I feel like I have no choice but to be a cynic about our ability
to know the world within the sense knowledge given the information that is becoming
presented.
Our senses are touching, hearing, smelling and tasting, I think it is
quite possible that a person can think that they see, touch, and smell something
like a glass of bear yet there end up being no cup of beer present, consequently their
understanding of this goblet of beverage is phony. There is a good possibility that
this person is suffering from any of the numerous feasible sensations, auditory
visual or perhaps tactile, experienced without external stimulus and caused by mental
derangement, intoxication or fever, in other words your husband could be
hallucinating.
There are many ways in which the detects can be deceived into believing things
which are not true, an example is every time a person requires the drug LSD, phentermine is
one which alters the state of the mind and tricks this into creatively perceiving
points which are not really real just like pink elephants, green rats, gold skin and so
about. Hallucinations may well occur when pressure is usually applied to several sections
attracting different reactions from the person being damaged, these reactions are
brought on by the affected individual seeing things which they understand to be real.
Hallucinations are just one way with which the aesthetic perception of the object can easily
be improved there are many different options by which the visual notion of an subject
can be modified, for example think about a square cover, pay close attention
as to what you see at the time you look at this subject. If the envelope does not push but
you are doing then your perception of this subject will continually change whenever you move
regarding and the square envelope no longer looks sq .. Because a sq object
including an envelope cant become square but not square as well then the
visual perception with the object should be false.
One other false aesthetic perception might be a mirage, for example when you
lower a flat extend of road on a sizzling summer day it appears as though
you will discover patches of water on the highway up forward, as you get closer and closer
to where the drinking water appears to be that disappears. One other example can be
illusions with mirrors such as the ones that David Copperfield performs, in the
performances this individual astounds viewers by making that appear as if people are
floating about air.
In regards to the argument in section 11 of Philosophical Concerns and
Arguments I tend to believe premise one that states that we can sometimes
become mistaken inside our perceptual values, for example whenever we hallucinate our company is
mistaken within our perceptual though we may not really realize that at that particular
point in time. Regarding premise two I will not agree with that one, I dont
believe that it is always logically possible that our perceptual beliefs are
false additional wise we might all be hallucinating and I believe it is hard to seize that
great and vast amounts of people are hallucinating. As for the final premise and
the conclusion I am inclined to believe that they are false because they equally
relay on the second assumption being true.
It is said that seeing is usually believing but with hallucinations, optical
illusions and other false image perceptions developing without people even
recognizing it, you have got to wonder who have came up with the word seeing is definitely
believing and just how it could ever be possible that somebody could believe such a
ludicrous statement.
Category: Viewpoint
