Fuzy
The conventional one-dimensional gas chromatography (1D-GC) compared to a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC? GC) which provides the highest capacity, better resolution and a lot of of sensitivity. Additionally , it was create two-dimensional structure chromatogram, which is the proof of assistance in the composite resin class. Trials can often be reduced or even taken away in some cases to get the practice, as technology provides superb separation power.
All these rewards make GC? GC in the toxic compounds involved in the determination of trace level environmental analysis of a very good instrument in sophisticated matrices. This paper summarizes some of the environmental analysis and review and monitoring with the GC? GC applications
Introduction
Many years of humans society expansion led to many of the world circulation of chemical substances in the atmosphere, the Earth’s surface and land boundary. Many of these substances are damaging to the world’s ecosystems and the people. Evaluation of these compounds in the environment is important. When analytes include high water vapor pressure, gas chromatography is definitely the selection approach. The main issue in the environmental analysis is to evaluate the existence of material is usually extremely complex matrix trace. Consequence, a huge study into the research of main environmental contaminants [1].
Methods employed in environmental analysis is usually the same as in all aspects of practice. It provides sampling, test preparation, splitting up and recognition. All of these steps may reap the benefits of change, as well as the biggest limits imposed by the separation step. In gas chromatography (GC) cases, the majority of environmental examples containing analyte and matrix components of a large number of closely eluting peaks in a chromatographic dimension (1D) the most total capability is greatly exceeded, and many coelutions and unresolved inside the separation place was seen. This triggered the analyte of interest and quantify poor people separation [1].
Poor resolution inside the chromatographic evaluation of sample preparation and detection of high demand for products placement. Expensive and labor-intensive sample preparation, and solvent waste could potentially cause a lot of harmful to environmental surroundings. By microextraction method expansion, such as liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) and solid phase microextraction (SPME) and non-dissolved test introduction program (ie, direct thermal desorption), has the probability of greatly simplify the sample preparation procedure, without sacrificing level of sensitivity and selectivity [2-5]. On research, lack of resolution often means applying mass spectrometry (MS), which includes high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), in some cases, is essential. Figure 1 illustrates the GC-MS found in the common problems [36]. In the analysis of food components commonly 1D-GC clinch with insecticides (Fig. 1b), track interest (in this case chlorfenvinphos) coelute analyte and sample matrix is more abundant components. Results obtained for this sort of compounds, mass spectrometry (Figure 1e) regularly contains ingredients derived from pieces of disturbance, leading to poor matching and library mass spectrometry (Fig. 1d). MS overlap protocol may significantly improve the quality of the info of coeluting peak, but are not always effective, when the quantity of coelutions can be high. Physique 1a displays, full 2D-GC (GC? GC) to increase space and improve the chromatographic parting of the image resolution, resulting in the separation of analytes of interest (chlorfenvinphos) via coeluting compounds and matrix components. Result, improved the standard of the analyte mass (Fig. 1c), considering the evidence of a more comfortable analysis of fabric (Figure 1d). It is possible that some coelutions exist, these types of may often solve effectively overlap together with the MS, ultimately causing better results, while reducing the amount of components when the coeluting. GC? GC parting with the elevated power resulting in a successful exhibition and quantification of analytes.
Fig. 1GC? GC”TOF MS versus 1D-GC”TOF MS intended for the research of a carrot extract.
The highest-capacity problem in terms of conventional gas chromatography through multi-dimensional gas chromatography to manage (MDGC) setup. In this technique, one-dimensional (1D) chromatogram of your complex and unresolved part is put through the stationary phase layered with a second column splitting up of the other selectivity [1]. Although this technique increases the 1D chromatographic area of the choice of chromatographic resolutions, this method with motorisation challenging, in support of a few sample components may be adequately tackled. However , the countless applications will work for the PCBs, pesticides and toxaphene analysis, and a lot more, the record with different degrees of success [6-12]. Total, however , is definitely the exact volume of separation will be beneficial, if the entire sample is afflicted by a splitting up in two dimensions. This kind of became conceivable a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC? GC) in the launch.
