In both ‘Ozymandias’ and ‘London’, both poets highlight the theme of Fatality as a way to convey the key meaning of man power. This can be conveyed working in london where Blake talks about the death and suffering of men and women through the frequent rhyme scheme which could reflect the regularity of oppression by my own powerful creatures ‘behind building walls’. Similarly, in Ozymandias Shelley discusses the death of a civilisation by overthrowing Rameses, As suggested simply by ‘a shattered visage’. Nevertheless , despite this, due to the semantic domains displayed by poet, human being power is implied to get eroded into worthlessness (like the existing statue of the king/pharaoh) and human being power is no match to get the power of the elements.
In addition to this, both poets add a sense of somebody dominating, hence emphasising the scale of human power and as a result, someone with greater electric power occurs in both poetry. In London the rich have this upper hand against the poor which will highlights how the rich control the poor. This is certainly suggested by, ‘How the chimney-sweepers cry’ (which is almost a mocking tone). The objective of this pathos created by poet compared to Ozymandias can be showing how in one illustration, human power can end reigns of dictators, on the other hand on the other hand, man power can damage society and may create boundaries between classes as mirrored in the circumstance of the The french language Revolution. In addition, in Ozymandias the great leader (Rameses) is said to have this strength above his enemies and his personal people, however the fact that the poem is written as an roundabout, first person recount i. elizabeth. ‘I achieved a traveller’, creates the impression that humans overall have so much power, that they have made Rameses’ reign, an extremely distant recollection in ‘the antique land’ (the desert).
For me, both poets highlight the power of humans in order to express anguish at how much this electrical power has been mistreated into creating fascist communities. In Ozymandias Shelley creates about a dropped empire, a civilisation that have to have gone all downhill because finally, there is no sign of it while suggested by the alliterative language of ‘boundless and bare’. In London Blake tells us the fact that poorer people of this city are going through a bad as well as their disposition has decreased like Ozymandiass empire, but in this case London, uk has not collapsed. Blake shows that as the rich hide ‘behind structure walls’, there is a colossal moral decline with ‘harlots’ and an overall melancholy and gothic tone we. e. ‘hearse’. Furthermore, Blake writes about how precisely London experienced drifted to a time of lower income and disease due to the human being power of dictators that are to cowardice to see what their city is now i. electronic. ‘Marks of weakness, markings of woe’. Linked to this kind of quote, human being power is likewise conveyed to become evil by poet below as it is a good example of degradation as well as the oxymoron of ‘Marriage hearse’. Whilst the powerful want, as connoted by ‘Marriage’, the oppressed are sad, as connoted by ‘hearse’, and this can be described as recurring theme which suggests the fact that poor ought to have to be and will always be appeared down upon.
Subsequent, the two poetry, both offer a feeling of depression and despair to the target audience suggesting that excessive man power results in a complete scarring of a setting. Shelley emphasises different types of symbolism to create this kind of effect including: ‘The hand that laughed at them plus the hearts that fed’, thus suggesting that people were almost forced to do acts they did not want to, just so the king could become more corrupt as a result of individual power. Additionally
Blake publishes articles about how everybody is sad and weak following being oppressed as proven with ‘marks of woe’ and ‘blights with plagues’, which claim that powerful people result in a loss of basic ideals such as taking care of others.
I believe that great world of one is perhaps that many important motif linked to man power in both poetry. For instance: In Ozymandias the king demonstrates he is arrogant, by dialling himself the ‘King of kings’ within the pedestal. This individual also expresses how great and powerful a ruler he can with ‘look on my works’. This quotation is significant in the poem as a whole in my opinion because it displays how power corrupts and distorts your brain into pondering everything about him is excellent due to his own doing, where as it is only good as they ruined others’ lives in forming everything for him! Similarly, working in london, the selfishness of the house of worship compares to this kind of as man power features autonomy over who enters- which is incorrect as suggested by ‘black’ning Church appals’ of the poor and oppressed in society.
However , to conclude, the poems vary with regards to human power in London, as the rich betray the poor, mainly because they have place their brand on everything as though they own it and in Ozymandias the sculptor betrays the king when the statue is being made by mocking him and implying that he has no legacy ‘colossal wreck, never-ending and bare, the single and level sands stretch far away’. Because of this, I strongly believe that on the whole, equally poets try to convey the message that human electric power is fine, but excessive can tainted anyone and ruin the lives of numerous people through slavery or perhaps inequality such as as emphasised by the bumpy rights with the poor and the rich split as well as the Ruler who instructions people to be employed by him.
