string(30) ‘ the roles of law inside the Web\. ‘
Trip Report Yorgos Amanatidis This is a trip report for the internet Science Seminar 2009 (WebSci’09) that occurred from the eighteenth to the twentieth of 03 2009, in Athens, Greece. Location: The Conference was held at the “Hellenic Cosmos” intricate of the Foundation of the Hellenic World. Hellenic Cosmos was indeed very suitable for such an event.
The location was technologically equipped, the location was readily available for me, equally by the and by car, with satisfactory parking space.
Although I stayed in Piraeus, I could assume that the transportation to/from the Meeting was evenly easy for every one of the participants. Business: Concerning the firm and the advertisements of WebSci’09, I have to admit everything was well planed and the conference was quite publicized. Yet , and this had not been an doubt of myself alone, a lot of the publicity was due to the unusually large number of users of the Ancient greek Parliament that talked through the Conference.
Training courses, Talks, Paper prints: I attended the Web Science Curriculum Workshop and just the first hour of the UIWoSC Workshop due to my fly lag. I understand that the two workshops were planned to obtain only a few individuals, however they were very interesting and illustrative in the struggle to decide the restrictions of an rising scientific region. To say my opinion, I cannot observe web research independent of computer scientific research, and I think the most plausible path is the among information research, as it is called in the U. S.
My spouse and i attended several talks and enjoyed the majority of them, although the topics of several sessions diverged too much via my notion of what net science should/will be, electronic. g. the “Cultural Concurrence and Digital Technology” treatment. I had the opportunity to talk to some individuals about my research and get some interesting ideas upon more utilized directions, I had been a bit disappointed though, that two of the three other loudspeakers in my treatment did not appear. Finally, a couple of thoughts about the Poster Session. I came across many of the cards really interesting and I had the chance to talk to a number of the authors.
It appears to me, that this would be a good idea if the cartel session was obviously a bit more “central” in the system, since on the and of the very first day most people were already tired. Also, it could be nice to have some advice about the posters on the net page from the conference. General, I would declare attending WebSci’09, was a valuable and interesting experience, and I will try to attend WebSci meetings again later on. WebSci’09 Report – Norhidayah Azman While i received the e-mail saying I was among the lucky recipients of the WebSci’09 bursary merit, I could not believe my own eyes.
Firstly, that dawned upon me which i was going to enroll in the first ever conference to become run simply by WSRI. After that secondly, I had been going to head to Athens! The conference happened to run from 18-20 March 2009 in the beautiful Hellenic Naturel of the Foundation of the Hellenic World. As soon as me and my friends established eyes around the venue, we were truly excited. I completely agree with Hie Wendy the moment she stated in her welcoming address that the highly advanced dome was reason enough to arrive there to get the convention. The city center also provided more than enough interruptions for us delegates before and after the conference.
Becoming a first-year PhD student, I had been thrilled being given to the opportunity to mingle between these excellent minds gather in support of a common goal: to witness the future of the Web. We also got the enjoyment of discussing with Bebo White-colored, a dominant personality in the wonderful world of Web exploration. He stated it was such a good reception for a meeting where nobody knows what it’s regarding! Lots of dominant speakers graced the event, delivering interesting keynote speeches that provided a great overview of the breadth and depth of Web Technology.
Sir Harry Berners-Lee, with his affable perform, showcased his revolutionary pondering during the opening WWW Discussion board. He declared 80% with the world’s populace does not have access to the Internet, therefore future technological developments should be inclusive of this huge populace. To help reach out to more persons, he suggested building a water-based wireless router! It’s quite interesting to see the various ways of how several keynote audio speakers envisage the evolution from the Web.
Frederick Sifakis likens its maturity today since similar to physics during the Dark ages, while Nigel Shadbolt symbolized the Web’s issues since an elefant in the room. He also asked: how do you assess the economic value of collective content? Nosh Contractor offered an excellent speech, clearly outlining the ways to identify different generative mechanisms that explain zustande kommend structures seen in large-scale sites. He emphasized that technology does not mean the death of length, because by his experimental results applying EverQuest, individuals within a 50km radius can be 22. times more likely to end up being friends online than compared to a 50-80km radius. The papers and panels presented were eye-opening as well. This is when the width of World wide web Science looked like very obvious. On the same track, you could find some type of computer Science conventional paper followed by a Law daily news which was then simply followed by a Sociology conventional paper. The different strategies and perspectives towards dealing with Web concerns do encourage a lot of dialogue during the Q sessions, that i find extremely refreshing. I actually attended the next tracks: Trust and Doubt, Openness versus Control, Great example of such, and Govt, Citizens, Law and the Net.
Throughout these types of tracks, a few of the interesting issues included reputation, mobile Internet, collaborative blocking, trust propagation, Net neutrality, digital details and Bibles written in Klingon. The best was the legal panel which will discussed level of privacy and info retention problems. It was interesting to see the way the perspectives of law experts and pc scientists collide when it comes to determining the tasks of law in the World wide web.
