Excerpt from Term Paper:
More importantly, however , modern-day realists differ from Nightingale in four key areas, those of theistic supposition, methods of analysis, determinism, and naturalism. When contemporary realists certainly accept Nightingale’s position that merely realizing truth is not enough, and this actions based on findings is very important (Porter, 2001), Nightingale inserted a certain presumption of God into her realistic views that modern realism prevents. Whereas Nightingale supported the style that mans actions were dictated simply by God, modern day realists recognize specific nontheistic causes to get behaviors.
Second of all, Nightingale depended solely on quantitative way of research, seeing that such methods were many available in her period. This kind of methods, relating to the scientific, external, specific id of patterns of situations, are useful, although modern realists understand the requirement for individualistic knowledge of information. While Nightingale’s focus was upon identifying the patterns of relationships, modern realists target more about understanding individuals relationships (Porter, 2001).
Third, modern realists differ a bit from Nightingale in their thoughts about determinism. As discussed, Nightingale believed strongly in determinism, and believed no authentic free will of tendencies existed (Porter, 2001). Modern day realists, however , focus not merely on the habits for patterns, rather than inescapable patterns of relationships (Porter, 2001). In this manner, modern realists allow for versatility in causing, whereas nightingale’s hard deterministic stance would not.
Finally, contemporary realists identify a unity between causation of interpersonal structure and natural composition. Whereas Nightingale held a naturalistic opinion that cultural and organic events happen due to the same causation factors, modern realists see the two independently, in this social set ups are the reaction to human action, while natural events arise due to normal law (Porter, 2001). As human actions is interpretable, such a belief fractures the naturalistic viewpoint.
Understanding these variations in realism opinions is vital to nursing practice. While Nightingale’s harsh realistic look was appropriate in her time period, due to a dependence on theology and quantitative methods, this kind of concepts happen to be outdated, and should be turned down in modern nursing. Although theological perspectives are important, comprehending the basis of causing outside this kind of a règle is vital to understanding modern day causation of events, and therefore, modern medical concepts. The interpretable actions of individuals, beyond deterministic opinions, is vital to understanding individuals in the modern grow older, and is hence necessary to comprehending the structures, best practice rules, diseases, and atmospheres of recent man. Further more, the break between interpersonal and natural law is important, in that all-natural law can be not subjective. In order to fully comprehend triggers and associated with specific nursing concepts, this understanding of several levels of causation is necessary.
Porter (2001) proves his document by noting the influence Nightingale’s philosophy has had on modern breastfeeding. While some critics have downplayed this influence, Porter is definitely accurate in his analysis. He stresses the admitted limits of her philosophy, just like her dependence on theological and faith based aspects and quantitative research methods, due to the time period through which she lived, but likewise stresses the value of her focus on the beginnings of any realistic approach to nursing and medicine. This individual points to Nightingale’s insistence upon deeper reasons behind illness and health, her focus on statistics as a means of measurement, and her linkage of simple fact and value. In this, Assurer refers to the idea of understanding not merely the disease as well as the etiology of disease, yet also any potential problems of those with disease as well as the social belief systems with the population. Put simply, according to Porter, Nightingale’s philosophy not merely stresses the importance of health, but likewise of the sociable and personal implications of health on each person (Porter, 2001).
Clearly, Porter’s analysis is definitely accurate. In looking at the role of nursing in the care of young pregnant girl, one can obviously recognize Nightingale’s philosophical impacts. First, Nightingale would pressure the importance of how such a condition is shown and attained. In contemporary nursing, the understanding of the entire process of pregnancy and the likely complications of this condition on the younger female is vital to the care of this kind of a patient. This can be a positivist scientism role at the same time.
However , in addition to comprehending the basic state, nurses likewise must understand how the youthful teens experience their being pregnant. Understanding how every individual feels about her condition is likewise vital for the care of the patient. In understanding the many ways in which persons respond to their particular pregnancy, rns can learn how to better assist others in similar scenarios, thus bringing out the deterministic approach.
Furthermore, nurses need to understand the cultural ramifications and causes for particular viewpoints regarding teenage pregnant state. In order to completely treat and understand a patient, the doctor must figure out societal buildings and how those structures enhance false philosophy, in addition to understanding the principles of this kind of beliefs. In the case of the pregnant teen, you can clearly see that, in American societies, these kinds of a condition is definitely believed simply by society being one of pity, since this sort of a condition suggests promiscuity and a lack of secure sexual methods. These demeaning beliefs have an effect on the behaviors of the patient, in that this kind of a social stigma may, in itself, create several manifestations of complications and irregularities during the pregnant state. It is only simply by understanding the clinical, deterministic, naturalistic, and sociable aspects of well being that complete care could be achieved, and this paradigm is, at least in part, founded on the principles organized by Nightingale.
Nightingale’s firm belief in statistical examination as a technique of determining causing, her insistence on root causes of health issues and health, and a strong belief in scientific understanding as a basis for overall health, are plainly guidelines in modern remedies. Further, her instance that sociology takes on an important position in health care has been vastly influential in modern nursing. Many in health care possess moved beyond simply trying to medicate the ill, and possess begun to pay attention to underlying reasons for health related issues, and on how you can treat the complete individual. Together scholar known, “Observation, not merely chemistry, must decide the care for the sick… Nightingale showed us the advantages of sympathetic remedying of each affected person as a man, with not just a body, yet a brain, and a heart. ” (Allison Bashford, 2000, pg. 137).
Recommendations
Barker, L. J., Reynolds, W., and Stevenson, C. (1999. ) The human research basis of psychiatric nursing: theory and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 25-34.
Bashford, A. (2000. ) Domestic experts: Modernity, sexuality, and the settlement of research in Aussie medicine. Diary of Female’s History, 12(2), pp. 137.
Lawler, J. Knowing the body system and embodiment: methodologies, discourses, and nursing. In L. Lawler (Ed. ), The Body in Breastfeeding (pp, 38-45). Melbourne, Churchill Livingstone.
Tenir, S. (2001. ) Nightingale’s realist viewpoint of science. Nursing Idea, 2
