Compare and Contrast ‘Perseus holding the top of Medusa’ with Parmigianincfs ‘Madonna in the Long The neck and throat Benevuto Cellini’s statue of ‘Perseus keeping the Head of Medusa’ (Figure 1) and Parmigianinds portrait ‘Madonna of the long throat (Figure 2) are both prime examples of Mannerist art. The Mannerists searched for to place a refined, idealized and stylish visual style with arcane, complicated iconography to create artworks of complexness and elegance.
This essay will certainly discuss hoe both performers differ in technique nd will display a compare between the extremely political relevance of Cellini’s statue and Parmigianinds religious painting.
During my discussion I will also explore how both designers comparatively choose their own ‘maniera’ as they wilfully complicate the narrative of their traditional subjects. The portrait and the écharpe focus on the idealization from the human number, symbolism, precise and implied sexual content material all to improve the Mannerist complexity of the art.
Ultimately this essay will conclude just how both art works intensify the emotional drama or put literary or perhaps isual recommendations so experienced viewers needed to work hard to decipher the meaning.
Benevuto Cellini’s dureté statue of Perseus together with the head of Medusa stands on a rectangular base inside the Loggia dei Lanzi of the Piazza della Signoria in Florence. The main topic of his work is derived from the mythological history of Perseus beheading Medusa. The contact of male and female, successful versus vanquished and oppression versus clampdown, dominance are the fundamental themes with this statue, which will at the time of its creation had a deep political meaning.
Parmigianinds oil portrait Madonna with the Long Neck of the guitar dates coming from 1 535 ” 1540 and was commissioned as an reproduction for the church of Santa Karen dei Servi in Parma. The subject of this kind of painting originates from Christianity: Mary holding Christ. The piece of art has religious significance as it was created for a chapel, obviously dedicated to the Virgin Martha. Although Cellini’s sculpture and Parmigianinds art work were commissioned in different parts of Italy, their different places remain highly important in their Cellini uses the lost-wax method and treats the act of modelling, and cautiously manipulates the soft materials into a heroic act.
Perseus steps forwards, his mind bowed, right arm flexed, left arm increased with the truncated body of Medusa beneath him. By simply sculpting other slim, rotating, and fleshless creatures including his Narcissus (Figure 3), Cellini follows Michelangelds rendition of the idealized human contact form and thus uses High Renaissance examples to express his fresh ideals. The sculpture ‘seems designed to push the fgural members together with the greatest possible invention’l demonstrating Cellini’s creative skills in the imaginative advancement the écharpe.
Cellini manufactured the conscious decision to work in this kind of medium because by ouring molten metallic into the solid, ‘he was vivifying the sculpture with life-giving blood’2. Cole’s suggestion is an example of Cellini’s keen artistry wonderful confidence confound in the process of making the écharpe. The smooth sending your line of Perseus’ face is nearly identical to that particular of Donatello’s bronze David, an evident indication that Cellini was following a canonical Renaissance method to reflect the idea of an attractive face. Medusa’s head is also idealised: her sensuous skin area contrasts her snake-like curly hair, thus confusing the narrative of the sculpture.
The somewhat lithe legant athletic thin form of Perseus corresponds to the dominant aesthetic of the time. In accordance to Charles Avery this kind of elegant easy poise was your hallmark of Mannerist Art’3, and thus the smoothness in the limbs and Cellini’s great finishes identify his sculpture as a qualified work of Mannerist fine art. Parmigianino however adopts the oil portrait technique for his altarpiece. In preparation to get the work Parmigianinds numerous drawings reveal the way the reproduction developed coming from conventional beginnings to a one of a kind end’. ‘The drawings for the Pop-queen of he Long The neck and throat represent ‘an exemplary example of the evolution of the artist’s ideas equally with regard to concerns of form and content’S. The ‘Study for Pop-queen of the Long Neck Red Chalk heightened with white’ (Figure 4) is a suitable example to back up this as Parmigianino drawings an almost similar figure of the Madonna with similar signals. The beginnings of Christ’s form are obvious: splayed across her lap, his legs become visible. Inside the painting, the Madonna is larger than life-size in comparison to the attendants to the left with the composition.
1