I am thrilled to be a a part of Web Science’s history, and what better spot to do this within a historical city just like Athens! Synopsis Report for WebSci ’09 Conference Athens, Greece 18th-20th March, 2009 by Bipana Bantawa Petulante Student It had been indeed incredibly exciting to go to my 1st Web Technology conference and I admit that I came back with mixed thoughts about the proceedings with the conference. The initial workshop online science curriculum turned out to be more like a business presentation session and i also really desire there could have been a better way to deal with the unprecendented number of participants.
Although it was mandatory to transmit a position paper to attend the workshop, most of the attendees signed up with at the last second and I believe that we lost a great chance to have an joining debate about the subject. Eventually I would have got agreed with Jim Hendler’s argument the fact that curriculum ought to be such that pupils should be able to make something new and only relevant components from different disciplines should be chosen and for the purpose.
The second workshop on the effects of the world wide web was executed on comparable lines and i also was thirstily looking forward to have a discussion, which ofcourse would not materialise as a result of structure from the room and number of members. I certainly enjoyed the majority of the participant’s views and Steven Harnad’s introduction to the argument could not have been completely more appropriate. Nigel Shadbolt’s key note speech on the second day was certainly promising and encouraging to novices like myself.
His emphasis on philosophy and multidisciplinarity was the emphasize for me of this day. The following paper session on ‘teaching and learning’ began which has a presentation, which will really disappointed me since it gave us a brief introduction to the web sensation in a very succinct, pithy manner with little evidence to back it up. It may be a bit too crucial about it, but on the other hand I was planning on something new and exciting as a strarter. Nevertheless , Carl Lagoze’s presentation on OreChem launched me to new strategies that I have been looking for.
The highlight from the third time and perhaps the complete conference personally was Noshir contractors essential note, that has been perhaps the the majority of engaging messages of the function and it was wonderful to know from an absolute multidisciplinarian and i also am absolutely going to stick to his operate, which I imagine I would not have found so easily or else. The paper session in social networks was your one that was most unforgettable that day time and I quite enjoyed Schindler and Vrandecic’s presentation on wikipedia’s news and Halpin’s philosophical disputes for this strategies.
Overall, I definitely attained a lot coming from attending this conference simply by getting to meet up with academics coming from different exercises and other doctoral college students who had this sort of diverse views that I were required to challenge my very own. I was likewise introduced to new methodologies and theories that i will research in detail over the following couple of months to determine what could make a difference for my personal research. My spouse and i appreciated the diversity of participants and the effort to comprehend each other whilst they came from different academic professions, which I picture is rather than an easy subject.
The opportunity to in brief introduce personally to several teachers whose operate I want to follow and perhaps ask for guidance on different facets on my own idea was genuinely invaluable. It had been my 1st conference as being a doctoral college student and I would want to thank you for providing me the chance to participate. Besides learning even more about the emerging discipline, I feel tremendously encouraged to pursue my research and attend foreseeable future conferences and I am getting excited about the next websci event. Thanks a lot, again. WebSci09 Conference Presence Report Mohamed Bishr m. [email, protected] e The first WebSci conference was a very good chance for myself to attend the birth of a fresh research community. The overall corporation of the meeting was, in fact excellent, and the poster period where I used to be involved was very well been able. I have attained several interesting people in the conference, too I have was able to make useful contacts pertaining to my exploration and job. The seminar as a great interaction platform proved incredibly valuable to me. The papers presented at the conference, while being various, managed to attract my focus for the most part.
Especially papers centering on nontechnical facets of the web since this is an area that is certainly often understudied. The location from the conference was ideal, and allowed me to experience a fresh country and culture, which is always one advantage I’m look ahead to from attending conferences. My personal attendance in the conference was supported by a generous grant from WSRI sponsors, so that as a young specialist this support is graciously appreciated and i also hope it will eventually continue to the next few years of the WebSci conference.
Total, it was, for me, a very good chance to present my own work and receive responses from a multi-disciplinary viewers. It is also, a forum of established persons in their fields which I include found incredibly stimulating. WebSci09 Trip Survey Ilaria Bordino I have been very glad to get given the chance to attend the first Web Technology Conference. We all believe that within the last few years the internet has really improved the life of everybody. Especially, it has altered the way in which we communicate and collaborate, disclosing possibilities that can not always be even imagined before.
The Web Science Research Initiative is promoting a joint work of several different scientific domains, with the aim of gaining an obvious comprehension of the fundamental issues that have to be dealt with in order to enhance the future design and style and use of the World Wide Web. This new Science is inherently multidisciplinary, as it needs to take into consideration different factors that actually ought to apply know-how derived from several fields, just like physics, computer system science and also social scientific research. The odd nature of the new Technology has made the participation with this conference a novel and great knowledge for me.
To begin with, I had the opportunity of appointment the great experts that are the founders of the Web Technology Initiative. It absolutely was really nice to fulfill people that have offered so great a contribution to the development of the Web and to tune in to their opinions and tips about the crucial issues that experts have to take into account when taking into consideration the future of the Web. The offered papers were very interesting since they spanned different issues from research areas much broader than the ones which i am used to see once taking part in normal Computer Technology conferences.
There was clearly a lot of interaction among computer researchers and interpersonal scientists. This is very important, because the WWW does not exist without the contribution of people and organizations. Significant parts of householder’s lives are now spent on the net in many countries. For instance , among the issues that were taken into consideration, there were online business, Social Sciences and e-learning, e-culture, Cybercrime, tagging systems. The researchers discussed a large number of problems that have got a critical importance for the so called on the net society, like openness and control, level of privacy and trust.
