string(61) ‘ hide your research question within the purpose of the study\. ‘
Essay preview The purpose of this assignment is to critique and evaluate the chosen content in terms of abilities and failings, to demonstrate a comprehension of the study process. In respect to Polit and Beck (2004) the purpose of critically working with an article is usually an attempt to ascertain its strengths and limitations. Therefore , the research critique should reflect an objective and well balanced consideration in the study’s quality and relevance (Polit and Hungler 1999).
The task of critiquing can be, according to Lo Biondo-Wood and Harber (2006) a challenging a single and can only become effectively obtained through very much practice and skill.
For the purpose of this critique, the frames of Parahoo (1997) and Polit and Hungler (1999) have been applied as a guide. This will help in producing a great organised sub-headed piece of work. Title The title of an article is definitely the first a part of a study to become encountered and Parahoo (1997) states that the title should certainly draw the reader’s focus on the precise part of study and make reference to the population from which the data is usually collected. Cormack (2000) and Marshall and Kelly (2007) agree, saying a subject should be exact and reveal the content of the study.
The chosen content is entitled , Recognized barriers and facilitators to implementing analysis findings in the Irish practice setting’. This title used by Glacken and Chaney is exact, consisting of 13 words in bold print out. Rumrill et al (2000) state that a typical length subject is doze , 12-15 words. However , the title will not reflect the population of the test group i. e. Authorized Nurses. Although the title nonetheless provides regarding what the article is trying to accomplish. Author(s) Relating to Cormack (2000) analysts must be competent to commence a esearch study. The researchers degree and qualifications in the article are plainly stated and simple to find. That they both have inventeur after all their names, among which has a PHD, which indicate that they have an educational background. A search using Glacken and Chaney making use of the ProQuest repository identifies several published articles by Glacken. According to Lo Biondo-Wood and Harber (2002) this enhances the trustworthiness of a analyze placing self confidence in the conclusions. The article was submitted to get publication on the 1st July 2003 and was accepted on the ninth January 2004.
This displays that it was still relevantly recent and not old when printed which could possess posed queries regarding validity and trustworthiness. “The Journal of Specialized medical Nursing” features published this article. This also adds to the believability of the study, as most published content articles are dual bind peer reviewed. Fuzy The purpose of the abstract is to supply a short extensive synopsis of an article (Rumrill et ‘s 2000). Relating to Parahoo (1997) it may quickly emphasis the reader’s attention on the main points with the study.
Langford (2001) likewise states a well-presented subjective should be appropriate, self-contained and readable. This kind of abstract provides a brief brief summary of the study and inside the first few lines identifies the actual study is attempting to achieve , to ascertain what registered nursing staff perceive because barriers for the utilisation of research findings and discover the actual perceive might facilitate the implementation of these findings. The rest of the fuzy provides a synopsis of strategy (cross-sectional survey), the population (registered nurses) and overall findings.
One restriction noted would be that the researchers do not give the exact sample size in the subjective. By looking over this summary it truly is believed that the reader would be able to make an educated choice regarding the significance of the document for their purpose. The keywords used within the abstract had been , barriers, clinical practice, facilitators, Republic of Ireland, utilization. It is vital that researchers choose appropriate keywords for their content in order to help literature searching through directories (Webb 2005).
The keywords used by Glacken and Chaney are all highly relevant to the research study. Introduction The goal of the introductory section should be to clearly identify the problem and provide a explanation for the analysis been carried out (Cormack 2000). Poilt and Hungler (1999) agree by simply stating the fact that introduction should certainly explain your research problem and why the research is important, beneficial and relevant. Russell (2004) also claims that the launch should carefully describe the setting of the research problem in order that the need for the analysis is noticeable.
The launch given by Glacken and Chaney builds a reason from existing literature that the problem is of adequate benefit to justify further analysis. The author on this critique feels the research is actually in the last sentence of the intro. It declares that there are many difficulties associated with achieving facts , structured practice and lots of barriers that may impede research utilisation. If this sounds in fact your research problem, the researchers abide by Russell’s (2004) recommendation the research difficulty should circulation directly from the introduction and conclude this section.