Theory for Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography (GC? GC)
2D-GC is a thorough method of primary solution to fulfill the highest potential. A typical composition of GC? GC occur Figure installment payments on your The basic composition of GC? GC employing virtually is the same as the composition of 1D-GC. These include syringes, oven, articles and detectors. In a typical GC? GC system, applying non-polar stationary phase lined with a solid coating of any long column was installed as the main column. The exports by using a special interface or modem is connected to the entrance with the second dimensions column covered with fixed phase of another selectivity. Modulator connected not only to main and secondary column, it is main role is repeated trapping with the effluent fractions from the first dimension and periodic injection of them to the form of narrow pulses separated into additional chromatographic evaluation. Because the operation of 2D-GC in the fast condition, the detector in the GC? GC selection is limited to those competent of quickly data collection rate. For example , GC? GC detector may include flame ionization detector (FID), electron capture detector (ECD), single atomic emission detector (AED), sulfur compounds optical detector (SCD), nitrogen photodetector compounds (NCD) and moments of flight mass spectrometer (TOF MS).
Modulator is the significant part of the tool, because it assures the separating is extensive and multidimensional [13]. In 1991, the first rendering of the GC? GC, the field has witnessed several modulator design [14]. Initially, the application of thermal modification of the warmth modulator was implemented, however , the flip cryogenic liquid (liquid co2 or nitrogen) is currently the main use. Modulator at low temperatures within the system, every single design has its distinct positive aspects and constraints, making it ideal for analysis from the specific type. For example , the analysis of water toxins has been created an program [19], when the complexes, and an in-house applications modulator in the quantitative analysis of PAHs and PCBs continues to be described [15]. Then simply, the modulator of the various kinds of analyte in the analysis of organohalogenated recently been evaluated [16].
The implementation of GC? GC provides the next advantage to surpass the 1D parting method: improvement separation power, improved breathing difficulties, and constructs or remarkably predetermined, stratography spectrum. Inside the environment analysis, GC? GC has the potential to improve the dangerous compound throughout the separation from the coeluting research and the matrix component, enhances the detection limit such chemical substance product and provides the ideal to get the cctv surveillance application the two-dimensional stratography spectrum which in turn constructs. Finally, this quite possibly causes to lessen to the littlest sample planning procedure, and reduces examination time. Various other applications can also be possible. For example , recently, GC? GC the product estimate which will divided into to get the diesel oil hydrocarbon environment had used, was important affected many ecosystems [17] the oil drip.
Application of GC? GC in Environmental Analysis
Water and Sediment Evaluation
The water is the most basic materials to the existence in world. In order to estimation that the tap water safety pertaining to human intake, the speedy, precise and the accurate technique needs to analysis the water. The sediment is also important for riv and the lake, The examination of normal water pollutant is usually time-consuming test preparation, comes after by GC-MS analyzes. Inside the initial period realized that GC? GC provides the great potential improvement to analysis normal water and sediment.
In its original applications in this region, GC? GC was discussed possibly from your common matrix interference which can be separating the BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene) and methyl liquor tert butyl ether (MTBE), when and SPME [18]. The separation strength of GC? GC is improved, MTBE and the benzene are definitely the foundation series solution in the 2nd chromatograph analysis space. This exploration showed GC? GC provides the great likelihood of water pollutant analysis by combination this technology with microextraction (head space SPME).
Certain Globe’s freshwater person is polluted daily by petroleum and the petrol contamination. In the early 1970s, it is pays attention the petroleum sample stratography range to exhibit a model, has not resolved, foundation collection which rises “hillock [20]. Chromatogram is the complex part, which include compound many kinds, refers to “unsolution complex mixture at present [21]. GC? GC-FID uses in research of two different freshwater sediments [21]. Noticed the conventional test preparation procedure, the author has used the excellent resolution, and has constructed the chromatogram of residue for UCM different levele by GC? GC. The chromatogram received for two samples provides simply by clue path contamination essential source researcher., The research revealed GC? GC the potential important in the environment law, intended for an environmental chemistry simple tool, environmental audit.
The nonylphenol polyethylene ethoxides’ degenerated product, was possible girly hormone splitter [22]. Increases the concern, NPs through the urban area [23] the and the deposition present are found. GC? GC-TOF MS is the NP isomer separation by technical blend [24] employed. 41 elements are recognized. Figure several explanation GC? GC-TOF MS application to NP isomer respective ion trace research from the same research. Two NP stave products were explained that m/z one hundred thirty five (chart 3a) and m/z 149 (chart 3b). Two chromatogram event group type separation, emphasizes by the connection compound maximum maximum benefit in the identical homologous family members incline collection. It via as a result of several NP isomer structure likeness, the complete separation is the extremely tough this chart is apparent. However , various other resolution durability by GC? GC supplied “cleanly the mass range to provide, manufactured the examination proof to always be easier.