The conference also tackled issues regarding people’s behavior and determination on line. Yana Breindl Ph. D Candidate Information and Communication Savoir Department Universite Libre de Bruxelles Belgium Susan Revealed Administrator pertaining to the Web Science Research Effort School of Electronics and Computer Research University of Southampton UK April 20th, 2009 Subject matter: WebSci’09 Bursary Report To who it may concern, The Websci’09 conference was worth participating in. From the first day in, the program was of exceptional quality.
It had been a unique occasion for me being a Ph. Deb student to become high-standing audio system which turned into quite approachable as how big is the seminar was tiny enough to feel comfortable. The different panels were highly interesting and carressed upon many issues related to the World Wide Web. From the social sciences background, I discovered it incredibly stimulating to get in touch with a large number of scholars via various procedures and especially the pc sciences. In stages it was hard to discuss ones study objects in more depth.
The topics showed were incredibly wide-ranging as well as the lack of prevalent concepts and knowledge about the others’ procedures turned out to be quite a challenge as conversations risked to stay somewhat shallow. However , the conference made me more confident than ever that it can be very important to favor interdisciplinary research. The moment studying the internet, legal, politics, social, specialized and reliability issues have to be addressed. Because the web creates a unique web page for research, scholars from all areas need to consider how to treat its a large number of challenges.
From this sense, it could possibly have been much more interesting to organize methodological energy. Indeed, every participants could have benefited coming from a much deeper insight into just how other procedures study the WWW. It was extremely worthwhile to be element of such an committed project and I am pumped up about the next conference. Sincerely, Yana Breindl Report about WebSci’09 Conference Writer: Lucia Ciofi It is not all to easy to00 write a survey about a convention. A conference, certainly, it is not made only of presented paperwork and paper prints, which, by least, it is possible to read if you want due to on-line posting.
A conference delivers something the the extra value comes mainly from sensations and emotions believed during the happening. Let me remember then, which it has been thrilling to see such a gathering of many famous researchers, whose work is usually widely known and appreciated. Alongside it has been actually impressive to see the success in the conference among the list of students, since there was a huge number of them participating the convention, and it is easy to reckon how a idea to become a web science tecnistions is regarded as a desirable one.
What instead, from my standpoint, it has been hard to perceive throughout the conference, this can be a unitary eye-sight for the net Science. This is probably due to two facts: former, Web Research is still a incredibly young discipline and second one, their aim to stick to an interdisciplinary way it is extremely intricate to obtain. Then it is still difficult to find out a way of its own. Likely for this reason this software seemed to be a lttle bit fragmented which each �caille was not fully connected to each other.
Beside the lack of a common dialect across the numerous disciplines linked to Web Research makes challenging to understand the perspective of researchers that come via different ethnical backgrounds. Nevertheless the main goal of the meeting was to officially declare that discipline offers moved their first actions and it is forget about a project of some people, but that it has changed into a field of shared by many different research workers and this concentrate on has been fully reached.
So that concerns the choice of topics for the daily news sessions, apparently it has been paid more attention to social factors connected with the net and a bit less attention has been given to infrastructural aspects, for instance , only the program entitled “Web of data” was worried about technological developments connected with the net, but it could have been interesting to expand this topic. Again it must be difficult to find a proper harmony among several aspects resolved by this self-discipline.
On the other side the poster treatment has tried to solve these question however it has come a bit complicated for the high number of posters presented and the diverse research areas addressed. At last it could be worthy to make a representation about how an interdisciplinary approach may well be a dangerous way to follow inside the training of future net scientists, because it could result in having researchers that may have a rich ethnic background but that could not really master any particular location in order to carry out a proper research work as normally the one required nowadays.
Among the documents presented, I would remember the task “Semantic solutions for learning and educating in the web 2. 0 era” which has reported a clear brief summary about which are the current positions in Semantic Web field and its conceivable developments in the future. Beside it seems like important your time and effort spent planning to classify the latest technologies available, since there is also a lot of confusion in this area right now.
Another function really interesting, it has been the one entitled “Class associated structure derived from linked objects” which in turn identifies a possible model to explain the composition of RDF data posted on the web following a linked data principles. The ability to understand such a model is really important for the implementation of recent applications, mainly because it has been essential for the current internet, the research of the model of the information framework which allowed the birth of the famous Pagerank algorithm. Another work well worth mentioning may be the one entitled “Social meaning from the web: From Wittgenstein To look Engines”.
It will require the move from an ongoing discussion about the meaning in the URIs. The item debated is: from the point of view with the Semantic Web, the URI is a simple identifier without any meaning or it needs to convey a which means, as it is often used to identify different things in different conditions? The author feels that an URI has to s�quito a meaning but he can not satisfied together with the current ways to solve this matter. His thought then, should be to find the meaning of a URI through the which means that the community of users provides to this, and in order to reach this goal, he has studied the queries designed to a search engine.