However one would feel that this introduction offers more with all the importance of exploration rather than describing that the remainder of the content will give attention to the barriers that obstruct research. Relating to Cormack (2000) an intro should also state the study’s limitations. This kind of introduction does not make the study’s limitations explicit to the visitor. Literature Review/Background According to Parahoo (1997) a materials review provides to put the latest study into the context of what is previously known about the subject.
Cormack (2000) claims that the literary works review is known as a critical review of previous literature relating to the study topic. Consequently this section aims to provide the target audience with an understanding of the particular current express of facts is in the chosen area of study. This review is prepared by heading that correspond to the key examine concepts, that makes the review easy to follow. The researchers make an effort to review previous studies relating to the topic, as a result preparing the floor for new study. The studies presented highlight the significance in the problem beneath investigation.
It had been difficult to recognize the exact study question, as there was simply no definite question asked. Though Valente (2003) states that sometimes research workers may conceal the research query within the purpose of the study.
From examining the reference list, it can be viewed that this is definitely the case in support of three sources before year 1994 have been employed. There was a purpose for these more mature references as the original author who employed the Barriers range did so 20 years ago and the aim of the 78 reference was to illustrate that access to research information has been a difficulty for many years. As well noted is usually that the articles included in the reference list are clearly related to the topic below study and can include international methods, all medical , related. http://repository. uwc. ac. a/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10566/308/RoweBlendedLearning2012. pdf? sequence=3 Method In respect to Polit and Hungler (1999) the heart with the research analyze is the examination of the methodology decisions used in addressing the research question. Cormack (2000) suggests the strategy section should clearly condition the research method of be used and asks perhaps the method is appropriate to the research problem and whether the strong points and constraints of the procedure are stated. Although not written in text message it is evidently pointed out that this article is of a quantitative strategy.
Burns and Groves (1997) describe quantitative research like a method utilized to gain more information, test human relationships and uses numeric info to answer problems. In reviewing the strategy section which is under the subheading “Methods”, the researchers obviously demonstrate the fact that design technique is a mix , sectional survey by using a non , probability sample. According to Polit and Hungler (1999) a combination , sectional design entails the collection of data at 1 point in time. This kind of descriptive examine uses the established 29 , item Barriers a few point Likert scale, after firstly getting permission from the main author to employ the instrument , S.
Funk. Therefore a strength of this article is related to the measurement tool. The research workers used a great already developed measurement gadget in which the reliability of the instrument would have recently been determined. That they reinforce this fact simply by saying that the size is recognised to be psychometrically robust. Another quantitative research tool , a customer survey, was chosen as the process to solicit opinions regarding the barriers to research. Cormack (2000) believes that questionnaires would be the most widely used technique of collecting info.
However he recognises that if members are aware that they are partaking within a study, it can be natural that they can might adjust their response , the Hawthorne Result (Cormack 2000). The researchers do not express how they reduced this Hawthorne Effect. As well as the questionnaire, a demographic info sheet was utilised. This can be in line with a descriptive design and style, as the goal of such is usually to gain more information about you will of a group (Vitale 2003). The research participants were a convenience test of registered nurses whom enrolled in a nursing centered academic course in Trinity College, Dublin.
All whom enrolled were invited to participate in the analysis. However the recruiting process can be not defined in very much detail. It is not necessarily until the Findings section the fact that size of the sample is revealed , 169 participants responded. In accordance to Thompson (1999) the sample size in quantitative research is preferably a large sample. Vitale (2003) states which the general secret regarding sample size is , sample error decreases as sample size increases’. It can be harder to generalise an example of this size. It is accepted by the researchers in the Dialogue section the particular method of testing employed may well introduce opinion into the studies.
This may result in the findings turning into less dependable. A limit noted inside the method design and style used by the researchers was the lack of a great explicit structure. The researchers did not discover if that they used one particular. When researching the other research that utilized the Barriers scale a good many used a framework. Ethical Consideration Values is an important component to nursing and nursing research. It is regarding researchers performing what is fair, decent and moral and is underpinned by simply values and believes from the community (Crookes and Davies 2004).
