TAKE-HOME ESSAY #2 Psy 2300, Fall 2012 •The second take-home dissertation will be worth 20 items. You may employ your textbook, D2L resources, and course notes. You possibly will not collaborate with fellow pupils! •Essays should be double-spaced, with 1-inch margins and an acceptable font size (e.
g., 12 point). •PLEASE CAREFULLY PROOFREAD YOUR ANSWERS INTENDED FOR CLARITY , TYPOS, increased proofreading errors will result in a deduction of points, since will a failure to follow the formatting requirements above! •The essay should be 1-3 webpages long and arranged into coherent paragraphs. You should organize the essay based on the subdivisions supplied (a, n, c, etc . ). You don’tneed to use a formal essay formatting (introduction, human body, conclusion). •Please use the own words and phrases whenever possible. If you believe you must estimate from class notes or perhaps the textbook, refer to the source effectively. •You may well answer any of the three queries provided. If you answer multiple, only the first one will be rated. •Essays will be DUE in the Dropbox simply by 9: 59 p. meters. on Fri, November ninth. 1 . Compare and contrast the Big Five with POSSIBLY Eysenck’s style OR Tellegen’s model (i.., identify similarities and differences). If you choose Tellegen, focus on the three higher-order characteristics, just label the primary weighing scales as examples if relevant. Think about how a models were derived and also the meaning from the traits themselves. Then discuss which in turn of the three trait types covered in the lecture you prefer and whether you imagine any important aspects of personality are overlooked of the 3 models. Be sure to JUSTIFY selecting a favorite unit by offering at least two specific reasons. installment payments on your
Consider what it means to be high in the characteristics of Extraversion and Neuroticism (separately). Then make links between every single trait and current concern theory. Specifically, address just how being rich in these qualities might effect: •Which types of goals people follow •How their particular goal things to do affect them (emotionally and cognitively) •How they progress through the incentive-disengagement cycle every time a goal is usually blocked What I’m looking for here is a considerate discussion of just how being loaded with E and being high in N may possibly affect someones motivational processes, using concepts from Klinger’s current matter theory.
It could help to refer to the low ends of these attributes to provide a compare with the substantial ends (e. g., “unlike introverts, once extraverts follow a goal, “). a few. If you’d like to be a bit creative, inform a “story” about a person with a particular configuration of traits. Particularly, choose IN LEAST 3 of the Big Five OR Tellegen’s main traits (if you choose Tellegen, make sure to find out trait via each higher-order factor). The person can be purely hypothetical or perhaps based on someone you know, I also had students discuss the fictional characters Dwight (from “The Office”) and Borat!
Describe just how that person typically behaves for the way they credit score on the three traits you ultimately choose. For example , “Ralph” might be large C, low N, and medium To. What may well Ralph’s patterns patterns end up like? His sociable relationships? His goal things to do? Would his trait setup lead to any kind of particular concerns in his your life? What I am just looking for is a clear understanding of the characteristics you choose and the ability to APPLY those traits to a practical scenario where the traits can easily interact with the other person. Have fun! [NOTE: Excellent sample full-credit essay posted on D2L to assist with this choice! ]
