Home » dissertation examples » 48053639


Chelsea Long Beliefs 100-005 Prompt 2 Final Essay Even though they were segregated by centuries, hundreds of mls, and different ethnicities, the philosophical views of Friedrich Nietzsche and Escenario can be analyzed and considered against the other person in many various ways. Friedrich Nietzsche, born in 1844, was obviously a German philosopher whose main goal was to build a new graphic for the folks and to make a free nature in these people. Plato, created in 427 B.

C., was a Greek philosopher whose main goal was going to create a fresh way of thinking about the world by itself, knowledge alone, philosophy on its own, and the specific.

Both philosophers have obvious similarities, their literary design of writing is possibly the most evident, but also their aspire to create a fresh way of thinking intended for the people in which they hoped to impact. Nietzsche thought that by position outside of society and looking by it via a different view, one could undertake the ideal of your free nature. Analogous for this view can be Plato’s watch from the type of the cave which demonstrates humans to be completely unacquainted with what the real world is definitely.

Even though they will lived in very different societies, both philosophers thought that the view worldwide that contemporary society holds shelters the individual by seeing the real nature of reality. Yet , the nature of stated reality was very different to get both philosophers. Nietzsche supported a “what you see is what you get kind of look at of reality. His “amor fati look at of actuality posed that in order to obtain an optimistic view, the individual must learn to appreciate fate. This kind of also requires accepting fact for just what it is and never creating a phony sense of “reality”what the person would “like to see.

Due to Nietzsche’s opinion that ‘God is dead he thought that this existence was most there was, therefore the best way to have was to recognize the true reality of the world, and also use the love of precisely what is real and actual to relish life. Bandeja, on the other hand, had a completely different notion of reality. His theory from the “forms illustrated everything that we come across in this world because just a significantly less perfect model of the actual “form of the factor or idea. Nothing that we see on this planet is genuine or ideal, but is just an imperfect imitation.

Plato’s divided range interpretation gives the whole world into the obvious realm (images, copies, vegetation, animals) and the intelligible dominion (mathematics, suggestions, and the forms), literally a two-tiered perspective of actuality. This is different greatly via Nietzsche’s idea. Nietzsche rejects this “two-tiered view of reality, this individual believes that having this kind of view of reality is basically detrimental and hinders the consumer from living a full and optimistic life. Although their particular views on the way the individual is usually shielded by simply society are similar, the view in reality of Nietzsche and Plato is among the main variations in their philosophical outlooks.

Nietzsche and Escenario both place a considerable amount of emphasis on creating the person and browsing life as a work of art which is a canvas pertaining to knowledge and value, hence asking problem: “What creates a virtuous lifestyle?  The two philosophers believe in turning ones back around the morals and values that society keeps and exploring these honnête and ideals for the individual themselves. One of the most famous Traditional aphorisms can be “know thyself.  Nietzsche and Escenario both assume that creating ourself as people will result in happiness.

Yet , the quest of self-discovery is different for each philosopher. Escenario believes that knowledge is the central factor in the creation of virtue and happiness. Looking for after know-how leads to the affirmation of values and virtue, which then leads to happiness. By taking you a chance to learn and wonder and discover understanding pertaining to ourselves, we can achieve satisfaction. Nietzsche, alternatively, believes that pure educational scholarship is definitely not the right way to liberate the free-thinkers for the future.

Also, Nietzsche considers the revaluation of values, meaning old values need to be reconsidered to find reason of lifestyle within your life. He feels that knowledge has the ability to require itself also seriously. Nietzsche is an advocate intended for uniting know-how and play. He supposes that we create our beliefs ourselves and do not discover these people from nature or reason, as intended by Avenirse. However , both philosophers think that knowing the own ignorance and possessing a willingness to accept the fact that people are sometimes incorrect and at problem is a essential step in resulting in the morals and values that people hold.

One other main similarity between the philosophies of Nietzsche and Avenirse is the opinion that the finest individual is not the wealthiest, however the thinker, the artist, the musician, and namely, the philosopher. Both equally hold the take pleasure in of knowledge in excessive regard (although Plato holds it in higher regard that Nietzsche). The goal of this is to pass around the views of one to many, for that reason changing the views of society. With or with out meaning to, both of these philosophers are trying to stimulate a rise in society. Avenirse and Nietzsche both were suspicious of authorities and desired people to always be at conflict with their period.

From this, they wished to create a transform on an individual’s outlook on life. Much like most philosophers, the philosophical method of equally Plato and Nietzsche was influenced by simply philosophers available to them. Plato is a well-known protege of Socrates. Many of Plato’s dialogues consist of Socrates in them or are written about Socrates, such as The Apology, which is Plato’s account from the trial of Socrates. These are generally called Plato’s Socratic Listenings. The philosophical views of Socrates tremendously influenced the views of Plato. Nietzsche was widely influenced by the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.