There is not any designated section allocated to ethical considerations, on the other hand Hek (1996) states that ethical issues may be bundled throughout the content. This article address ethical concerns in both the abstract and under the technique section. The researchers make clear that the moral issues of a persons right not to become harmed, correct of complete disclosure, correct of self-determination, right of privacy and confidentiality had been respected. In line with the researcher every participants provided their agreement to the study by the coming back again of the completed questionnaire.
Consent is vital as it respects the autonomy of individuals, their right to privacy and their right to select (Tingle and Cribb 2002). Results Cormack (2000) declares that the outcomes should be provided clearly and in enough detail so that the target audience is able to assess how dependable the results are. Polit and Beck (2004) acknowledge by stating that the most critical element of any study achievement your effects across and understood because of your readers. Valente (2003) is convinced that the analysts should do it again the research query before delving into the conclusions.
The research workers in this case provided the data in succinct contact form with tiny discussion at the beginning, but set up their conclusions under subheadings. According to Russell (2004) researchers frequently organise their particular findings simply by research issue to assist in readability. The goal was to assess the boundaries to research execution. The creators of this article present their findings systematically, making use of a variety of charts and furniture. Figure 1 shows a graph describing that 38% of the members consulted magazines more than 2 times a month.
Table 1 presents the obstacles to research utilisation in descending order of importance. Results were also explained and summarised alongside which in respect to Clifford (1997) is a type of detailed statistics. In respect to Russell (2004) when a descriptive design was used you should find descriptive figures such as mean, mode, typical and standard deviation. These statistics will be included within the results section. The target audience (professional nurses) are more than likely to be in a position to interpret the figures inside each table and, therefore, judge hoe reliable the results are.
It is important that results are presented in such a way that they can be clearly comprehended (Cormack 2000). Parahoo (1997) is an advocate of comparing benefits with other related studies. The researchers implemented this design and in comparison the top 15 barriers with those seen in three recent studies (Table 3). The researchers confirmed their results to be much the same with the studies undertaken in both Northern Ireland and Australia. Discussion/Conclusion The discussion section should stream from the info results and place the study’s findings in context with what is already known (Parahoo 1997).
Esperto (2003) feels that beneath this section the researchers will need to summarise all their major findings and consider their app to practice, study, and theory and knowledge development. The researchers claim that this section is going to discuss the findings when compared with other research undertaken. Esperto (2003) says that author(s) should compare and contrast their effects with other studies and translate the results. The discussion can be unambiguous and supported by the results acquired. Again the researchers employed subheadings to ease readability. There are plenty of implications to practice identified by the researchers.
In accordance to Capace (2003) effects should illustrate how the results of the study could be applied to nursing practice. For example the experts discovered that their study and many more studies discovered nurses’ recognized lack of authority as the most common barrier to analyze. Therefore they will exposed a purpose to implement some turn into the efficiency setting. As well, more support from managers was mentioned to be the top ranked facilitator of exploration implementation. The researchers as well suggest an extra research study, which will would explore the reasons why nurses do not gain access to research periodicals on a regular basis. Basic Impression
Overall the article was interesting with clear aspires and make use of methodology. It had been quite simple to interpret and has offered interesting simple fact regarding this kind of topic. The study contains couple of flaws and represents a valid example of descriptive quantitative research. The results include addressed the aims in the study and they are both educational and detailed. It is recommended that it may contain a area of ethical consideration however the honest issues are evident throughout the article. In the introduction the content stresses the importance of study in breastfeeding and health care. This develops a good advantages of continuing the analysis.
Research is a vital part of every single nurse’s position. But as this kind of study unveiled there are many limitations for healthcare professionals to defeat to properly use and apply research. This kind of study has brought these obstacles to the downroad and recognized ways to overcome them. The findings were interesting, although it might are more reliable if the study was replicated by using a larger, unique sample group. The top positioned barrier to analyze utilisation was surprising to read, as it was produced known to be nurses’ perceived lack of authority. The article was incredibly good total and a lot of interesting facts emerged from the research. References
