postponed. He employed this time to understand Japanese and work as a clerk in a textile adding company. This individual also set up his personal business where he manufactured letter head glue. If the war done, Lee continued his studies in London Institution of Economics and soon after moved to School of Cambridge. Here, he took up regulation at Fitzwilliam College and graduated with a double Top class Honors, an award that may be rarely received.

After trying out his graduate degree, this individual returned to Singapore to work as a legal representative. He was presented a job in John Laycock’s law firm, which in turn he dished up as a legal advisor towards the trade and students’ union. He as well worked because anelection agent for the organization, and this can be where he encountered politics. Ultimately, he was capable of work can be way to the top and he started to be the initial Prime Minister of Singapore on 06 3, late 1950s. During his term, he was able to help to make third world region, Singapore, into a first universe country. one particular

2 . Application of Edwin Locke’s Framework

three or more. Leadership Variations

Covey’s Transformational versus Transactional

Lee Kuan Yew was more of a life changing leader. This individual involved changing the organization as well as its members for the best. He determined his subordinates to improve “higher level goals that allegedly surpasse their personal interests. This individual shaped and drove Singapore’s development, catapulting the city-state from another World backwater, to the the front ranks in the First Community. An example with this would be when he wanted to lower down the lack of employment rate. This individual decided that change was necessary and in addition they specifically had to get production sectors organized in Singapore then delivered back to America.

This lead to them running and exporting inside months, which solved their particular unemployment problem. Another example would be the time when he influenced the polyglot population to be the mental and specialized center in the region. This resulted then to learning to be a major gamer in the foreign economic industry. Lee Kuan Yew was able to transform Singapore drastically by simply appealing to his followers’ beliefs and sense of higher purpose to do his eye-sight for a fresh and increased Singapore. He was also in a position to align his vision consequently with his supporters, which can be observed in a testimony saying Lee has established a tiny tropical isle of three million who have constantly try to improve.

Schmidt and Tannebaum’s Continuum

Lee Kuan Yew’s style is getting close to the Laissez Faire command. He shares decision-making with group associates specifically cupboard and party members, authorities, the people of Singapore and others and works together with them alongside (Dubrin ou al., 2006). 8 This individual cannot be depicted wholly being a Laissez Faireleader due to the fact that although he views other individuals opinions, nevertheless since he could be a Prime Minister, he has to make the final decisions. Shelter Kuan Yew also permits his visitors to take a political election on particular issues and make them make a decision the outcome. A good example for this will be him possessing a referendum on merger with Malaysia.

Blake and Mouton

There are people who believe that Lee Kuan Yew is a participative leader (Dubrin et ing, 2006, 75) since if he makes deicisions, he does so with a group of members and he works with them side by side. In this case, Lee’s group included his case and get together members, professionals he conferred with with, the people of Singapore and many others. It is difficult to flag point a unique subtype of participative management and he displays all three: Consultative, General opinion and Democratic. As Perfect Minister it is important to consider other people’s thoughts but typically he has the strength of making the ultimate decision. This is certainly called consultative leadership. A consensus leader will make an effort to have all members agree on a problem although in Lee’s circumstance, it is practically impossible and there is so many people engaged when making decisions on behalf of the nation.

A democratic leader is definitely one who takes a vote by using an issue to decide the outcome. The very best example of that in Lee’s case can be holding a referendum. 12 His large concern for folks is also seen in the riot between Malaysia and Singapore. The huge range ended with twenty-three deaths and hundreds injured so Lee appealed to the community to end the riot and severed ties with Malaysia (Wikipedia, 3 years ago, n. p). This shown his “utilitarianism approach to making decisions. He assumed that the merger with Malaysia was vital for Singapore’s survival although he observed that his people were displeased and that the condition could result in even more bloodshed so he made a decision that ending the Federation would be the most beneficial decision.

Situational Leadership and David Coleman’s Situations

Lee Kuan Yew is unquestionably has a coercive leadership style. Despite the fact that Singapore was in an emergency, he was capable to deal with a very difficult task that is certainly to transform a developing region into one from the world’s most developed countries. Through industrialization, Singapore was able towork her way up to the top.

Shelter Kuan Yew could also be viewed as having affiliation as his leadership style since he was able to devise a plan together with the Malayan Primary Minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman to merge the countries of Malaysia, Brunei and Singapore jointly to form a Federation in order to end British Colonial Rule, despite the fact that this union was short-lived.

4. Special Qualities

Bennis’ Attributes

Lee Kuan Yew owned a well guided vision. An illustration for this would be his eye-sight of greening the city in Singapore. Due to his perseverance he offers transformed Singapore to one with the greenest cities of the world. 13 Lee Kuan Yew likewise possessed interest. According to the past Malaysian Financial Minister Daim Zainuddin. He remains, some, passionate about Singapore, its people, its future and its particular relationship with its neighbors. That passion features driven him to make Singapore vibrant and relevant, and towards this he is focused on shaping the minds of young Singaporeans. This newest book brightens his convinced that is bound to increase discussions regarding the future of Singapore.

