Excerpt coming from Term Daily news:
The Mayans believed a land called Mu when existed above the waves and this when that civilization droped below the area, the survivors created the Mayan people (Hancock, Underworld: The Mysterious Roots of World 73). Within their creation story, the Mayans place Mu in the Pacific cycles as a region that pre-dates the Atlantis story. Relating to a translated Mayan Codec, the Property of Mu, like Atlantis, had been the center of significant social, technological, religious, and cultural thought – it was, unlike Atlantis, an ideal place. When Mu fell throughout a massive geological upheaval, it is people were capable to escape to the continent of what is now South America and created the Mayan civilization – one of the most complicated and significant of the old civilizations on the Americas.
Mu has been since taken up with what can only always be loosely called New Age copy writers using it to link the modern life to ancient and maybe alien roots.
In the Tamil (Indian) customs, an island strikingly just like Mu and Atlantis been around in what is now called the Indian Ocean, called Lemuria. Interestingly, although Lemuria is usually part of Tamil legend, the concept of it was truly popularized by English biogeologists taking up Darwin’s work and using this famous island because the explanatory place between your existence of particular kinds throughout the whole oceanic place. Again, though, Lemuria’s unique existence was as a man civilization – one that, along with one other sunken terrain in Tamil legend “Kumari Kandam, inches were countries that had been part of the Indian sub-continent that with time became overloaded by the marine (Hancock 18). These reputations claim an ancient landmass that connected Down under to India.
The problem with these geographical and geological tales, yet , is that they simply fail to stand up to our modern day understanding of Platter Tectonics – a debunking argument that is made afterwards.
In addition to the Ancient greek, Mayan, and Indian tales of the Lost Continent, various other mythological countries have been promoted throughout history. But in this last category, mostly thinking about a dropped or “undiscovered” civilization is little more than an mental exercise (Hope 17). In trying to explore the ideas that condition and make tales in the Lost Place, using contemporary fiction is a completely useless exercise – anyone can make up a tale, anyone can easily assert anything if they use the right words and phrases in the right way.
That which we need to build is this, can we trust old accounts of any land and folks that nobody can prove is available, that there is no true historic record of, that is out there only in the context of legend and supposition?
Let us take misconception and tale for what they may be – unsubstantiated ideas used to explain a particular aspect of individual life. Various Lost Continent myths are creation common myths – this is one way our people got here stories. As such, they are very easily debunked whenever we understand the extremely tangible scientific research of menu tectonics. Geologists have some rather to-the-point things say with this topic- “let me just briefly which there is no such thing as being a sunken region, ” (Erlingsson Karlen, Atlantis from a Geographer’s Point of view 27). Wait, it can not be that simple. Must be geologist says that there is no sunken country does which make it so? Does that simply debunk the millennia of popular believed on the subject? Most likely a further explanation is necessary:
After the advent of profound sea analysis… there is no for a longer time any space for doubt. We know zero how marine bottoms happen to be formed through plate tectonics, and we understand the morphology from the oceans in significant fine detail. There is simply no room for just about any sunken place in the oceans. A shed continent, nevertheless, is quite an additional cup of tea, inch (Erlingsson Karlen, 27-28).
What these two geologists are discussing is the basic tenet of plate tectonics, that at one time nearly all of the land in the earth that stood in harbor was 1 massive country -a central island where existed nearly every part of the known geological universe. Over billions of years, the tectonic dishes (large overlapping puzzle bits of the Globe’s curst that move and shift in answer to stresses of increasing and slipping temperatures, magma, and other forces) caused the breakup of Pangaea (Joseph 112). With this account, a continent that will have been when part of an additional, that pennyless off and shifted under the surface with the ocean in a series of occasions taking place over millions of years, could be possible – the type of place is a southern and western areas of California, western world of the San Andreas fault, which, it really is theorized, will one day divided the majority of that state removed from the rest of the Us (Colins, 3).
Charles Pellegrino’s work Unearthing Atlantis: A great Archaeological Odyssey to the Fabled Lost World, wrote that evidence of associated with burying entire places below mudslides, volcanic ash, and also other such lesions is quite feasible (Pellegrino 249). In checking geologic occasions between known effects of streaming magma (which can make substantial tunnels beneath ground mainly because it bores through or just within the surface) plus the force of volcanic lesions, and the sort of Pompeii, it might be entirely possible that an entire city could be buried or maybe sink below the surface in the water. This kind of however , does not prove the existence of Atlantis, Lemuria, Mu or any type of other Misplaced or Sunken continents. What succeeds to do is creating the possibility for part of a continent to obtain broken away or shifted below the surface as the tectonic plates tilt, or for the burying of a city – but is not itself evidence or perhaps proof.
Devoid of argument, there are many different things to be found on the sea floor. Countless thousands of delivers and their millions of artifacts included therein include fallen under the waves. Pompeii proves that the entire town can be easily wiped under the area of the globe in a matter of minutes. Earthquakes, tsunamis and other associated with nature can be used to explain a great uncountable quantity of disappearances and destruction (Haven 34). however do these kinds of support the idea of Atlantis? Can we prove a bad? Can we decisivelydefinitively, determinately, once and for all, once for all prove that Atlantis, or any of the other legendary royaume, did not are present? In short, not necessarily. but , we must always apply a true medical eye – we simply cannot measure the spiritual. Therefore , we all cannot show or disprove God clinically. We cannot weigh or perhaps carbon-date something which we terribly lack in front of us – therefore we are unable to prove that a vase, hard shard, or utensil identified is definitely Atlantean.
Graham Hancock asserts that Atlantis, Lemuria, Mu, are typical distinct possibilities. In his operate to explore the legends of Lemuria, he checked out a particularly one of a kind and apparently man-made structure in the water off of the coastline of Bengal.
Because the samples we took found no organic and natural materials which can be dates simply by carbon 18 and no art that could be dated by thermoluminescence or by type. We certainly have only rock which cannot be dated in any meaningful sense. Except by simply one component – which is that the structure is now under 23 yards of water, (Hancock 6).
We can find evidence of these kinds of structures, right off the shoreline of many places – constructions that are both simply the response to tectonic movement, or are oftentimes human in origin. however as Hancock pointed out – there is no way to prove or disprove human creation in the majority of these illustrations.
The truth about the Lost Country is that there is not any truth. Showing a negative is harder than writing an imagined account or perhaps believing a myth. Whatever we have to do is look at the options – may an entire continent have sunk beneath the sea? No, because tectonic plates do not switch in accurately that manner. Could a coastal town have at some point tilted in to the ocean during platonic changes? Probably not since the billions of years it requires for these kinds of shifts predate humanity. Could a world have been developed upon a soft strata of earth and sunk into the ground or perhaps been hidden by ash or lava? Certainly. But the truth is that not one of these proves or disproves Atlantis.
References
Collins, Claire
Gateway to Atlantis: The Search for the origin of a Dropped Civilization. Carroll Graf Publishers, 1st Release, New York
Erlingsson Ulf and Wibjorn Karlen.
Atlantis from a Geographer’s Perspective. Lindorm Publishing, Oslo.
Flem-Ath, Flanke and Lieu noir Wilson.
The Atlantis Formula: Unlocking the Ancient Insider secrets of a Long-Lost Civilization. Delta, Chicago.
Forsyth, Phyllis Sumado a.
1980 Atlantis: The Producing of Fantasy. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Hancock, Graham
Underworld: The Mystical Origins of Civilizations. 3 Rivers Press, New York.
Dreamland, Kendall
Magic of the Sea (Wonders of Nature: Natural Phenomena in Science and Myth). Libraries Unlimited, Ithaca.
Hope
