In June 2010, the Minister of Education Muhyiddin announced the probability of UPSR, and PMR exams being removed. With the changing policies through the Ministry of Education every time the minister changes, (Kheru, 2011) this kind of news came up as a no real surprise. But the primary issue still remains in one piece.
It is not only the UPSR, and PMR, although should we just eliminate the whole three main exams, UPSR, PMR, and SPM?
Even though tests makes learners focus in their studies, and can differentiate, whether or not they should be inside the arts stream or in the science stream, these examinations only restricts creative thinking as it makes the students study just for the sake of moving the exams and college students do not analyze anything besides the issues that will can be found in the assessments. The initially argument the anti-abolishment positions is that the students can target in their studies with the UPSR, PMR and SPM assessments. However , college students can still concentrate on their research with the regular semester testing and yearly examinations.
The regular examinations is often more effective as it will keep the students on their toes because they cannot only have 1 test to pass but a monthly/ annual tests/ assessments. It will can certainly make the students take examinations even more seriously because the examinations can be treated being a long- term assessment. (Murali, 2012) For example , every month we now have a simple test just to check the progress from the students, in that case before the initial semester break and the year-end break, execute an examination. It is just like our current system, only without the UPSR, PMR and SPM.
Another argument mentioned by the anti-abolishment is that the exam is the simply way the college can distinguish the students that may go to technology stream or perhaps arts stream (Fared, 2010). But , while using long-term evaluation, the instructors would know what suits these people most throughout the results from the exam. The scholars talents will show in the benefits, whether they are more suited for research stream or art stream. The professors will play an important role inside the selection of students because it is all of them that have one of the most contact with the students.
They should be able to tell if the students are usually more suitable in science or arts. For example , if a scholar’s results demonstrates she does a great job at math and technology, then they is suited more inside the science stream but if a student shows ongoing problems in science and mathematics, then he/she is probably not suited to the science stream. Thirdly, the anti-abolishment explained that the educators will start staying lazy if the three primary exams will be abolished. (Fared, 2010). With the long-term examination, the teachers’ job will be more than enough.
The educators would need to take notice of the students’ growth more tightly because the students’ potential will be gauge simply by the instructors so that to determine whether their abilities belong in the science or arts stream. The tests and year examinations will make sure the teachers teach the students effectively by completing the syllabus promptly. The instructors also have to perform other activities to completely gauge your students potential and further develop their creativity and self assurance with actions which makes them to be more out bound and open minded.
Personally I believe that the three examinations (UPSR, PMR and SPM) can lead to the students to lack character and creativity, and will certainly not be qualified enough to fulfil future careers. The exam-oriented education system distorts motivation and learning by overemphasising the importance of ratings as final results and procedures of students’ abilities. (Murali, 2012) This statement could not be more accurate, as there are a large number of students that have excellent ratings but their gentle skills, like public speaking and presenting their own ideas and arguments, will be largely missing.
Moreover, pupils lack the confidence to correct the teachers if the instructors are incorrect. According to Murali, inside the article ‘GOOD scores, no life expertise, “In my personal classes, learners do not dare to talk beside me because of the lack of confidence and intellect to justify fights. They may be used to having blinding trust in authority, which are the professors and the books. They would not really think that the teachers or maybe the textbooks could be wrong.
Resulting in them getting too influenced by the educators and are certainly not willing to get around rather than what they acquired done in category. To sum it up, although examinations makes students concentrate in their studies, and can differentiate, whether they needs to be in the arts stream or in the research stream, we need to keep in mind that these examinations only hampers creative thinking because it makes the students study only for the sake of getting the level the exams and students do not research anything aside from the matters that will are available in the assessments.
We should take the education system of countries like US, Quotes and the European Union as a reference point because their very own system provides the students the opportunities to improve many types of their particular intelligence. The scholars are inspire to be innovative, free-thinking, more tolerant and open-minded person. ( Kheru, 2011) Countries like Cina, Japan and Korea have already started to help to make a within their education system, albeit slowly. Therefore , when are we gonna start? Or are we even now going to stick with the system that was created when we were continue to colonised by the British?
