1) Analyze Aquarius in terms of the five in-text variables: * Goals: Aquarius has understood a huge injury in regards towards the rapid turnover of their major accounts. An agency reorganization is a realistic goal in changing their competitive techniques. This reorganization could possibly set all of them apart from the various other agencies by simply reducing their response some increasing the communication between your different departments to boost effectiveness. * Tradition: In my opinion I believe that Aquarius has a very low and undefined organizational tradition.
It seems like employees are all taking care of themselves and trying to succeed of everyone otherwise. These beliefs although unwritten provide the stuff to having everybody on the same site and are necessary in providing clients with top of the line job. * Size: Since Aquarius is a mid-sized firm with assorted specialists on the professional personnel of the businesses and marketing divisions I would say they have anywhere from 1000-1500 employees. With this many employees it is critical to have successful communication between your different departments.
This may in turn increase flexibility from this unpredictable environment.
* Environment: Changes in the environment is the main reason why the company is thinking about the need for reorganization. It is standard for advertising firms to gain/lose clients quickly, this is why would it be so essential to have everybody in the business effectively conntacting each other to be able to satisfy all their clients and reduce turnover. 5. Technology: Aquarius has a a few different specialists prove team basically together in assisting their particular clients, but there is always room for improvement in regards to better communication. It appears to me that Aquarius may have a number of different courses and web sites to assist all of them achieving their particular services.
2) A new company structure that takes into mind the contextual variables in case and the info flows is the divisional framework. This structure is suited to fast change in an unstable environment and offers high product or service visibility. A problem that occurs in Aquarius is the fact each customer account is coordinated by simply an account exec who provides a liaison between the client and various specialists. Unfortunately this may not followed since sometimes the account business owners don’t even know what is certainly going on until a week later.
The divisional structure leads to customer satisfaction since product responsibility and contacts are obvious. This in turn involves high dexterity across features which will make everybody check with the executive 1st to get approval before contacting the client. Coordination across functions will permit their companies to adjust to the requirements of the individual clients and perform beyond their expectations. This structure would allow Aquarius to achieve their goals although increasing their organizational lifestyle as a whole and being able to modify more quickly to the unstable environment.
3) Might a matrix structure end up being feasible for Aquarius? I my opinion I believe which a balanced matrix structure would be hard to put into practice and maintain. The main reason for this is the fact that accounts executives jointly side of the authority framework would generally dominate above the specialists. To ensure that the bank account executive to perform their job correctly they want everyone issues side and in coordination to operate important information by them 1st.
Perhaps a much better alternative is a product matrix where the executives have major authority plus the specialists give technical personal to the projects and provide exhortatory expertise while needed. With dual specialist I feel that it could be frustrating and confusing for everyone, there must be a clear contact points. There could always be a purpose for frequent meetings to fix any disputes between the several authorities, it would simply just need to superb of an efforts to maintain the strength balance.