PH220 — Ethics and Principles Morgan Express University Doctor John Hersey Midterm Exam Directions: Your exams should be submitted through SafeAssign in Blackboard. Later submissions will be penalized 10 points (one full letter grade) and I will not accept distribution after seven days past the deadline, which will result in a 0 for the task.
Plagiarism merits automatic inability for the course. Put your name, PHIL CANNELLA 220 with section number, Dr . Hersey, semester and year, Midterm Examination on top left from the first webpage. Clearly determine section titles, item quantities, and descriptions.
Remember the rubric to get evaluation of written job from the syllabus. Any recommendations to the text message should be mentioned simply by the page amount in parentheses. Section 1: Explanations Write a 4-5 word explanation pertaining to 5 in the following. (20 points) It is crucial to be while thorough, exact, and essential as possible inside the short space allotted. Full credit will probably be given for explanations that not only recognize the concept, although also reveal its context and ethical significance. 1 ) Psychological egoism (Ch. 2) 2 . Widespread ethical egoism (Ch. 2) 3. Finest happiness principle (Ch. 2) 4.
Cost-benefit analysis (Ch. 2) your five. Care values (Ch. 2) 6. Intuitionism (Ch. 3) 7. Divine Command Theory (Ch. 3) 8. Good will (Kant, Ch. 3) 9. Sensible imperative (Kant, Ch. 3) 10. Prima facie obligations (Ross, Ch. 3) 14. Virtue values (Ch. 4) 12. Joy (Aristotle, Ch. 4) 13. Habit (Aristotle, Ch. 4) 14. Advantage as a mean (Aristotle, Ch. 4) 12-15. Excellence, para (Confucius, Ch. 4) sixteen. Mengzi upon human nature (Confucius, Ch. 4) 17. Meaningful absolutism (Ch. 5 and Rachels essay) 18. Ethnical relativism (Ch. 5 and Rachels essay) 19. Fatalism (Ch. 6) 20. Hard determinism (Ch. 6) twenty one. Soft determinism (Ch. 6) 22.
The importance of Life Theory (Ch. 8) 23. The Principle of Individual Flexibility (Ch. 8) Section 2: Essays Create a response in answer to two of the essay questions listed below. (40 factors each) Though quality of consideration takes precedence above quantity of webpages, 2–3 double-spaced pages for each essay seems to be a good guide for length. 1 . In Ursula E. Le Guin’s short history “The Kinds Who Walk Away from Omelas, ” Omelas is a utopian associated with happiness and delight in whose inhabitants will be intelligent and cultured. Anything about the city is attractive except for the secret underlying Omelas’s happiness.
Omelas’s good fortune requires that a one child is imprisoned and kept in filth, night, and agony. Upon coming of age all the citizens of Omelas happen to be informed from the city’s dark secret. After learning this kind of secret many citizens continue in the city however, many walk away. Many take this short story as a sharp critique of functional moral beliefs. Evaluate this kind of critique by simply (1) figuring out the argument implied inside the story, (2) developing a very careful and complete presentation of the relevant aspects of Mill’s philosophy upon which you might basic your evaluation, and (3) arguing intended for the failure or success of this argument.
You may find a duplicate of the brief story in Blackboard. 2 . Consider the next scenario. Following colliding with an iceberg at marine the luxury lining RMS. Huge sinks inside the North Atlantic. Four survivors—two adult males, a single adult girl, all with families safe at home, and a 10-year old boy, who is weak from accidental injuries suffered throughout the sinking and whose whole family has recently perished in the disaster—are uncertain on a lifeboat with hardly one week’s provisions for every them.
Around the seventeenth time adrift, with the survivors desperate for food, someone suggests that since the boy will most likely die anyway and does not have a family to manage that the three adults will need to kill him and employ his body system for nourishment until they can be rescued. In a detailed and thoughtful article, write hope for00 the question “Is it permissible to destroy the young man? ” through the perspectives of Immanuel Margen (Duty Ethics) and David Stuart Work (Utilitarianism). Your essay should include a careful and comprehensive consideration of the relevant areas of their meaning theories pertaining to addressing the question.