Following studying the lovely view of Schopenhauer, Nietzsche’s writings sometimes included him supporting or rejecting Schopenhauer’s philosophical viewpoint. The optimism present in Nietzsche’s philosophy results from his rejection of Schopenhauer’s pessimistic philosophical point of view. One of the biggest differences between Avenirse and Nietzsche comes from their particular view of Socrates. When Socrates was a role version to Bandeja, he was the contrary for Nietzsche. Socrates frequently demanded the “truth in any way costs “meaning that no matter simply how much hurt or disorder the truth costs, it may still be informed for the sake of truth itself.

Nietzsche questioned as to the extent truth can be experienced. He then goes on to shift the term he uses for truth. “Truth is mistakes believed to be the case by philosophers (examples happen to be equal things, substance, and free will). Nietzsche’s TRUTH relies on the recognition that past “truths will be founded on mistakes and that know-how is limited, which is the opposite of Socrates’ getting pregnant of fact. By allowing go of previous “truths we can hence understand the TRUTH. Not all truth comes from knowledge, but via error as well.

Another main difference between philosophical sights of Socrates and Nietzsche is that Nietzsche looked at beliefs as an “intellectual science and not a science. This individual viewed viewpoint in more of a humanities category and as a spiritual science. Socrates, on the other hand, viewed idea as the most crucial of all sciences. Nietzsche also criticizes Socrates in other ways. He disorders his individuality. To Nietzsche, Socrates “pretended to be a rebel against contemporary society (a kind of “free spirit in Nietzsche’s book), nevertheless , when Socrates was sentenced in Athens, he gave in and became a “slave to world. Nietzsche’s idea says this life is all we have so we need to enjoy it. From looking at Socrates’ well-known last words and phrases: “Now that we am declining, I are obligated to repay the goodness of medicine a debt,  Nietzsche proves that Socrates didn’t get pleasure from his lifestyle. Socrates is saying in his last words that life is only one big disease. This should go against most of Nietzsche’s viewpoint, which unites the disaster of presence with the funny of lifestyle. The point of view of Nietzsche and Escenario on the philosophical view of Socrates can be described as major big difference between the two philosophers. A lot of Nietzsche’s philosophy comes from his conclusion that “God is dead. This kind of view on religious beliefs is another major difference between Plato and Nietzsche. Although Nietzsche was considered a great atheist, Avenirse believed in the principle of God. Plato’s “God was your Form of “the Good.  The “Good did not even fall on Plato’s divided line but was raised over it, shining down every both the noticeable and intelligible realm. Everything strives to become like the Form of the Good, yet can never obtain it (similar to the Christian view of Jesus “a perfect “good that people try to be but can never reach). Because Nietzsche and Bandeja had this sort of differing thoughts about religion, their philosophies in general are quite distinct.

There are similarities that can be chosen of the two men’s viewpoints “however the conceptual dissimilarities outweigh the resemblance. Plato’s and Nietzsche’s differing views on the nature of truth, the quest of self-discovery, the viewpoint of Socrates, and religion cause Nietzsche to be critical of Avenirse. Nietzsche completely rejects much of Plato’s main philosophical watch. The main factor Nietzsche is important of Escenario is Plato’s two-tiered view of the world. Nietzsche whole beliefs is dedicated to the recognition that what we should have now is all we will ever have.

Bandeja takes that philosophy and changes that completely ” creating a whole new realm that is not visible for the human eye. Despite the fact that both philosophers believe in beating society, the value of self-creation, knowing the own faults, and putting the thinker in high acclaim, I would argue that the differences between the Nietzsche and Plato cannot be reconciled. The main cores of their philosophical viewpoints will never match up. Nietzsche will not agree with a two-tiered look at of reality and among Plato’s biggest belief systems is the Forms. Socrates will be a leading man to Escenario, whereas he is not in Nietzsche’s judgment.

One of the philosopher’s would have to change the entire ideas of their viewpoint in order for both the viewpoints to reconcile. Privately, I agree more with Nietzsche’s philosophy. Despite the fact that I do not really believe that The almighty is lifeless, I do think that religion can be dying within our society. Our company is experiencing a cultural shift toward a more secular society. In the wake of this, I have noticed people have started to live their lives for the “right-now.  Also, I think that we ought to love destiny and recognize the reality of lives. In my opinion, people who stay in a disney aren’t genuinely living.

People who accept all their disappointments is obviously and are still happy and hopeful are more admirable to me. In addition , I like how Nietzsche believes that we is going to take the time to generate ourselves in life. Creating yourself, to me, is the central thing we are able to do. Searching away from what society tells us to do or be, we can truly turning into “free in addition to doing so, live happier lives. I feel as if Nietzsche desires us to take pleasure from the small things in life also to take life as it comes. Honestly, Nietzsche has been my personal favorite philosopher to read and examine, and the a single whose standpoint I agree with all the most.

< Prev post Next post >

Topic: Contemporary society,

Words: 1991

Published: 02.06.20

Views: 170