The theory is good nonetheless it is possible to scale for a lot of URIs these kinds of approach? Inside the poster period I have liked the one titled “Towards a reference buildings for Semantic Web applications”. The purpose of this kind of work was to find common features which have been present in numerous semantic applications and using this analysis it is tried to define a common buildings, which could represent a mention of the develop computer software frameworks to be able to aid the implementation of semantic applications, an approach that currently is usually widely used pertaining to the development of common web applications.
Web Research 2009 Meeting Trip Survey. By Shankaron Gambi, Sheffield Hallam College or university. The Web science conference was the first ever meeting of its kind to be held and Athens was to make this one of the most unforgettable. Being saved in Athens First step toward the Hellenic World the conference featured a unique location that represented a electronic future and helped to share the conventions message in the webs electric power and its importance in our future world and everyday lives. The seminar was in all sides an actual success and easily met their key targets of linking the space between laptop science and social scientific research.
People coming from Psychology, Laptop science, Web design, Sociology, Beliefs and other exercises readily stuffed the meeting rooms, every presentation centering on a number of different aspects of the impact of the Internet on our lives. What was the majority of enjoyable relating to this was that persons genuinely looked interested in learning about the research getting carried out in several disciplines and lots of people just like myself used the seminar to help them shed light on different aspects of their own research.
The important thing emphasize from the conference-society online, really brought alive the value of learning the web coming from both a behavioural and technological perspective. Coming from a sociable psychological perspective I have extended thought that jointly such professions could offer informative answers to a lot of research concerns. I was already theorizing the a conclusion of my personal PhD which incorporate both spheres in the webs scientific and cultural aspects. A true highlight with the conference to me was the cartel session kept on Friday evening.
This is a emphasize for me not simply because I used to be presenting my own research within a poster nevertheless because of the prospect it offered people to positively ask questions about other analysts work and learn so much more about the work made in the very new discipline of internet science. I also achieved some very interesting people who got some very first ideas and who will no doubt go onto produce some very big contributions to the new discipline of web science. There is already discuss next year’s Web Science’s 2010 conference commencing.
I think that this conference will only develop and more well-known as the many years movement go on and possibly may include many other diverse exercises which is very exciting. We are in my last year of my PhD then and so plan to connect with present my personal research right now there. Overall, I truly enjoyed the conference. I feel that the conventions success was in its featuring the importance and significance the web is playing in changing the way in which people speak, socialize, function and generally live. Such an emphasis showed the positive power the web can have got on a large number of people’s far away and separating lives.
In such instances I believe which the power of the web has helped many people and contemporary society as a whole to reside a more linked way and has helped dissolve the loneliness and isolation in what would be a very disconnected offline world without it! you Web Technology 2009 Record Harry Halpin H. [email, protected] air conditioning unit. uk School of Informatics University of Edinburgh a couple of Buccleuch Place EH8 9LW Edinburgh Scotland, UK The Web Science 2009 conference was an astounding accomplishment, and I can simply give the briefest highlights.
In particular, I presented Edinburgh’s more traditional Informatics program, such as each of our over-subscribed info retrieval course, and received very useful responses on the latest work on Net Science subjects. One of the most privately productive lessons for me was the workshop in “Workshop in Understanding The Influence of the Internet on Scholarly Communication (UIWoSC). ” Stevan Harnad’s presentation, even above video, around the concept of the Web as “sky-writing” was of immense significance to my own, personal work, as he seems to be chasing similar suggestions but by a slightly dalam? erent perspective.
We apparently have a significant theoretical disagreement, as I was ultimately considering how “collective intelligence” forms in the form of a new relational theory of the home based on the ideas of Maturana and Deleuze, while he is keen on the Web being a form of exterior medium operating within a even more classical Lockean or Kantian cognitive construction. I also explained the role of W3C Incubator Groups in possibly standardizing a terminology for open linked bibliographic databases. From your various lessons, I found the paper about “On Calculating Expertise in Collaborative Marking Systems” by simply Yeung ain al. u be by simply to be incredibly relevant to my previous work with collaborative tagging systems. The biggest surprise I had developed was during the poster program, where a poster by Jeremy Smart, Rick Hendler, and others talked about just how my Ph. D. advisor, Andy Clark’s, philosophical evaluation on the Extended Mind could possibly be applied to the net. I had a truly fascinating chat with Jeremy Smart, and perhaps future collaboration could consequence. The invited talk by Noshir Company opened my own eyes to a totally new world of statistical generative versions for sites, and I described linked wide open data to him in many ways he really enjoyed over lunch.
The highlight from the conference for me was naturally my speak, in which I had the honor of having Tim Berners-Lee, Jim Hendler, and Nigel Shadbolt inside the audience. The talk travelled well, though it was dalam? cult for me to compress my personal entire Ph level. D. thesis into a fairly short discuss. Jim Hendler gave very excellent reviews about my personal sampling method and how I should make my sample even more representative of the Semantic Web. Tim Berners-Lee gave me an important hour or so of his time for you to give his feedback, and con? rmed in person much of the theses i was that attributed to him.
