Excerpt from Essay:
Fracking
While “fracking” (hydraulic fracturing) undoubtedly poses some major financial and commercial benefits to get America (described by Seamus as the Saudi Arabia of natural gas), the practice still postures a number of concerns as well as potential threats to both the environment and the overall health of mankind. The question that advocates of fracking would prefer persons to inquire is whether or perhaps not this is a viable option to oil intake – a fair question. However, reasonably concerned individuals really should not be afraid might at what cost fracking will come to Americans – as well as others around the world if the practice be a little more popular in coming years. The cost-benefit ratio can be complicated regarding fracking by the lack of scientific studies performed that may address some of the more important questions regarding the practice – such as, what happens to the chemicals shot into the the planet during the method that do certainly not return to the surface? As McLendon points out, “no study has ever displayed where the snooze end up” (360). This paper displays why, as a result of lack of info regarding the effects of fracking around the environment and on the health of mankind, fracking really should not be supported or implemented to the extent – in spite of the economic benefits it may possess for strength consumers.
Since Banerjee displays, natural gas development has coincided with the toxins of moving water in Tx. While research workers and politicians are at probabilities about whether or not the finding of methane in drinking water wells is related to fracking or in case the methane is the result of natural deposits nearby the aquifers, the idea that Banerjee makes is the fact there are way too many unknowns pertaining to fracking being considered safe practice at this moment in time. Without a doubt, the idea that fracking can be advertised as a correctly safe process so long as the proper precautions are taken is comparable to suggesting that a sophomore secondary school student is definitely prepared to work a nuclear reactor as they did a great 8-page paper on Fukushima. The scientific studies simply have certainly not been carried out to any thorough standards as well as to any extent that conclusive remarks might be definitively produced regarding the magnitude to which fracking is or is not safe.
These queries are not separated to The state of texas, either. In Pennsylvania, the same case provides arisen inside the town of Dimock, where “people’s drinking water started turning brown and making them sick, one female’s water very well spontaneously combusted, and horse and domestic pets mysteriously began to lose their very own hair” (Bateman). Indeed, all Dimock’s described symptoms point out water very well contamination – contamination that has coincided with the process of hydraulic fracking – “injecting millions of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals, quite a few toxic, into the earth in high challenges to break up rock composition and release gas stuck inside” (Bateman). These mystical coincidences is probably not enough to alarm the most adamant proponents of natural gas energy near your vicinity, but those people who are open to alternative energy alternatives (that will not require drilling for essential oil or gas or hydraulic fracking for the latter) could easily ask why green energy solutions are certainly not being receive claims from energy businesses with the same resolve, dedication and full-throttle spirit clearly demonstrated by simply fracking proponents’ resolutions to secrete gas trapped in rock kilometers deep. For example, the electric power car is merely one example showing how technology could possibly be utilized in the vitality sector to aid transform the fact that industry approaches the demand to get clean strength now being heard from consumers in higher and better numbers. Proof of this demand is almost everywhere – coming from stakeholders in Tesla (TSLA), one of the most popular companies in the stock market to popular videos like Gasland (2010), which in turn give tone to the growing angst in the American buyer.
Josh Sibel, director of Gasland (2010), points out which the 2005 Strength Bill fixed into law by George Bush, removed away quite a few environmental restrictions allowing strength companies like Chesapeake to use the technology of hydraulic fracing developed by Halliburton to engage within a large-scale hydraulic fracking operation protecting 34 states in the U. S. Fox shows that the legislation that had been in effect prior to 2005 (legislation that got come into being because of support by organizations like the EPA) was now – as a result of the Bush-era strength bill – no longer in force – and energy companies engaged in strength production were no longer restricted by polices and suggestions designed to protect people plus the environment all together. What this means is that the protection precautions that were followed by energy companies for many years literally went out the window so that hydraulic fracking could be pursued with better ease. Surely it must be recognized as another dubious coincidence (like water turning brown in areas where hydraulic fracking is conducted) that main fracking procedures would instantly start booming across the U. S. as soon as energy restrictions are significantly lightened.
Such suspicions will be ignored simply by fracking advocates, however – especially simply by those who participate in fallacious reasoning in order to diminish the real issues of true
Americans. The arguments of Seamus McGraw, for instance, are gentle defenses of hydraulic fracking. In his document, McGraw symbolizes himself is getting to the truth of the trouble by dissecting “the top ten controversial claims” about the task – beginning with the idea that the U. S. is “the Saudi Arabia of natural gas” as David Kerry once observed in 2010 (McGraw 350). However , what McGraw is actually doing is setting up strawmen arguments in order to topple them down and make fracking look less relating to than it actually is. For example , McGraw notes the U. S i9000. has nowhere fast near the energy fields that Saudi Arabia features (the natural gas reserves in the U. T.