Fig. three or more.Extracted ion GC? GC”TOF MS chromatograms of a technological nonylphenyl (NP) mixture
GC? GC for to the environment pollutant’s evaluation was just lately the application current in oceanic deposit [25]. A qualitative approach has developed, quickly and is unified according to the inclination by the ultrasonic wave assistance’s extraction towards the complex sample’s high resolution evaluation provides to GC? GC-TOF UAE which is fast and high efficiency selective sampling pretreatment procedure is utilized solid sample [30]. A high efficiency and has the selective sample preparing method, if the powerful separation method GC? GC combine with UAE can easily causes truck kind of a lot more than several not aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) the compound plus the certificate image resolution, NPs and dialkylated benzene. Once more, GC? GC not merely ability by each other seclusion analysis, and has verified from the test matrix invaluable.
The carcinogen which as well as the mutagen supposed, PAHs is definitely many industry activity result and the general existence is usually distributed in the environment. Since it requests hard sledding and has the selective sample preparation, they inside the deposition sample’s trace determination are tough. The improvement to complex matrix’s PAHs, the Cavagnino track analysis with GC? GC-FID [large-volume splitless shot (LVSI) technology]. Sample intricate which evaluates is a large number of deposition test representative who have obtains in the river and the lake. Separated and investigates seven PAHs which diluted in the synthesis diesel essential oil to demonstrate the LVSI- GC? GC-FID potential achievement inside the low ppb level pertaining to to trace amount analysis 1 powerful and the rapid tool in intricate matrix PAHs.
While, Ong. and so on has developed a PAHs rapid cctv surveillance method likely in the ground sample, utilizes liquid extraction (PLE) ” GC? GC-FID [27]. The current posting work is just GC? GC latent functional demonstration to deposition sample PAH research. In brief, while using resolution which will improves, improvement many sensitivities and the stratography spectrum which in turn orders, GC? GC may add on the effect which powerful and the quick sample prep method produces cannot be achieved by the routine analysis procedure.
Research of PCBs, PCDDs and PCDFs
Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and several polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners is completely outclassed by bioaccumulation and biomagnification in the environment and thus can be described as dangerous The wildlife and individuals. Many are supposed carcinogens and induced adjustments of [28]. Of PCBs, dioxins and furans in the environment assessment of certain requirements of a solution to isolate and quantify them in complicated samples including food, soil and drinking water.
GC? GC provides a single advantageous approach in intricate matrix’s PCDDs and the PCDFs analysis. In its one of early experiments, a liquid crystal main column and a large secondary column (according to steam pressure separation) uses in (according to the planarity separation) isolates the sculpt ” and from technological mixture [30] non-straight PCB congeners. The connection GC? GC microelectron records investigates (MECD) is harmful PCBs, PCDDs and the PCDFs determination may be the application in the cod hard working liver sample [29]. The analysis result showed most 12 goal PCB coming from liver test congeners, and the most toxic Dai Aoxin and fu nan the full separating and the proof nail quickly with 80 PCBs and 17 contain poison PCDDs and PCDFs. Moreover, when ever compares with all the standard sample preparation treatment, the lean meats sample pretreatment does not have the selectivity and reduces to is smallest. It has included the direct injection and fractionation followed cell level of illness steadily draws back, the centrifuge process to enter GC? GC the system. Number 4 exhibiting from the second stratography variety which acquires to the cod liver sample’s analysis. Recently, an item of multilaboratory studies have been conducted in food sample, evaluates PCDD/Fs and World Wellness Organization PCBs through all over again GC? GC-MECD and the GC-HRMS comparison as well as the explanation GC? GC great potential in the rapid cctv surveillance application [31].
While using standard examination method comparison GC? GC, GC? GC the overall performance is specific (GC? GC-ID-TOF MS) needs to 13C tag isotopic dilution (ID) TOF MS regular GC-HRMS to appraise [32]. Quantification 17 PCDD/Fs and four PCBs nail quickly in the dirt and in the deposition sample are two methods are comparable. However , GC? GC implementation obtain only tiniest sample preparation, and causes the signal improvement (factor 5-10), superior resolution, lower instrumentation expense, and improved TOF the MS data [32] the ghost overlaps legally. As top capacity which and image resolution result increases, the unknown compound’s resistant is possible.
