You will discover twenty KSFs considered with this study. We were holding chosen by literature assessment. The KSFs are categorized into five stages of ERP rendering life pattern; namely: job preparation, technology selection, project formulation, implementation/development and application. To address the study objectives, a survey questionnaire was considered as the most appropriate study method. It absolutely was sent to seventy four companies which were implementing ERP system for at least one year. The respondents happen to be staff at management level, IT personnel and users involved in the expansion and use of the ERP system.
The study received 248 responses coming from 740 quesitionnaires that were delivered to the companies. To obtain the priority of KSFs on ERP rendering life routine, a quantitative analysis can be applied to recognize the weighting of KSFs toward ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING implementation accomplishment. The success of ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING implementation may be measured through five indications; namely: program quality, information quality, support quality, trickery impact and strategical impact. Based on the weighting of KSFs on each stage of ERP rendering life circuit, it is located that the connection is most crucial KSF in project planning stage (? 0.
664). As the strong ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING product (package selection) is most critical KSF on technology selection level (? sama dengan 0. 554). The alter management is quite critical KSF on project formulation stage (? sama dengan 0. 406), and on implementation/development stage, user training is considered the most critical KSF (? = 0. 422). This study is anticipated to improve know-how in ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING implementation, especially the role of KSF on each of your stage of ERP rendering life cycle. Keywords: Priority of KSFs, ERP Setup Success, ERP Implementation Your life Cycle, Crucial Success Elements (KSFs) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction Organization Resource Preparing (ERP) product is an integrated data system that is used to support organization processes and resource management within an organization. These systems integrate between one business unit to business units. Together with the implementation on this system within an organization to support the company’s functions, it is supposed to provide the best benefit for the company. This is particularly needed by the various commercial sectors from this era of lobalization. So , the company may compete with competition or even make a competitive advantage. In addition , ERP selection is usually done with different strategic factors both concrete and intangible. ERP software program has grown speedily the last 10 years. According to AMR Exploration, ERP program sales increased dramatically in 2004 reached 23. 6th billion dollars. Market Journal of Venture Resource Preparing Studies two growth level remained steady in 2005, and the end of 2009 the ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING software sales reached twenty-four. 5 billion dollars (Hestermann, Anderson; Pang, 2009). Among the largest
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING companies is definitely SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (a A language like german Company). The company controls about 40% from the market in fact it is the third most significant software business in the world. Based on data coming from SAP AG, about 80% of SAP’s sales take place in Europe and the United States, while the remaining twenty percent spread in Asia. The key reason of the investment made by companies is due to the ERP program integration business and this promises to enhance the company’s competitive position in the market (Luo and Strong, 2004). Some rewards have also been regularly cited in numerous studies relevant to the ERP system, such as: data and pplication integration as a substitute for legacy systems, lower cost and faster application compared with under one building development, implementing ERP guidelines into business company procedures (Markus, 2004). However , a few other cases present that purchases of Information Technology (IT) with substantial money may not necessarily bring optimum benefits. This can be shown by Dantes & Hasibuan (2010) who illustrate that almost 60% of ERP rendering in Dalam negri in both equally public and companies include failed. Even big companies in the world such as: FoxMeyer Drug and Dell Computer system have pent quite a lot of cash for execution of ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING but the benefits obtained are not optimal (Kalakota and Robinson, 2001). It was reported that FoxMeyer just like all huge companies engaged in pharmaceutical declare themselves insolvent because of failing in applying the system. Based on the above data, a survey conducted simply by Robbins-Giowa in American firms in 2001 found that about 51% of companies in America possess failed inside the implementation of ERP (IT Cortex, 2003), In Chinese suppliers, it is estimated that the ERP execution success rate is merely 10% (Zhang et ‘s., 2003).
Success and inability of ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING system implementation is inspired by many aspects of both internal and external agencies. Various factors are influencing the success of ERP implementation. Many researchers identified critical success factors about ERP execution, but they were not put in practice. Therefore , with this study we all examine the KSF and propose a priority of KSFs on ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING implementation lifestyle cycle, the two technical and non technical issues that effect the ERP implementation accomplishment. Theoretical Background The following subwoofer sections talk about ERP rendering life routine, KSFs in ERP mplementation process, and measurement of ERP execution success version. Implementation Existence Cycle ERP implementation is definitely changing via legacy devices into ERP system. It truly is more about process change instead of technology change alone. This section will describe the stages on ERP implementation from past research, by which each model has distinct stages. In general, ERP implementation process offers three main stages: pre-implementation, implementation and post-implementation (Capaldo and Rippa, 2009). Yet , some researchers considered every single stage to be sub-stages according to their viewpoints.
you
