1 ) Do you think the jury with this movie found the right decision? Why/why certainly not?
I think that the jury from this movie reached the wrong decision, because I feel that all throughout the deliberation the factual evidence did not have any fair doubt lingering above it, which was the complete opposite of the opinion of juror eight, and steadily everyone else. During your time on st. kitts was factual evidence shown, juror almost 8 persuaded every one of the rest of the jurors at the end to disregard the forensics, and to assume, speculate suppose, imagine their own hypotheses, by blatantly stating “what if queries persuading almost all jurors to a unanimous decision.
2 . Did the opinion of the case change since the movie advanced, or achieved it stay the same through the entire motion picture? Explain.
My opinion of the case changed as the movie progressed, and did not stay throughout the entire movie. At the start I felt that the teenage boy was guilty and the facts were too obvious and clear, but slowly and gradually I was thus fascinated by juror 8’s common sense and his thinking ability, this got myself interested and swayed my personal vote for “not guilty I actually also thought what juror 8 was saying by his tone of voice, which was crystal clear and rhetorical.
This individual showed the panel a rough estimate on how long it would take for the daddy to acquire stabbed, walk with a sagging, and still demand help.
several. Juror almost 8 made the statement, “Prejudice obscures the fact. Which usually character(s) structured their decisions on misjudgment? Explain. Juror 10 is among the most hurtful and prejudice of the all the jurors a quote to demonstrate this is “Now you’re not likely to tell us that we’re likely to believe that youngster, knowing what he can. Listen, We’ve lived between ’em all my life. Weight loss believe anything they say. I am talking about, they’re born liars. When he says this this individual means/believes that folks are given birth to in slums are created to live lives of criminal offense and disseat, even thou juror your five was born and lived in a slum most his lifestyle heis a perfectly respectable person. This demonstrates that juror 10 was wrong and folks born in slums not necessarily born to lie and commit criminal offenses.
4. So why do you think Juror 3 kept out so very long before changing his brain at the end?
Juror 3 may be the last to alter his brain because of his grudge against kids; this grudge among him and his son acquired stemmed from a fight and immediately his son remaining home and has never viewed him much more than 2 yrs. Ever since that incident juror 3 has had a personal dislike against children which is evident when juror 3 says “‘that goddamn rotten child, I know him, what they’re like. Them to you. How they kill you daily. My Our god, don’t you see? How come Now i am the only one who also sees? Jeez, I can believe that knife moving in. ‘ This proves that juror several thinks he knows every kid in the whole world and knows that they are really disrespectful and unthankful. Nevertheless by the end of deliberation when he was the lone man voting guilty, having been overwhelmed with pressure by the jurors wonderful bottled feelings for his son that instantly emerge, realizing that this individual cannot treat the young boy like his child, and thus take care of him fairly.
5. Do this video provide an appropriate depiction of jury deliberation? Explain. The deliberation was for genuine entertainment but also superb acting was presented by jurors as they showed the atmosphere within a deliberation room, as the testimony of countless jurors in real life clarify that they are very anxious to leave and even quickly go home, who might listen to a case for days. This kind of jurors like juror 3 took remarks and known evidence and factual info, though it is quite uncommon for jurors to consider notes, it really is legal and shows that several can remember when other will be better to create things down. But a single scene that rang an alarm personally is when juror almost eight brought out the similar blade used in the crime picture, to show “that anyone could have put a knife with the crime picture. This individual should have recently been kicked from the jury as soon as he went out and bought the knife. By law, juries are not in order to conduct their particular investigations, of course, if the different jurors got just reported Juror No .
8 for this, he’d have been completely replaced by an alternate. Yes, it’s awesome for characters in a video to take the law intotheir individual hands. In real life, you love to leave responsibilities like that to individuals who have many years of training and law enforcement experience. Even with that, Juror No . 8’s whole line of reasoning is usually wrong for almost every step. According to the law, it is the jury’s work to determine the veracity of the facts presented, as ” never to question and interpret the evidence any way they will choose and make crazy assumptions about witnesses. As an example, you don’t simply dismiss blood evidence since “probably planted unless you happen to be presented with facts that it continues to be planted.
Also, you can’t just hand-wave apart jury account based on, “There were indents on her nostril.
six. Rotten Tomato vegetables gave this movie a 100% rating. Are you shocked? Was this kind of warranted? We am not surprised that Rotten Tomatoes gave this kind of movie completely rating; it is a very one of a kind movie which has only doze characters and one setting, which usually captures a complex-riddled conversation using rhetorical, logical, metaphorical schemes and a bundle of jaw-dropping performing by Holly Fonda.
However in my opinion, I might rate this kind of movie a 92% rating because even though we learned in rules class within the responsibilities and process in jury work and deliberation many moments would show the opposite which caught my personal attention, although I understand that some parts were made to capture the audience’s attention throughout the movie, which indeed they were doing and had to tweak the facts.
you
