Clearly, Cambodia was the winner of the watch case. According to the 62 judgement, by simply nine votes to three, the court discovers that the forehead of Preah Vihear is the situation in territory within the sovereignty of Cambodia. Hence, Thailand is usually under a duty to pull away any army or police forces, or other pads stationed by simply her on the temple, or perhaps in its area on Cambodian territory. Likewise, by several votes to five, Thailand is underneath an obligation to revive to Cambodia any statues, steals, pieces of typical monuments, sandstone model and historical pottery which might, since the day of the profession of the temple by Asia in 1954, have been taken out of the serenidad or the forehead area simply by Thai regulators. Noticeably, this kind of decision was performed by judge Tanaka and judge Morelli in a joint declaration, and, other important people simply by appended individual opinions and dissenting views (Temple of Preah Vihear, 1962).
Additionally , the court provides declared the victory of Cambodia basic for couple of reasons. Initially, the all judges have declined Thailand’s state by proclaiming that it’s not really convincing enough. As include stated previously mentioned, Thailand stated that she has by no means accepted the map or, alternatively, if she acquired accepted that she acquired done so only because of a mistaken belief the fact that frontier mentioned corresponded with the watershed range. However , the claim was not sensible enough, seeing that these roadmaps were used by Siamese officials over years. Although a survey among 1934-1935 was produced displaying the Forehead as being in Thailand, the lady had however continued to use and publish maps displaying Preah Vihear as resting in Cambodia. Furthermore, the map was given wide publicity and was given to the leading geographical societies in important countries, and to the Siamese legations licensed to the English, German, Russian and United States Governments. By simply all the wide publicity, Thailand has no justification that they did not accept the map. In addition, the mix commission has been meeting for many instances in Asia to discuss the map. Through the negotiations intended for the 1925 and 1937 Franco-Siamese Treaties, which proved the existing frontiers, and in 1947 in Wa before the Franco-Siamese Conciliation Commission rate, it would had been natural intended for Thailand to make the matter, although she did not do so.
On top of that, Siamese Minister from the Interior, Knight in shining armor Damrong, Siamese provincial governors, and Siamese members with the Mixed Commission rate are some of which knew of Preah Vihear, but they performed say practically nothing regarding the map either then or for quite some time. So , they must be kept to have acknowledged the map. If the Siamese authorities accepted the Annex I map without analysis, they could not now beg any problem vitiating the actual of their approval. Based on these types of facts, the court figured Thailand experienced accepted the Annex I map (ICJ 1962, 2013). Having approved the map, mean that Asia must agree to the fact that Preah Vihear temple is situated under Cambodia’s territory mainly because Cambodia is using the Annex I map as the claim in this case. Therefore, Cambodia features finally reported as the winner.