Covey’s Several Habits

Lee Kuan Yew was likewise believed to make proactive motions under his governance. Himself a lawyer, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew knows the importance of effective law enforcement officials and thorough administrative program. Under his leadership, the us government has been positive in growing high standards of public welfare and a quality environment with clean air, clean land, clean water as well as a control about noise pollution.

Aside from this, Lee Kuan Yew set his priorities right. He directed for Singapore’s economic and social expansion, which selection sure that the government delivered, regardless if it intended tough regulations such as the Property Acquisition Act. He as well prioritized nationhood and unity. He offered aquality living environment, irrespective of status, in conjunction with universal possessing. He thought this will contribute to the sense of equality inside the society. He even said in a speech “You can’t have this feeling without supplying all Singaporeans a spending green Singapore. Today, if you are in a smooth, executive condo or landed property, it can clean. An individual live similarly, but you are certainly not excluded in the public areas for everybody. 

Greenleaf’s Stalwart Leadership

Lee Kuan Yew was a prime ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) and a public servant. He places service prior to self-interest (Dubrin et approach, 2006, 69). He is concerned with developing his people’s well being and socioeconomic status, which included creating a better health and education standards. Lee is also believed to “listen initial to express confidence in others,  another attribute of your servant leader. He pays off attention for his in order to acquire observations to issues and problems in order to determine what actions he has to take to deal with these issues. Being a politician within a democratic society, this is essential because if Lee dismissed the requirements of his country he would have end up being overturned and lost electric power. A servant leader must be able to “inspire trust because they are trustworthy.  Lee created a foundation of trust early in his politics career.

He was able to correspond with his arrêters by explaining his personal party, Someones Action Party as, “beer-swilling bourgeois.  (Wikipedia, 2007, n. p) More importantly, he consistently provided on his guidelines. An example with this would be when he was identifying Singapore’s real estate problem and solving that. There was a shortage of casing so this individual organised housing to be created on authorities owned land and at the moment, 90% of Singaporeans personal their own house as cited by Beautiful, Elliot and Smith. (2005, p. 38). Lee Kuan Yew is usually considered a servant leader since this individual focuses on what is feasible to accomplish and concentrates on the most important issues which means a lot of will be neglected. As Excellent Minister, having been responsible for an entire country having a population of over several million so naturally, a lot of issues can be overlooked but he made certain that his people’s interests were positioned first wonderful three key concerns were national protection, the economy and social issues.

5. A conclusion and Significance for Company Effectiveness

Lee Kuan Yew is considered one of the most successful and exceptional leaders of our time. He is able to get in touch with people and identify with their very own goals and aspirations. He could be also reliable and this could be demonstrated in his track record of very good judgment. Smedinghoff (2004, p. 9) believes Lee displays excellent personality and this is shown through his ethics. He says that, “Lee Kuan Yew’s insistence about replicating his integrity was recognized when the Institute for National Advancement voted Singapore the least corrupt country in Asia, and the seventh least corrupt throughout the world.  His accomplishment and forty yr reign in Singapore’s political scene echoes for himself. It is noticeable that he can highly regarded by many people. Lee can be testimony to exhibit what hard work, perseverance and discipline can achieve. Lee Kuan Yew has achieved what many universe leaders think of and accomplished this without violence. He could be an example of a great exemplary head.

Reference:

AsiaOne. “Lee Kuan Yew: Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going.  AsiaOne. N. g., 9 Sept. 2011. Net. 25 November. 2013.

Chan, Robin the boy wonder. “Lee Kuan Yew: Rare Leader Who have Lived by simply His

Convictions. Singapolitics. N. s., 16 Sept. 2013. Net. 21 Nov. 2013. Drysdale, J. G. S. (1984). Singapore: Have difficulties for Success. Singapore: Times Catalogs International, g. 301. (Call No .: RSING 959. 57 DRY)

Edinger, Lewis. “The Comparative Analysis of Personal Leadership.  Comparative National politics 7. two (January 1975): 253-69

Family (Lee, Lee Kuan Yew (2000). From Third World to First. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish. )

Keng-Lian, Koh. “Singapore: Vision of Former Excellent Minister Lee Kuan Yew of the Yard City.  ESCAP Online Conference. Ryan Fook Kwang, Warren Fernandez and Sumiko Tan, in. d. Web. 21 November. 2013.

Kissinger, Henry. “Lee Kuan Yew.  Time 90. Time, twenty nine Apr. 2010. Web. twenty one Nov. 2013.

“Leadership Analysis ” Lee Kuan Yew.  A Student’s Guide to Leadership. N. l.

n. d. Web. 25 November. 2013.

“Lee Kuan Yew Interview Transcript.  Interview by Lorraine Hahn. Singapore Windowpane. N. s., 14 May well 2002. Net. 21 November. 2013.

Singapolitics. “Top Leaders Remember LKY’s Leadership Style.  AsiaOne. And. p., 16 Sept. 2013. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.

“The Planning of a City-State.  Proc. of Remarks simply by Mr Philip Ho, Chief of the City Redevelopment Authority at the Lee Kuan Yew and the Physical Transformation of Singapore Community Conference. In. p., 18 Sept. 2013. Web. twenty one Nov. 2013.

you

< Prev post Next post >