Lastly, Nigel Shadbolt described how his Ph. M. work was on a comparable topic, function that I was now checking out. WebSci’09 Trip Report Dork Karpf May well 21, 2009 The WebSci’09 conference turned out to be an excellent experience for me in most regards. Entering the seminar, I identified it because my initially opportunity to meet up with and interact with the international, cross-disciplinary net science community and an excellent opportunity to present my personal research and gain feedback from users of the various fields symbolized there. I can not become happier with how everything turned out.
From an early conversation on Friday evening with semantic internet developer Lynda Hardman to many excellent discussions with pupils and faculty on the Oxford Internet Institute, I actually built the framework so that I believe will probably be longtermproductive operating relationships. The presentation of my seminar paper, “Why Bowl By itself When You Can Flashmob the Basketball Alley? Ramifications of the Mobile Web for Online-Offline Standing Systems, ” was to a big and keen audience which in turn asked a lot of useful queries for further pursuit.
I am currently studying the convention paper pertaining to publication with Policy and Internet, among the conference cosponsoring journals. Keynote speeches simply by Tim Berners-Lee, Noshir Company, and Nigel Shadbolt had been particularly lighting up for me, attracting together subject areas in network theory, the semantic internet, and info mining in manners that got clear relevance to my own work in personal science. My spouse and i also specifically appreciated Sean Hendler’s enunciation during the keynote Friday night time that “we aren’t all from the same tribe. More than anything, what I took away from the conference was obviously a clear sense of what Web Technology is and what it just isn’t. Web Research isn’t a single discipline. It is a space where those aspects of the various exercises who talk about an interest in the web come together and interact with each other, “cross-pollinating, ” if you will. Individuals speeches, along with paperwork presented at the “Government” and “Legal” sections, were one of the most impactful personally as a scholar. As a whole, I had been extremely very happy to have went to WebSci’09 and was thankful for the generous bursary support which helped make the trip possible.
I am looking forward to subsequent year’s seminar and was already considering possible conventional paper topics. WebSci09 Trip Report Spyros Kotoulas I have joined the first WebSci conference in Athens, Greece. Generally, the conference was a cheerful mix of laptop scientists (especially SemWeb people), sociologists, legal representatives, philosophers, politicians, journalists and other disciplines which i failed to place. I think in which contributed to making a really interdisciplinary conference. The opening celebration was attended by approx. 000 people and the remaining conference simply by approx. 2 hundred , 300. The conference started using a workshop online science curricula. Researchers from various colleges presented fresh studies they have devised pertaining to Web Science. I think there were about five of purely web research curricula, plus some related ones. There was an extensive discussion regarding which exercises should be contained in a web scientific research curriculum. Some proposals, along with a spat supporting these people were: Humanities: We need to manage to examine and interpret options on the Web.
Linked data: It can be all about links and understanding what it is that individuals are talking about. Social scientific research: We need sociology to show us how the Web is changing the world. Additional proposals, that the discussion was not therefore clear in my experience were viewpoint, economics , business, art, humanities. However was effort to “throw” some of these disciplines out, that did not happen. Furthermore, the curricula shown did not consist of all of these professions. The starting event was meant for a much broader audience. Major greek policial figures joined. As a result, the audience was around. 1000 people.
The keynotes from Bernard Berners-Lee and Wendy Area were, as expected a bit of standard information about Net Science, suitable for a general viewers. They were followed by a very distinct keynote. The accent improved from that of any british Friend and a Dame to than of your person via Crete as well as the content from generally the Web to embedded systems: L. Sifakis (Turing award laureate) gave a chat about dependability and reliability of stuck systems, which has a bit specialized content. A keynote simply by N. Shadbolt was likewise about net science generally speaking. There a lot of talks/keynotes regarding trust, reliability and privacy.
The point was made that it is necessary for the Web. Some people were promoting that this should be done through legislation and some simply by system design. These speaks were generally interesting. There was in total 27 paper demonstrations in (mostly) 2 parallel sessions. The topics had been quite diverse, covering almost all aforementioned professions. I saw demonstrations on personal privacy, linked info, user cadre, sociology, law and more. All in all, there were worth it to read and only a few of them I could not follow. I should also remember that this was not the same for the non-comp. ci participants. I possess serious uncertainties that they could understand some of the more technological presentations. There were a 2, 5 hours poster treatment. Approx forty percent of the poster presenters did not show up in the conference, mainly from the non comp. sci. domains. I was showing a poster about MaRVIN. There was much interest for it. Namely, I used to be kept chatting for almost the whole session and i also barely experienced time to check out other posters. Admittedly, the eye was through the Sem. Net people. Analysts from other exercises shunned with fear coming from papers with very specialized content. several papers acknowledged for display , 16% acceptance level 115 recognized as cards , 75% acceptance price Ordered list of participation based on country (my individual approximation, they have shown a tag cloud): UK , There were various presentations from Southampton persons US Portugal Spain Netherlands All in all, it had been a very educational experience and it was really great looking at just how different disciplines fit together. Statement During the 18th and 20th of Mar 2009 I had developed the opportunity to enroll in and participate as a offer and as a new scientist with the WEB Science Conference: Contemporary society Online 2009.
The experience was unique and worthwhile. We attended the most interested in my opinion lectures and spend various hours during the poster session reading one of the most of the posters of the conference. As far as it concerns the lectures We attended the presentations of distinguished experts from around the world on problems that are related to my technological area and interests including Socio-Psychology from the Web. So far as it problems the posters I really was enthusiastic about the amount of them plus the multi-dimensionality of the issues that they covered.
