Excerpt from Term Paper:
medicalmarijuanaprocon. org/bin/procon/procon. cgi? database=5-B-Subs-1. dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414. 848519162785). ” Mar 1, 3 years ago Lester Grinspoon
One of the more debatable uses of marijuana is the fact that that it is thought to alleviate irritation which opens the doors for arguments with regards to disorders which include fibromyalgia which usually doctors still debate the presence of. However , as long as the patient can be suffering and will match the set conditions for the disorder, that is society to dispute that it does not exist and it should not really be cured?
Medical weed has less abuse and damaging potential than some of the current medicines being recommended to overcome such health problems and disorders. The legalization and use of medical cannabis will provide the capacity for doctors and individuals to choose which usually treatment option can reduce symptoms with the least amount of damaging aspect affects that can be caused by such treatments.
Almost all physicians selected support the used of medical cannabis with the pursuing conditions and recommendations (PRO (YES) (http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785).
A failure of most approved medicines to provide pain relief has been recorded, the symptoms can moderately be expected being relieved simply by rapid-onset cannabinoid drugs, this sort of treatment is usually administered below medical oversight in a manner that permits assessment of treatment performance, and entails an oversight strategy corresponding to an institutional review panel process that may provide direction within 24 hours of a distribution by a medical professional to provide cannabis to a sufferer for a specific use (PRO (YES) (http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785).”
The benefit of legalizing medical pot use beyond the available today THC tablet includes the very fact that studies have shown the rapid onset of its delivery when used to smoke is more beneficial to the patient than the usual pill that needs to be digested and distributed through the entire body.
Till a non-smoked rapid-onset cannabinoid drug delivery system becomes available, we recognize that there is not any clear alternate for people experiencing chronic conditions that might be treated by cigarette smoking marijuana, such as pain or AIDS losing in those patients that have not responded to standard accepted therapy (PRO (YES) (http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785).”
The manager of the New England Log of Medicine, Dr . Jerome Kassirer, wrote in 1997 his belief that prohibiting doctors from certifying patients to work with marijuana to get medical conditions actually prohibits the doctors from upholding all their medical promises to treat and do not any harm.
I really believe that a government policy that prohibits doctors from treating suffering by prescribing pot for really ill patients is misdirected, heavy-handed, and inhumane. Pot may have long-term negative effects and its make use of may presage serious habits, but neither long-term unwanted effects nor addiction is a relevant issue in this sort of patients (PRO (YES) (http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785).”
It is hypocritical for the us government to provide a means for doctors to prescribe morphine and methadone and other incredibly addicting and potent medications while neglecting doctors to be able to suggest that an individual smoke marijuana to relieve symptoms.
The pros of medical pot use include the rapid delivery, the written about relief of psychical symptoms through it is use, the truth that it is less hazardous than many medications currently being prescribed for all those symptoms and the ability of marijuana to create appetite although reducing nausea for chemo and AIDS patients (PRO (YES) (http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785).
Arguments Resistant to the Bill
The arguments against the bill include several factors.
The most visible argument against the use of marijuana for medical purposes may be the belief that THC supplements can produce most of the same benefits and impacts without the mental impairment (Flynn, 2000).
Moreover the bill to legalize cannabis use does not include the ability to sell off or buy it legitimately. This will essentially place sufferers who already are vulnerable in further risk by having them go into the road to locate and buy their source from medicine dealers who have may not be recognized for their morals or credibility (Flynn, 2000).
Study shows that smoking marijuana can be addictive and has different damaging well being effects upon users, just like pneumonia, cancers, and lower birth dumbbells. The effects of smoking marijuana might be worse than those of cigarette smoking tobacco. You cannot find any requirement for a prescription, simply no quality control or screening standards, and no control over durability, dosage, or frequency useful, such as those for prescription drugs. Patients do not control over the dosage received through smoked marijuana because potency can differ from grow to grow (Flynn, 2000). “
U. S. Senator Bill Frist, M. D. argues resistant to the belief that it must be the most effective drug available for “Although I understand effortless marijuana is among the most effective medicine in dealing with their medical ailments, I would caution from this assumption because of the lack of constant, repeatable technological data open to prove marijuana’s medical benefits (CON (NO) (http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785).”
There are also arguments that weed serves as a gateway medicine to front the way for further serious and addictive drug use in the near future.
Those who are against medical weed use believe it paves the path to later use of stronger unlawful drugs which further makes issues of addiction.
Personal Views in the Writer
It’s the opinion of the writer that medical pot use should be legal for those who have documented disorders or health problems in which the make use of marijuana can easily alleviate symptoms. It is my opinion that it should be treated in the same manner as prescription pain pills for the reason that recreational use, over work with and use for pleasure should be illegitimate (it needs to be legal (http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-I-Subs-2.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=4rnd=842.3596748213727).
In the same way that opiates are prescribed pertaining to pain almost always there is the chance pertaining to abuse or perhaps for it being sold on the street and used by those who have no medical need for this, however , the use of medical weed for noted and measurable conditions really should not be opposed based on the fact that it can be mistreated. If this kind of were a valid argument then your government must remove almost all opiate discomfort pills from use too.
Doctors are able to prescribe drugs for these symptoms plus the drugs approved are more dangerous, more addictive and more damaging than pot. The use of medical marijuana to get chronic discomfort may actually decrease the number or perhaps opiate addicts that America currently provides.
For those with life threatening and life altering circumstances the menace of dependence on medical cannabis is small compared to the quality of life that this kind of use would give back to all of them.
References
Kreit, Alex (2003) the future of medical marijuana: should the states expand their own?
Dahl, Dick (2006) Medical weed laws increase in smoke cigars
Lawyers UNITED STATES
Flynn, Kevin (2000) POT for MEDICAL USE OFFERS STRONG SUPPORT in POLLS Colorado Rocky Pile News
QUE CONTIENE (NO) (accessed 7-20-07)
http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785
PRO (YES) (accessed 7-20-07)
http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-B-Subs-1.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=1rnd=414.848519162785
It must be legal (accessed 7-20-07)
http://www.medicalmarijuanaprocon.org/bin/procon/procon.cgi?database=5-I-Subs-2.dbcommand=viewoneop=tid=4rnd=842.3596748213727