Fig. 4GC? GC”ECD chromatogram of any cod liver organ sample spiked with 90 PCBs [29].
Pesticide Analysis
Forms the challenge to the pesticide evaluation to analyze the chemist to organize about the sample to help make the law and the chromatography. Is comparable other poisonous compound, the pesticide is usually distributed in the trace quantity environment. Additionally, they are severe complex matrix part of such as foods, the soil as well as the water sample. Needs to be just like today squeezes to the rapid high resolution examination method.
GC? GC the applying early demonstrated the method potential regular setup to the pesticide analysis in person’s organization in the future. Supercritical invariable removal (SFE) with GC? GC-FID together utilizes the examination in person’s blood serum [33] the pesticide. To were handful of from the well-defined person’s blood serum extraction’s 15 pesticide’s foundation range segments achieve in several minutes. Afterwards, GC? GC-FID to approximate that the child pesticide direct exposure has been employed through the make use of urine and the blood serum [34] low-power. This particular example in were couple of showed sixteen pesticide total separations in four minutes. Recently, has become demonstrated which include PCBs and the organic chlorine pesticide 59 organization pollutant’s proof as well as the quantification [35]. Although GC? GC-ID-TOF MS completed the similar result creator who went in normal routine examination (GC-ID-TOFMS) to indicate that analyzed like this, three different injection needs. GC? GC the application early revealed the method potential regular execution to the pesticide analysis in person’s firm in the future. Supercritical invariable removal (SFE) with GC? GC-FID together utilizes the evaluation in individual’s blood serum [33].
Pesticide perseverance in meals extract is usually similarly essential. Separated using GC? GC-TOF MS and identifies 54.99 pesticides to nail fast completely around the vegetable was explained [36]. This completed with have been smallest and the nonselective test preparation: The celery or the carrot sample and the sodium acetate and the ethyl acetate have chopped, mixed, was mixed, has been separated, and is also dried. The extract can be injected joined GC? GC [36].
Recently, segregated 12 halogenate compound sort of groups five different GC? GC column combination to appraise, which include PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs, multi-chlorobenzene diphenyl ester (PCDEs), multi-chlorobenzene naphthalene (PCNs), multi-chlorobenzene dibenzothiophenes (PCDTs), multi-chlorobenzene terphenyl (PCTs), multi-chlorobenzene alkane (PCAs), toxaphene, multi-bromination biphenyl (PBBs), multi-bromination diphenyl azure (PBDEs) and organic chlorine pesticide (OCPs) [37]. Although this article focal point is a different compound kind of major group isolates, was as well explained in the family separation. When the separating and proof all twenty eight OCPs happen to be pure pesticide mixture features only been demonstrated that vast majority has been separated fully, seeing that, when drives along additional 11 chemical substance kind of [37]. Consequently , its as if that the steering column establishment which will disposes appropriately with one particular, GC? GC may use will take mainly shields step intended for the environment test contamination and along pollutant many other sort of pesticides, with smallest sample preparation.
Atmosphere Analysis
Unpredictable organic substance (VOCs) in metropolis photochemical smog [38] the generation plays a solid character. The earth Health Organization thought that probably has to the air granular material’s exposition for the human well being [39] the ill result. But , doubt existence regarding from VOCs health effect in metropolis granular materials (PM) [40]. Consequently , requests speedy, reliable and information method guarantee in air pollutant successful security, proof and discovery.
Various PAHs and PAHs (oxy-PAHs) which oxidizes is the carcinogen which and the mutagen supposed, with, therefore they are inside the metropolis pulverizador analysis successful target analysis. GC? GC-FID and GC? GC four-pole MS (QMS) is applied permits coming from Finland regarding 1500 peaks goal PAHs [41] investigates in the city air test and the resistant. But female is single the method intended for the substance proof as well as the quantification, applied GC? GC-FID the mixture to confirm the great reproducibility. 13 non-goal PAHs has been discovered, and eight goal PAHs by subspecies. Found PAH centralism range (0. 5-5. 5 ng/m3) with in European countries [41] other areas of normal methods obtained the result was comparable.
