Excerpt from Term Paper:
A conclusion – by the very mother nature of lifestyle and humankind, humans tend to be group animals – they thrive in organizations, coalesce in to groups, without a doubt, the very technique of moving by hunter-gatherer to cities was part of a bunch behavior. Group norms will be internal rulings that are and then individuals so the synergistic effect of the group will be more effective. These ideals usually focus on the way people of that group look and behavior to themselves, and the hierarchical composition they tend to build to “police” their efforts. Norms help groups fix problems, determine and treat new scenarios, make better decisions, and even procedure their daily work. Groups, in this case users of the medical community, join these teams in order to echo specific thoughts and values associated with the overall group. Ordre behavior in the medical field is usually covered by a willingness to aid, to “do no injury, ” and to provide the greatest solutions to the set of conditions given. There exists a clear difference in problems in which a individual expires due to inadequate gear, prior condition, or even simply no apparent specialized medical reason if all procedures were followed to the best of the caregiver’s ability – and an instance in which due to substance abuse or perhaps other incompetencies the wrong medication is purchased or a thing surgical is usually mishandled. Hence, all errors are not negligence; and all mistakes are not purposeful or the effect of a lack of focus or incompetence (Kohn, Corrigan and Donaldson, 2000)
Usually, in the medical industry, errors happen to be attributed to blunders made by people who may be penalized for those errors. Typically, the approach is usually to correct the error(s), produce a new pair of rules and extra checking methods within the system, hopefully protecting against area. Nevertheless , a newer unit for improvement, based on the Total Quality Management Programs in operation, takes a several approach. Through this model, the focus is in identification of the underlying program defects that allow the chance for an error to even take place. Then, instead of placing a Band-Aid on a trouble that currently exists, systems are in position so that errors do not happen in the first place. This approach also requires into consideration the holistic environment of proper care; the medical personnel, people, physical environment, and available technology (Dewar, 2010; Peratec, 1995).
While there is no very clear solution to the condition of medical error, the systems are simply too complex to guarantee a 0% problem margin, we are able to perhaps move from looking at all medical error as incompetence, and start to see more of a systematic paradigm of health-related in which all sides take satisfactory responsibility for own tasks, including the individual, and realize that there basically are no warranties when it comes to sophisticated biological systems. Honest reporting of problems would go a considerable ways to identifying the real mother nature of the issue, but in this sort of a litigious society, it is difficult to believe that complete openness in errors is likely. Rather, perhaps the medical industry can use some of the security and error prevention techniques from the flying industry: assure the person’s informed consent policy is apparent and comprehensive; encourage second opinions upon many diagnoses; perform frequent root cause and TQM assessments on types of procedures; reevaluate devices (computer and human) pertaining to synergy; medical center accreditation; and a system in which errors happen to be reported accurately (Error Disclosure, 2009).
Bibliography
Physicians Want to Learn from Medical Mistakes. (2008, January 9). Retrieved Nov 2010, via Agency for Healthcare Research and Top quality: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/press/pr2008/errepsyspr.htm
Problem Disclosure. (2009, March). Gathered from Company for Health-related Research and Quality: http://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer.aspx?primerID=2
Improving Many Hosptials. (2010, March). Recovered November 2010, from the Joint Commission’s Total annual Report on Quality and Safety: http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/D60136A2-6A59-4009-A6F3-04E2FF230991/0/2010_Annual_Report.pdf
Dewar, D. (2010). Necessities of Health Economics. Phila., PA: Roberts and Bartlett.
Epidemiology of Medical Error. (2000). United kingdom Medical Log, 320(7237), 774-81.
Hayward and Hofer. (2001). Estimating Hosptial Deaths As a result of Medical Errors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(2), 415-20.
Johnson, S. (2007). Making Up Is difficult to Do. The hastings Centre Report, 37(2), 45+.
Kohn, Corrigan and Donaldson. (2000, June). To Err Is usually Human. Recovered November 2010, from the Nationwide Academies Press: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9728
Peratec. (1995). Total Quality Supervision: The Key to Business Improvement. London: Chapman and Lounge.
Rathert, Fleigh-Palmer and Palmer. (2006). Minimizing Medical Errors: A Qualitative Analysis of Health Care Providers’ Views on Imrproving Safety. Diary of Applied management, 11(2), 44+.
