Excerpt from Essay:
web 2. 0 um Jaron Lanier o Claire Keen to review Andrew Keen’s views, watch video go through transcript interview Andrew Willing: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/media/july-dec07/internet_09-17.html to review Jaron Lanier’s views, essay, “Beware On-line Collective” URL: http://www.
Andrew Keen or Jaron Lanier’s views on Web 2. 0
The world wide web has converted the way all of us communicate and interact. Nevertheless , whether it is an influence for good or perhaps for sick remains a hotly-debated issue. According to media essenti Andrew Enthusiastic, rather than improve the quality of information that can be reached, the democratization of the Internet “is truly undermining reliable information and high-quality entertainment. By exchanging mainstream media content, high-quality the airwaves, television, papers, publishing, music… we’re… exchanging it with user-generated articles, which is unreliable, inane, and frequently rather corrupt” (Brown 2007). How can a poorly-researched weblog entry become a substitute for a paper in The New york city Times or perhaps a well-written content in a community newspaper, asks Keen? Unlike Keen’s almost entirely unfavorable view of the Internet while detrimental to democracy, critic Jaron Lanier praises the Internet’s potential to facilitate creativity, although Lanier is usually dismayed incidentally that company advertising interests have transfered and in his view affected the potential of the Internet to promote idiosyncratic views on the planet.
In defiance of typical wisdom, Claire Keen dismisses the participation facilitated on the web by the occurrence of social networking such as Myspace, Facebook or the ability to keep comments about message boards. “I don’t think that participation have been something which has been missing via American politics or culture” (Brown 2007). This generally seems to ignore the plunging voting rates in America, and while hardly as substantive in number as they should be, there may be little hesitation that the on-line fundraising and media advertising campaign of Barak Obama enjoyed a significant position in producing interest in his race pertaining to the obama administration in 08, even when having been a relatively little-known candidate. Eager would say, however , that the Internet results in Balkanization of ideological residential areas online, where individuals can make to socialize solely with members that belongs to them ideological tribes. This produces political polarization, which has as well increased while using rise of the Internet. The Internet has hence provoked significantly less communication (one of the most important elements of a modern democracy) rather than facilitated it, despite the easy sending some text with a push of a button.
But the Internet’s multiform and flitting nature at first prompted Jesse Lanier to adopt a very diverse view. “One of the most great things about the rise in the Web and also other Internet-based connection schemes can be how anti-mob they have been. I had been in nirvana 10 years ago watching thousands of people build internet sites for the first time as a form of expression” (Lanier 2006). Lanier recognizes the individuality facilitated by Internet while healthy, risk-free and the progress small areas as a positive cultural second.
Lanier’s look at is not entirely positive, however. Like Keen, this individual also cites the private nature, anger, and meanness that can be made when people may express their views consequence-free, without going out of any search for of their id when they generate a brief review. He likewise dislikes computerized mass content sites like DIGG and REDDIT. Although Lanier just mentions a number of examples, there are plenty of online, which will simply regurgitate the same materials in different forms, leading to more mass homogenization rather than democratization, dialogue, and debate. The company model of Web 2 . 0. 0 of trying to focus viewership around content sites like Vimeo so they see advertisements, Lanier feels will dilute the positive potential of the Net.
Overall, Lanier’s view with the potential in the Internet can be far sunnier than Keen’s. Lanier is more distrustful of large corporations and large content sites homogenizing the medium than individual users becoming egocentric. Keen declares that the Internet encourages solipsism. It reephasizes the worst, navel-gazing values inherent in modern world. “We also see, I do believe, many of the most severe developments in modern cultural life, and, in particular, I do think we see the things i call digital narcissism, this kind of embrace with the self… I don’t assume that the key to citizenship means self-expression. I think the key to citizenship means listening, and