The cigarette smoke is estimate serious complex combination component [43] which has certainly not recognized which includes about four, 700 kind of identification’s chemical substance and 90, 000. GC? GC-TOFMS utilizes the solution around from the tobacco smoke [43] 31, 000 peaks. After this, evaluates cigarette smoke condensate simpler sample determination neutrality score [44], standard score [45] and acidic score [46] chemical formula. Conventional GC-MS possible to split up 200 unfamiliar peaks and identifies 116 hydrocarbons in the cigarette condensate limitless simple scores, To identical test GC? GC analysis, nevertheless , has accomplished 4, 000 kind of chemical substance separations and 1, 800 hydrocarbons [44] proved. Within research, GC? GC-TOF has identified 377 kind of nitrogen-containing compound for the cigarette condensate’s basic score’s MS evaluation, in one hundred fifty five is the pyridine derivative, 104 kinds kui lin or different kui lin offshoot and 56 kind of pyrazine derivative [45].
Conclusions
GC? GC has obtained the condition swiftly for towards the volatile organic compound evaluation most powerful tool. It appoints oneself accomplishment to be appropriate completely to get in the sophisticated sample surveillance analysis technology. In the environment analyzed location, this includes PCBs by the evaluation many case in point testimony for the common environment pollutant, PCDDs, PCDFs, PAHs and the pesticide in the complicated environment matrix. Moreover, GC? GC has the potential to make simpler the sample preparation treatment (even entirely to eliminate them), when concurrently causes when the shorter general analysis period high resolution stratography spectrum.
Relating to widely a fresh analysis method which retreats into, not only that is definitely reliable and renewable, but it should also show the significant benefit to surpass the method which accepts. The example reported the demonstrating GC? GC method benefit in this assessment in the traditional 1DGC separating. In GC? GC famous first years period, the instrumentation creation is the main focus, However , via GC? GC system’s commercialization, the application amount which reported greatly improves in the environment analysis and other scientific domains. Therefore , we might anticipate that the transition motorisation GC? GC is single on-line sample which the messages uses to arrange gradually the gear in the standard environmental monitoring.
Recommendations
1 .Marriott PJ. Haglund P, Ong RCY. Clin Chim Acta. 2003328: 1″19.
2 .Pawliszyn J. Sturdy phase microextraction, theory and practice. Wiley, New York. 97.
3.Pawliszyn J. (1999) Applications of stable phase microextraction. Royal Society of Biochemistry and biology, Cambridge.
4.Dettmer K, Engewald W. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2002, 373: 490″500.
your five.Butrym Elizabeth. LC-GC. 199917: S19″S24.
6.de Geus H-J, Wester PG, Schelvis A, de Boer L, Brinkman UATh. J Presque Monit. 2150, a couple of: 503″511.
7.Mrowetz SHJ. L Chromatogr A. 1983, 279: 173″187.
8.Duinker JC, Schultz SOBRE, Petrick G. Mar Pollut Bull. 1998, nineteen: 19″25.
9.Storr-Hansen E. Int J Environ Anal Chem.1991, 43: 253″266.
10.Silvis LD, Kapila S, Yan Q, Elseewi AA. T Chromatogr A.1994, 688: 221″230.
11.Schurig V, Reich S. Chirality. 1998, 10: 425″429.
doze.Liem DAK. Trends Anal Chem. 99, 18: 499″507.
13.Giddings JC. Anal Chem. 1984, 6: 1258A”1270A.
14.Liu Z, Phillips JB. M Chromatogr Sci.1991, 30: 227″231.
15.Hyotylainen T, Kallio M, Hartonen K, Jussila M, Palonen S, Riekkola M-L. Anal Chem. 2002, 74: 4441″4446.
16.Kristenson EM, Korytar P, Danielsson C, Kallio M, Brandt M, Makela J, Vreuls RJJ, Beens J, Brinkman UATh. T Chromatogr A. 2003, 1019: 65″77.
18.Arey JS, Nelson RK, Xu D, Reddy CENTIMETER. Anal Chem. 2005, 77: 7172″7182.
18.Gaines RB, Ledford EB, Stuart JD. J Microcol Sep. 98, 15: 597″604.
19.Beens J, Dalluge J, Adahchour M, Vreuls JJR, Brinkman UATh. T Microcol Sep. 2001, 13: 134″140.
