Larsson and Vinberg (2010) described that management behaviour takes on a crucial role for successful organisations as well as the balance between two behaviors, task- and relations- orientation, will bring about different ideal outcomes in several situations. Leaders may use multiple leadership variations and combine the behaviors based on the situation(Oshagbemi and Ocholi, 2013). Alan combines both associations and activity behaviour ways to match the problem, influence the employees’ functionality and satisfaction of the work place to have optimum effectiveness.
Alan displays relations-oriented behaviour as he trusts his team to be efficient and independent in performing their very own respective roles with little to no supervision. This individual presents himself as a friendly and approachable boss supplying help when needed. Alan comes with his employees in making decisions to improve the business enterprise. As such, creating an environment of emotional support, warmth, justness, friendliness and trust which has earned him his employees’ trust and respect.
Despite being dominantly relationship-oriented, Alan likewise displays task-oriented behaviour. He takes care of clients when they fall off their cars, plans work schedule and assigns work to the employees. Also, he preserves performance specifications whereby you will discover standard methods and instances to perform each type of restoration task.
Alan displays participative management style in which he enjoys doing work alongside his workers. He could be usually not enquête in showing them how to proceed. Instead, gives suggestions about what could be performed or how he would include handled the difficulties. He does not use his power and authority to get work as he is friendly and approachable. Alan’s style of decision-making is Group II when he encourages his team to provide opinions in decision making.
However , Alan displays command styles based on a employees. Hersey and Blanchards Situational Management Theory centers on the leaders behavior and followers’ willingness and determine it to gauge leader effectiveness(Cairns, 1996). With Gil and Hans, Joe uses the delegating style where he entrusts them with mainly high-precision and specialists tasks which are completed quickly and with little if any errors. Bart and Herbie each specialises in different areas, thus will be more unconfident in areas they are not really specialising in. As such, Joe would make use of the participating approach, which involves less directive yet more collaborative, when coping with them. Kirk, who is retired to this work and is usually given lower-level skills jobs, Alan will have to be enquête and provide more guidance making use of the informing approach. With LaMont and Joanie, who have perform lower-level skills tasks under Alan’s advice, really does their task well and it is improving. Thus, Alan engages the advertising approach with them, in which he is directive, but shows concern for them.
Leaders do not count on a single management style, but be flexible and adjust to changing requirements. T. S i9000. and Deb. R. (2015) said that good leaders have to understand the challenging and constantly changing environment and also have a cultural influence process, seeking non-reflex participation of employees to achieve organizational goals. Despite Alan’s predominant style being participative, Alan displays an array of variations which change when controlling different people. Consequently displaying successful leadership.
During the ton, Alan got demonstrated a combination of autocratic management style and task-oriented behavior where Joe had to assign specific jobs to his workers knowing that the flash flood is definitely coming into the shop in order to avoid losing thousands of dollars in damage. Anzalone (2017) said that, a leader who is task-oriented is a innovator who fixate on the main task and everything the steps essential to accomplish the task. The best is less worried about his personnel but rather more concerned in getting the work done. Also, Alan makes decisions with certainty assuming that all of his personnel will conform but his workers did not react at once due to his original relations-oriented behaviour. Because of this, Alan was required to make his stand and assert his dominance above them to but let them realise how dire the case is.
Ram (2001) also said that, a leader that is autocratic is definitely the centre of all of the activities that happen within the organisation where he is the innovator. He uses the decision-making process and makes his own judgement when he believes his intention is superior , nor want to waste time regarding his personnel in decision-making. If Joe did incorporate everyone in the decision-making, he would have then lose out a lot of time and generate it tougher to make a decision to gain everybody and in addition incur plenty of damages.
According to Yukl and Mahsud (2010), Alan was able to assess the immediate threat to his store that his shop is going to be flooded and in course lose thousands of dollars because of the heavy downpour and participating with his personnel as he was aiding all of them in shifting the packing containers away, this kind of shows that Alan was effective in changing to the exterior changes, Alan’s leadership style and strategy all points to him being a successful head. In conclusion, Alan’s behaviour throughout the flood is acceptable because he can be adapting if the situation demands it.