Finally, give you a own personal meaning evaluation with the question and the supporting causes of your look at. 3. Consider the following situation. Three MSU students, Pleasure, Faith, and Hope, work on a soup kitchen just about every Saturday supporting the desolate. Joy devotes every Saturday helping the homeless since she loves and loves doing it. During your stay on island is certainly a few personal sacrifice in doing so , she loves you so deeply for others and sympathizes together with the homeless someones plight a whole lot that she willingly and consistently serves. Faith also helps every Weekend, but very rarely enjoys that.
Some Saturdays she should go begrudgingly and more she need to force their self to go. Yet she will go regularly because the girl recognizes that there is a common demand to do good in front of large audiences that can not be ignored. Desire is on the fast track into a career in politics and will be running for public workplace immediately after graduation. She also allows out every Saturday, nevertheless works hard only when the neighborhood news companies come about for selection interviews. In a cautious and complete essay evaluate each of these person’s actions through the perspective of Kant’s ethical philosophy.
Which will of these person’s actions has moral worth for Kant? Why? For what reason do some not have moral really worth? Are there any problems with such appraisal? Do you concur or differ with Kant’s evaluation with their actions? Clarify in detail so why or perhaps you should and warrant your view? 4. Consider the following verse from Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment: “Look here, on one side we have a stupid, senseless, worthless, spiteful, suffering, horrid aged woman, not merely useless, nevertheless doing genuine mischief, who has not an thought what she is living pertaining to herself, and who will pass away in a day or two in any case… On the other hand, fresh fresh lives thrown away for want of help, through thousands, on every side! Hundreds of thousand very good deeds could possibly be done and helped, in that old female’s money which will be buried in a monastery! Hundreds, thousands probably, might be dress the right path, dozens of families salvaged from destitution, from ruin, from vice, from the Fasten hospitals—and most with her money. Get rid of her, take those money and with the help of this devote your self to the assistance of humanity and the very good of all.
So what do you think, may not one small crime become wiped out by thousands of great deeds? For one life thousands would be saved from problem and rot. One fatality, and a hundred lives in exchange—it’s simple arithmetic! ” (Part I, Chapter 6). Clarify the debate given in this kind of passage. Can it be a good act utilitarian disagreement (assuming the reality to be around as stated)? How would a secret utilitarian and a Kantian criticize in this way of act utilitarian thinking? Which of those two sorts of criticism (if any) do you find even more convincing? Clarify your thinking in detail. your five.
To what degree do you think that Jews, Christian believers, and Muslims use the Work Command Theory approach instead of egoism or perhaps act or rule utilitarianism as a basis for their moral systems? That is certainly, do you believe most Jews, Christians, and Muslims adhere to their religion’s moral rules because they believe that those guidelines were structured on a supernatural being or perhaps for other reasons, for example intended for the assurance of incentive in the the grave, out of fear of punishment, for solution, etc .? Describe your answer in detail. six. Moral rules can be very helpful for governing existence and leading our actions.
However , challenges can arise in the using such guidelines to uncommon situations. In such cases adherence to rules can lead to actions being performed that would be considered immoral. How does Aristotelian Virtue Values, with its emphasis on the development of a virtuous persona, address the condition of moral rules? Be thorough and very specific in your consideration. To what level do you think the condition of moral rules plays a role in modern day morality? 7. Write a discussion between two people who supporter different positions on the concern of moral debt slavery and ethical relativism.
Become thorough, considerate, and reflective. Style, laughter, creativity, and cleverness in the examples are typical welcomed, nevertheless make sure that the dialogue makes clear that you just understand the key concepts concerning relativism and absolutism. eight. Write a conversation between a couple who endorse different positions on the concern of freedom. Be complete, thoughtful, and reflective. Style, humor, creativeness, and brains in your good examples are all made welcome, but ensure that the conversation makes clear that you be familiar with key principles concerning flexibility and determinism.. Do you think that suicide is morally justified? Drawing on a few of the ethical ideas from our textual content, explain how come you believe that it must be or is not justified. If you think that it is sometimes justified, then identify and explain situations that make it justified. 10. Do you think that capital punishment is usually morally validated? Drawing on a few of the ethical hypotheses from our text message, explain so why you believe that it can be or can be not validated. If you believe that it is occasionally justified, in that case identify and explain situations that make it justified.