I had the chance to keep notes helpful to my technological research, meet up with posters’ writers and have conversations about each of our common research interests. In addition , as I had expressed the willingness and I been selected to be with the organizing panel, I voluntarily offered my own help anytime and where ever there was a need during the prep months and through the three times of the meeting. This was an additional aspect of my participation to the conference and it was a very important and useful experience, an undoubtedly your life experience.
The conference firm phase gave me the opportunity to get to know and in depth many problems related to a scientific convention and research. Finally, as my study was chosen for the poster period I had the chance during the meeting and especially throughout the poster treatment to present to a lot of people and especially to people who where skilled researchers or academicians the task that had been made by me about these days and receive back again their remarks. Dialogues designed about the theme and content of my cartel and provided me a lots of material views, impressions, technological methods, foreseeable future implications) to be able to improve my work in long term. I find yourself with a conclusion which the WebScience Conference Society On the web 2009 was very good and as considerably as it worries my case it was a fantastic challenge and a experience I resided to the full. Sue Koutsonika Record It was my own great reverance to attend WebSci’09 in Athens, Greece in March. Firstly, I would like to thank Leslie Davies inside the Southampton University. Without her help, being a postgraduate scholar from China, We wouldn’t be capable of getting the bursary and manage my traveling expense.
As well, I want to bless you her colleague, Samantha Collins, for her reminding me of the report. I actually am actually sorry intended for the later of this report. It was an expensive trip. As soon as I peaceful from the moil in my initial oversea travel, I participated myself in enjoying the pretty view outside of the plane. The clouds over Beijing, the sea near the Combined Arab Emirates (where I actually changed my personal flight) as well as the mountains around the Athens were every very impressive. And of course, the Aegean Sea! It was so amazing! In the four days in the Greece, I lived in a youth resort near the Sigma Square.
Even though the conference was held in the Hellenic World, which usually located between your Piraeus and Athens, the metro was very convenience to go to the convention. In the fantastic conference, My spouse and i met with a large number of famous students such Bernard Berners-Lee and Joseph Sifakis, whose issues greatly attracted my interest. From the delivering presentations in the WWW Forum, That i knew of the latest advancements in the area of the net research. What was more thrilling was that my own poster attracted the interest of countless scholars. Simply by responding to the comments and explained my exploration to them, I make them understand deeper the situation in China.
?nternet site have just acknowledged a PhD admission in the Hong Kong City University, wherever I are supposed to continue my research on internet and its impact on world, I think this wonderful connection with attending a major international conference will make me even more sure of the topics which i should devote my period on.?nternet site mentioned within my bursary-application letter: this extravagant travel will undoubtedly be an amazing memory of me, an upcoming scholar: when justin was 24, he got his first English language paper released, and at the same time, it had been the first time this individual went in foreign countries to see one more world.
Wu Lingfei School of Writing and Connection, Peking University or college Jun. 12, 2009 REPORT ON WEB TECHNOLOGY 2009 CONVENTION: SOCIETY ON THE WEB 18-20 March 2009, Athens, Greece Day: 18 March 2009 The conference beginning with two half-day workshops: Second Web Technology Curriculum Workshop (WSCW2) seat by Doctor Catherine Pope, and Workshop on Comprehending the Impact with the Web in Scholarly Connection (UIWoSC) chair by Dr . Leslie Carr. The opening ceremony officiated by L. E. Chief executive of the Hellenic Republic, Doctor K. Papoulias. Welcome tackles were given simply by 3 additional important persons including Prof. Dame Wendy Hall.
Major keynotes had been given by Prof. Sir Bernard Berners-Lee and Prof. J. Sifakis. Prof. Sir Tim Berners-Lee provided talked about the idea of Web Scientific research by assessing it with human neuron in mind. WORLD WIDE WEB design could possibly be redesigned to replicate the neurons in human head. Social Networks intended for human must be nurtured and encouraged coming from all over the world exactly where web could be used for lots of benefits especially for humanity. The 2nd keynotes speaker talked about program design in software executive. Date: nineteen March 2009 The 1st keynote provided by Prof. Nigel Shadbolt emphasized on improving our information about the Web Science.
This individual talked about the dynamic of Web Science where it truly is for global used both in pc science or other fields, such as sociology, law and many others, by steering clear of the two traditions syndrome. The collaborative between all domains could boost creativity, engineering and science which will make new advancement and development, because collaborative innovations came from collective intelligents. The seminar followed with paper classes, and I attended the Trust and Mistrust session. First paper protected about reputation systems which explained regarding the collection size, web proxy and criteria for the systems.
Second paper was about recommendation program which suggest about subject or others with personalization. And previous paper mentioned the Devil’s long butt. Afterwards, I use attended the Legal Panel session the place that the discussed regarding data retention, law – between sensible and moral/ethical and shifting data through mobile devices. The 2nd keynote given by Jacques Shuttle bus, covered the principle of trust, several laws of identity and privacy including accountability, visibility, fair division of duties, support application and safeguard of personal world.
