Research from Composition:
Inspiration Theory and Ergonomics
The study by simply Szalma (2014) entitled For the Application of Determination Theory to Human Factors/Ergonomics: Motivational Design Principles intended for Human-Technology Connection proposes a set of principles and guidelines intended for motivational style that can be put on the field of ergonomics. In terms of health insurance and occupational protection, the article targets how determination theory works well for reducing hazards associated with exhaustion, stress and boredom in the workplace environment simply by assessing the motivation aspects within the technology-human interaction. This kind of paper can discuss the objectives of Szalmas (2014) study, the idea used, the concepts used, the disagreement made, the technique employed, the evidence obtained, the values identified, the literary works reviewed, as well as the contribution to ergonomic relief of knowing that the study makes.
The article sets out to achieve this objectives: initially, the article attempts to describe a theoretical type of motivation in human technology interaction, and, second, that puts forwards the design rules to guide the idea; the third and final target of the content is to explain the pattern of steps that should be employed for evaluating the motivational factors used in the interaction between humans and technology (p. 1453). The content achieves all these objectives simply by explaining precisely the model theory it uses to explain the discourse between individuals and technology (motivation theory); the guidelines to get how to apply the theory will be discussed in depth in the section of the study devoted to describing the results/findings in the article; as well as the sequence of steps can be clearly discovered.
Szalma (2014) uses the motivational theoretical framework to approach the issue of how humans and technology can interact. The explanation for this really is that while inspiration theory is definitely not normally utilized in individual factors/ergonomics, this actually can easily play a large effective position in understanding just how technology and humans communicate. The main reason the idea has not been utilized sufficiently by researchers in the past is that they have got operated from your assumption which the actor/operator has already been motivated and/or that that motivation theory is more of an organizational strategy and not the one that directly influences human factors/ergonomics. Szalma (2014) points out that assumption is faulty mainly because automated equipment technology can cause human dullness, which can in a negative way impact anxiety levels and increase risk factors linked to performance. In line with the research study, inspiration is comprised of three factors – goals, energy to pursue individuals goals, and the ability to persevere against road blocks (Szalma, 2014, p. 1454). These variables can help to describe human behavior outcomes for how humans respond to their particular environment – and technology being area of the environment as a result becomes a main player because outcome. As a result, the theorys usage is definitely justified by the idea that an interface is intended to support a person in getting a goal whilst in the the construction of meaning for the activity inside the given framework (Szalma, 2014, p. 1455).
The central concept applied to the study is a self-determination theory of inspiration and its software to human being factors/ergonomics. The concept introduces the notion that technology is a element in the way that humans behave because it is section of the environment. Motivation is the main concept that is discussed at length in the content. How dullness, fatigue and stress play a role in inspiration is explained (Szalma, 2014, 1455). Technology that is used for any goal-oriented goal has an impact on individuals standard of boredom, pressure and fatigue. Usability designs, moreover, work extremely well to help explain the motivational structures or processes underlying user intentions and behavior (Szalma, 2014, p. 1456). The central concept is clearly defined plus the reason that it is used as the focus with the article is done explicit and referenced carefully throughout the content. By assessing the issues of reducing dangers within the work environment environment, just like fatigue, boredom and pressure, the model can mitigate these factors and reduce all their impact on efficiency levels. This kind of assertion would not come by way of a formal theoretical but it could be argued which it acts as one, as it is the key theory submit in the article.
However , you cannot find any specific, formal hypothesis or null speculation made for the study. No quantitative measurements are taken. Rather a model of