20.Blumer Meters, Souza G, Sass T. Mar Biol. 1970, 5: 195″202.
21.Frysinger GS, Gaines RB, Xu L, Reddy CENTIMETER. Environ Sci Technol. 2003, 37: 653″1662.
22.Mueller SO. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004, 378: 582″587.
twenty three.Ieda To, Horii Y, Petrick G, Yamashita D, Ochiai N, Kannan E. Environ Sci Technol. june 2006, 39: 7202″7207.
24.Moeder M, Martin C, Schlosser D, Harynuk J, Gorecki T. M Chromatogr A. 2006, 1107: 233″239.
twenty-five.Morales-Munoz S i9000, Vreuls RJJ, Luque sobre Castro MARYLAND. J Chromatogr A. 2006, 1086: 122″127.
26.Cavagnino D, Magni P, Zilioli G, Trestianu S. J Chromatogr A. 2003, 1019: 211″220.
28.Ong L, Lundstedt S, Haglund G, Marriott L. J Chromatogr A. 2003, 1019: 221″232.
28.Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM. Environmental organic chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ. 2003.
29.Korytar P, Leonards PEG, de Boer M, Brinkman UATh. J Chromatogr A. 2002, 958: 203″218.
30.Haglund P, Harju M, Ong R, Marriott P. L Microcol Sep. 2001, 13: 306″311.
23.Danielsson C, Wiberg T, Korytar L, Bergek T, Brinkman UATh, Haglund S. J Chromatogr A. june 2006, 1086: 61″70.
32.Focant J-F, Reiner EJ, Mcpherson K, Kolic T, Sjodin A, Patterson DG Jr, Reese SL, Dorman FLORIDA, Cochran J. Talanta. 2005, 63: 1231″1240.
33.Liu Z, Sirimanne SR, Patterson DG Junior, Needham LL. Anal Chem. 1994, 66: 3086″3092.
34.Dimandja J-M, Grainger T, Patterson DG Jr, Turner WE, Needham LL. T Exp Anal Environ Epidem. 2000, 10: 761″768.
thirty five.Focant J-F, Sjodin A, Turner WE ALL, Patterson DG Jr. Anal Chem. 2005, seventy six: 6313″6320.
36.Dalluge J, truck Rijn M, Beens M, Vreuls RJJ, Brinkman UATh. J Chromatogr A. 2002, 965: 207″217.
37.Korytar P, Leonards PEG, sobre Boer J, Brinkman UATh. J Chromatogr A. 2005, 1086: 29″44.
38.Fowler D, Coyle M, Ashmore MR, Bower J, Williams ML, Smith R, Dollard GJ, Shelter DS, Jenkin M, Stedman JR, Cox RA, Derwent RG, Harrison RM, Hewitt CN, Maynard RL, Penkett SA, Weston KJ, Forest PJ, Burgess RA, Anderson R. Last Report with the Oxidants Review Group 75-104. UK Office of the Environment, Transport and Regions, London. 1997.
39.WHO. Health aspects of smog with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Globe Health Business, Bonn. the year 2003.
40.Welthagen W, Schnelle-Kreis J, Zimmermann R. J Chromatogr A. 2003, 1019: 233″249.
forty one.Kallio M, Hyotilainen To, Lehtonen M, Jussila ML, Hartonen E, Shimmo Meters, Riekkola M-L. J Chromatogr A. the year 2003, 1019: 251″ 260.
42.Schnelle-Kreis J, Welthagen Watts, Sklorz Meters, Zimmermann Ur. J Sep Sci. 2006, twenty eight: 1648″1657.
43.Dalluge J, truck Stee LLP, Xu By, Williams T, Beens L, Vreuls RJJ, Brinkman UATh. J Chromatogr A.2002, 974: 169″184.
44.Lu X, Zhao M, Kong L, Cai M, Wu T, Wu M, Hua L, Liu T, Xu G. J Chromatogr A. 2005, 1043: 265″273.
45.Lu X, Zhao M, Cai J, Kong H, Wu J, Wu M, Hua R, Liu J, Xu G. L Sep Sci.200427: 101″109.
46.Lu X, Cai J, Zhao M, Kong H, Wu J, Wu M, Hua R, Liu J, Xu G. Anal Chem. 200574: 4441″4451.