The convention followed with panel debate on Trust on the Web, conventional paper sessions of Tags and Search and posters session. Date: twenty March 2009 Starting with conventional paper session on Web of Data, protected papers upon Class connection structure, interpersonal meaning on the internet, interactive data access and new features to Wikipedia. The conference extended with conversation panel for the Cultural Convergence. The third keynote given by Noshir Contractor pointed out on Internet sites, based on Generative Mechanism regarding the questions and answers of 8 concerns on why do we create and sustain sites?.
Followed by even more paper sessions and finished with final ceremony. Written by: Miss Zurina Muda IAM, ECS, University or college of Southampton April 2009 WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE 2009 March 18-20, Athens – Greece Dade Nurjanah Learning Societies Research laboratory Electronics and Computer School University of Southampton [email, protected] soton. ac. uk The Web Scientific research describes the evolution from the web and systems on the web. The execution of devices is not only associated with technological factor systems but also social aspect. This one page record The Web Scientific research Conference 2009 held for Theatron, in Athens Greece, on March18-20, 2009.
The conference was excellent that numerous researchers of many fields joined the event and a lot of interdisciplinary documents and pages. All sessions conducted in English and the Poster period were superb. The seite an seite sessions We attended will be the ones which related to my personal PhD analysis: Learning and Teaching, Openness versus Control, Web of information and Lifestyle Online. The paragraphs under briefly sum up papers and poster presented in the World wide web Science Seminar 2009. Instructing and Learning. Nowadays, with the popularity of net and Web 2 . 0., learning devices has changed to open content program with growing courseware that support long term learning. Yet , Learning is not just about articles delivery. It must involve content, services and users, and considers three aspects of technological, methodological and organizational aspects. Deal with three aspects, semantic technology has given significant improvement to learning systems by adding a lot of information to content that both human being and devices can figure out, and also rendering reasoning systems which support adaptation and personalization of learning.
Furthermore to semantic technology, social networking aspects is promoting the paradigm of learning provided by study tools from adaptiveindividualized learning to personalized-collaborative learning. With this paradigm learning can be not a personal process between teacher and learner, but also sociable process that every learner can learn from various other learners. Collaborative Work, Understanding Sharing and Online Community. There are plenty of social systems that help social connection and collaborative work. One of them is Wikis that have altered authoring paradigm to community driven knowledge development.
This facilitates knowledge and content creation which is complicated, immense and collaborative competence. In addition , it leads to the development of online communities. Nevertheless , the social webs have trouble in managing content that always evolve, therefore causing complicated structure plus the difficulties to find information. Semantic technologies just like semantic annotation offer a way to overcome the challenge by building the content. We call the systems Semantic Wikis. On the other part of collaborative work, collaborative tagging supplies a way for managing and talking.
It allows user to find other research and researcher that are relevant to a particular domain. The relevancy of fields can be found from other cultural technologies like Friend Of any Friend (FOAF). This network can also result in the development of online communities. E-Commerce, e-Government, and e-Health. The web also gives effects to day to day life. Marketing which includes auctions, therapies, behavioral concours, culture and governmental responsibilities are some works harnessing the web. Some works in the areas applied intellectual aspects to enhance the result.
The implementations raise issues of policy and regulation, trust and distrust, security, control, and bandwidth capacity. WebScience 2009 18th – 20th March, Athens – Greece I had the opportunity to participate in the WebScience 2009 conference. It had been a very interesting experience: my first intercontinental conference. I met many people by various areas: from psychology to executive. The most interesting meeting was the WWW Discussion board, where I had the possibility to learn Time Berners-Lee, the father of HTTP technology.
For me, it was the first time We met somebody who has changed the ongoing future of the computer research. Moreover, I had formed the opportunity to consult with him and I found a very kind person, available to new suggestions. Apart from the WWW Forum, the conference experienced more interesting appointments. It started out with a workshop about the definition of an academic curriculum online Science: a head to head between different areas. Individuals started a great animated conversation about the possibility to develop a curriculum with psychological and sociological matters, besides informatics ones.
This kind of discussion allowed me to reflect of a point, today very popular in the community of research: the relationship between humanities and informatics. Just couple weeks ago, My spouse and i participated in another workshop, where participants attempted to a similar conversation. During next days, I attempted to every sessions regarding social network, socio-psychological aspects of the Web, Tag and Search. A few of presented documents were really interesting and gave me the possibility to know new aspects of problems that My spouse and i am studying for the research.
In particular, there was an article about a mathematic model to symbolize a typical online social network: the authors showed just how it is possible to formalize unstable behaviours. Another was about the measurement of user’s competence in tagging based search. The last the one which I want to speak about is a research to specify the feeling to be a part of a community, taking into consideration Facebook as one example. Another interesting meeting was the poster treatment. I found various interesting works related to my own research region and I attained authors for the comparison and an idea exchange.
