It really is interesting to notice, before anything at all, the similarities between Fearless New World and 1984. Firstly and somewhat obviously, they are both prophetic works of fiction, they were both written in turbulent occasions, both struggling changes that can revert the future of the world.
When ever 1984 was written, the earth had merely gotten away of a second war as well as the surprising surge of communism and their totalitarian government was frightening the majority of the western world. In George Orwell’s novel, the main concern seems to be the ruling of a great, socialist totalitarian government/dictatorship.
Alternatively, when Fearless New World was written, the world had just been swept by a wave of mass production and consumerism, which too can be reflected in Aldous Huxley’s ultra-modern, test-tube baby, sleep-taught society.
That is exactly what the actual two books so equally and so different at the same time. To begin with both experts forecast a society of obedience and compliance, although on one hand, the Brave ” new world ” is also driven by consumerism and substantial advanced technology and drug abuse (soma, to ensure the pleasure of the masses), ‘Now- such is definitely progress- the old men work, the old males copulate, the old men have no time, no leisure from satisfaction, not a moment to take a seat and think- or even by some unlucky chance this sort of a crevice of time should yawn in the solid substance of their disruptions, there is always a few, delicious soma half a gramme for half a holiday [¦] returning whenever they find themselves on the other side of the crevice, safe for the solid earth of daily labour and distraction¦’.
Although 1984 can be described as bare, war stricken place with meals rations etc, “Outside, possibly through the shut window-pane, the world looked frosty. Down the street very little eddies of wind had been whirling dirt and ripped papers into spirals, and though the sun was shinning and the sky was blue, generally there seemed to be zero colour in anything, besides in the paper prints that were desperate everywhere.
Both novels also identical in the aspect that most inhabitants do not manage to see a problem with the world they will live in, many comply and obey, in Brave New World, most consume, but in both novels, you will discover the strange sheep. In Brave ” new world ” Bernard Marx, ‘But he’s thus ugly! ‘ [¦] ‘And then sosmall. ‘ Fanny rebels because he does not easily fit into made a grimace; smallness was so horribly and typically low-caste. In 1984, Winston Smith rebels because he would not accept, “to the future and also the past, to a time once thought is usually free, once men differ from one another , nor live alone- to a period when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone. From the regarding uniformity, from the age of isolation, form the associated with Big Brother, in the age of doublethink-“. says Winston.
Both new seem to represent societies divided into castes, in 1984 you will find three of those the ‘proles’, the ‘outer Party’ as well as the ‘inner Party’, the ‘proles’ are the misleading masses, the ‘outer party’ are the method working category, and the ‘inner party’ would be the controllers. In Brave ” new world “, the castes are a bit more literal, four in total, Alphas, intelligent and beautiful, have high positions, Betas, not quite as ‘perfect’ because the Puissance, Gammas, section of the uneducated world and finally Epsilons, similar in IQ to oysters, the workers and cleaners.
Both works of fiction can be viewed as ‘novels that changed history’, that is, after they were written it looked like that things were went in the way that the two novels stated, and some persons considered that it was the works of fiction that ‘opened people’s eyes’ and confirmed them the way in which. However , a number of other people seemed to think that both were evenly extreme to acquire actually concretized themselves.
1
