Recently, Individual Visit System (IVS) has turned into a controversial topic in Hong Kong. Online discussion boards, newspapers and magazines happen to be weighing the advantages and negatives of the scheme every day. Unquestionably, it boosts the Hong Kong travel and leisure.
However , it includes led to many drawbacks to Hong Kong in resource allowance, culture difference and sustenance. To start with, pertaining to resource portion, IVS tremendously makes the distribution of methods in Hong Kong become chaotic.
After the implementation of IVS, more and more Landmass visitors head to Hong Kong and cause disorder of solutions in medical services, local products and housing prices. In respect to delivery statistics of non-local women that are pregnant from Hong Kong Hospital Specialist, the number of non-eligible persons publicly stated via Accident and Crisis Department increases from 796 in 2010 to 888 in 2012 January to September, this means the work load of front-line medical consultants is raising.
Since the way to obtain medical consultants has been in shortage already, the medical companies in Hong Kong are not enough and in severe burden to afford. In addition , various local newspaper publishers like Mingpao and Appledaily report that the number of Landmass tourists dedicate lots of money purchasing daily items during their visit. For example , in Sheung Shui, Mainland parallel traders utilize IVS and “One Issuance Multiple Items Visa to buy tins of milk dust, tissues and wines, which usually led to the deficiency of daily supplies in North District.
In other words, people in North District are unable to enjoy the make use of local items as the resource allowance is not enough. Aside from local products, resource allotment of housing is likewise troublesome. Based upon a study conducted by Hong Kong Research Relationship, it shows that with 1080 interviewees, 84 % of them think that through IVS, Mainland persons in Hk have raised the cost of building. It explains that structures built simply by either the Government or house development firms cannot relieve the real estate problem to get local citizens, which, however , benefits people from Mainland.
This demonstrates that the resources are generally not used by the neighborhood, but by simply Mainlanders which includes tourists in IVS. Second, implementing IVS increases disputes between Hongkongers and Mainlanders due to social difference. For instance , Mainland parents allow their children to foul everywhere. Netizens in many Net forums just like hkgolden mentioned such happenings. They mentioned this patterns critically and caused conflicts between persons in Hk and Mainland due to distinct cultural amounts.
Besides, in April, to attract Mainland visitors and become even more customer-friendly, agnes b. in Tseung Kwan O, whose news was reported by SCMP, used made easier Chinese words instead of traditional words in its menus. Treating that because an breach of Hong Kong culture, Hong Kong citizens had been furious of seeing the simplified Chinese words showing up in Hong Kong and tried to boycott that. Moreover, in January, SCMP reported that there was a rally above , image ban’ regarding retailer Dolciume , Divisa, which was a runner rights and cultural unfairness between Mainlanders and Hong Kong people.
These incidents have further made worse the relationship between Mainland visitors through IVS and local people because of social differentiation. In addition to consequences brought on by culture big difference, IVS makes various living problems to local residents which make disruption to their living. Some politicians may think that IVS can easily improve the Hk economy thus increase the living standards of local residents, especially the underprivileged. It is, yet , a wrong conjecture. Scholar Francis T.
Lo (2009) accounts for this assertion: Hong Kong ought to pay for the result of IVS. For instance , the Western european and American brands, milk powder and other products aren’t made in Hong Kong, so that Hk can be assigned limited income. For the Mainland guests going shopping in Hong Kong, it also increases rental prices and prices of goods, which deteriorates the living standards of the local people. Furthermore, the owner of “Subculture Pang Chihuahua Ming gives his opinion about the consequences that IVS has brought: The eating ability of Mainland guests makes Hk lose her local design.
For example , outlets in Mongkok are entertained by pharmacies, jewelry retailers, electronics shops and cosmetic makeup products shops which will welcome Mainland tourists. Playing also makes local individuals lose a place for recreational make use of. Increased offences also lower the lifestyle in Hong Kong. According to the Hong Kong Law enforcement crime figures of A comparison of 2012 and 2011 Offense Situation, from January to October in 2012, the total range of crimes determined by Landmass visitors increases 9. 7% compared with a similar period in 2011.
In the past, such criminals were mostly against the law immigrants, nevertheless they do not have risks to visit Hong Kong illegally. They can head to Hong Kong simply by IVS, then simply commit criminal activity and trigger troubles to the living. Such results and shocking statistics have deprived Hongkongers in the way of life. To conclude, IVS triggers different disadvantages to Hong Kong in allocating resources, social relationship with China plus the living specifications. It is wished that the Hong Kong Government will need to and must pay attention to and deal with these potential worries for the sake of the plight of residents.
