Home » society » hypocrisy and pride in frederick andrews

Hypocrisy and pride in frederick andrews

In his book, Joseph Andrews, Henry Fielding uses numerous type characters to create a épigramme on the addictions of guys, finding that, “The only supply of the true Ridiculous¦is affectation,  which “proceeds from one of these two causes, vanity or perhaps hypocrisy¦ (Fielding 10). The two of these chief vices reveal themselves through the words and phrases, actions, and lifestyles of several of Fielding’s characters, some in more benign forms than others, and often coming hand in hand.

A glowing example of hypocrisy is shown while Mister.

Adams is definitely travelling with a gentleman who gives a striking discourse in courage and “the infamy of not being ready all the time to sacrifice our lives to the country.  During his lecture, the screams of a woman will be heard, and Mr. Adams reaches for any weapon to assist. The guy is stunned and, shaking, says, “This is no business of ours; let us make as much rush as possible out of the way, or we may fall into their particular hands ourselves (115).

As Adams dashes off to the woman’s aid, the “man of courage goes out to his own home, “without once searching behind him,  the place that the author leaves him to “contemplate his own braveness, and to peine the wish of it in others (115).

However , Mr. Adams can be not him self altogether positive, and, even though perhaps even more harmless, demonstrates a uncovering combination of vanity and hypocrisy. Adams is generally found producing a vain display of his learning and analyzing the quality of others’ educations, frequently speaking in Latin and chastising others for not performing according to the Scriptures. He makes himself silly with his substantial opinion of his achievements. When the persona Wilson relates his life’s tale, Adams searches for a sermon this individual wrote on the subject of vanity, declaring it thus admirable that he would walk five mls to retrieve it. He claims he had “never been a larger enemy to any passion than that silly one of counter (181),  thus revealing his very own hypocritical inclination for vanity.

Fielding as well makes a great intentional screen of pride by inserting a story in the story: “The History of Leonora.  Leonora is a gorgeous young lady, heir to a bundle of money, with a “greedy appetite of vanity, together with the preference which has been given her by the guys to some other woman¦(84).

Not long following Leonora features settled on a suitor to marry than her take pleasure in is tested by the presence of a excellent stranger being released on the in a “dear coach and six.  She in the end concedes to his appealing riches, question her previous lover, yet her dad refuses to give his bundle of money while he lives, and her fresh lover leaves. Thus the vanity of Leonora leaves her alone as the miserable subject matter of ridicule.

One hypocritical character whom enters, most likely solely with regards to his sarcastic behavior, may be the Roman Catholic priest came across by Mr. Adams in an inn. The gentleman gives a lecture around the value of riches, declaring, “Do not really riches lead us solicitude rather than rest, jealousy instead of minauderie, and danger instead of basic safety?  (214). But , simply no sooner offers he done his speech on the evils of wealth, than he asks Adams for a loan to fund his lodgings, and eventually asks the host to pay his debt later on.

The web host points out the hypocrisy, declaring, “I thought by his talking a whole lot about riches, that he previously a hundred pounds a least in his pocket (216). However the scene is usually not complete without Adams adding his own hypocrisy; he chides the web host for his suspicions and then retires to bed without a thought as to how he will probably pay his own debts.

Through these kinds of instances and many others, Fielding purposefully and humorously exemplifies the vices of vanity and hypocrisy. His ridiculous, flawed characters, all their actions and lifestyles, and in many cases the tales they inform are fresh with patterns of these traits, to the point of absurdity. But it may be the painfully preposterous that Fielding uses to create hypocrisy and vanity towards the reader’s attention and show what vices they truly will be.

you

< Prev post Next post >