In conclusion, I have to give thanks for the local business that allowed me to with the hotel and different useful information during the seminar. Moreover, I would like to congratulate the organization for the chosen location: I discovered a beautiful city that offered me a funny stay. At the end, I would like to give thanks towards the Web Research Research Effort that gave me the possibility to try and this really interesting workshop. I really hope to meet you soon also to participate together to long term conferences. Regards, Teresa Onorati Phd Student University Carlos III of Madrid
WebSci’09 – Trip Report Clare Owens, [email, protected] soton. ac. uk I had the privilege of attending WebSci’09, thanks to a bursary provided by the meeting organisers. The conference was obviously a wonderful event, and I believe that my attendance benefited me personally in various methods: An obvious significant point for me was the cartel session, wherever I offered my cartel on options for re-imagining interpersonal tools in new situations. During this treatment I chatted to various persons from a diverse range of qualification, including computer scientists, sociologists and a reporter from an THAT news firm.
Given this range of history, I received an evenly broad range of feedback by these people, that was highly useful – because was the connection with explaining my work to noncomputer experts. I likewise had the opportunity to meet and network numerous people during the conference. Of particular be aware is the interconnection I created with Lynda Hardman, head of the Online Information Access group for a school in Amsterdam. Lynda happens to be carrying out study somewhat related to my own, and i also hope to stay in contact with her and possibly work together in the future.
Of course , I also attended several paper lessons, which broadened my understanding of all things Internet Science. I was particularly in learning of work concerning perception of extremist activity online, this is of URIs (presented by simply Harry Halpin from the College or university of Edinburgh – we continued the discussion of his paper during the coffee period afterwards), SemWeb technologies to reinforce museum databases (this paper was by simply Lynda), and offloading cognition onto the net. In addition to the over, I was influenced by the different keynotes, especially those given by Harry Berners-Lee and Nosh Company.
Overall, the conference was awash with activity and energy, and the opportunity to satisfy and speak with people by such varied backgrounds was wonderful. I would really prefer to take this opportunity to appreciate the organisers for operating this event, as well as the scholarship program. Betty Purwandari’s Bursary Report Web Scientific research Conference Athens, Greece (18 – twenty March 2009) It was enormously great to attend the 1st World wide web Science Meeting, because it offered a unique experience to feel the true vibrant of your new given birth to Web Scientific research community.
The participants contains two diverse tribes. One was pc scientists, whom traditionally gathered in the World Wide Web conventions. Another group consisted of sociable scientists, attorneys, political experts, economists, and psychologists, who have studied the net from not technical perspective. In this report, I write some highlights about keynote speakers, interesting papers and posters, valuable contacts, recommendation for the 2nd Web Scientific research Conference, along with realization of lessons learnt from the conference.
Around the opening wedding ceremony, Prof D�esse Wendy Corridor spoke regarding the basic notion of Web Technology, plus standard goal from the conference. The lady emphasised a crucial issue in Net Science to build up a new technique, in order to predict potential cultural impact of the web, as well as to help all of us build more robust system. The girl said, “It is not just about the technology. It is about human behavior. ” Down the line, Prof Sir Tim Berners-Lee delivered an amazing speech. He mentioned two challenges in Web Science. Firstly, this individual mentioned the value to adjust the mobile world wide web to help less fortunate people in the developing globe.
Secondly, there was clearly a necessity to advance the web while links of information, not just as links of web pages. The very next day, Prof Nigel Shadbolt extensively explained the existence of Web Scientific research as a new or old willpower. And on the last day, Doctor Noshir Company impressively brought up some genuine data and examples in america, showing how social networking online related to conversation theories. Among conference papers, David Karpf’s paper (Why Bowl Exclusively When You Can Flashmob the �tambot Alley? ) was extremely closely related to my own research area.
It was about the impact of iPhones on a reputation program among US political figures. I have experienced conversation with Mr Karpf ([email, protected] upenn. edu), a PhD candidate in political scientific research from the College or university of Pa. He offered references to Thomas Valente’s and Everett Rogers’ documents about the diffusion of innovation. It may be used to forecast the impact of mobile web to rural people. There were also some interesting papers from the Oxford Internet Institute. Yet , they focused on the impact with the web about European Union countries, not to the developing community.
A discussion with Prof Sue Margetts says I should contact Prof Richard Heeks, from your Institute for Development Insurance plan and Supervision, University of Manchester (http://www. sed. gatwick. ac. uk/idpm/staff/heeks_richard. htm). It turned out that Prof Heeks would significant study on mobile phone for advancement. In addition , there were a very interesting poster in the Brazilian Commence for Internet Science Exploration. I had to hold contacting these people for upcoming cooperation. For the next Web Technology Conference, it might be better if all reveals are in English, to make all periods being even more inclusive.
In the event there are audio speakers who will use different languages, it could be very useful if the details about headphones and translation services is crafted clearly around the conference report. As a bottom line, it was greatly amazing playing talks coming from various specialists, getting involved in discussion with people from a combination of disciplines obtaining the same hobbies in the internet, as well as building networks intended for future collaboration. As a new web science tecnistions, I really hope to grow and mature while using new born Web Research community. WebSci’09: Society On the web?
Conference Trip Report Tag Schueler? Athens, Greece? 18th–20th March 2009 I was quite fortunate to go to the initial global World wide web Science convention, held at the Hellenic Ensemble in Athens last month. Attended by above 300 registrants and leading figures inside the Web world, it supplied an excellent perspective of current and forthcoming developments in the study of the Web’s technical and cultural dimensions. My spouse and i attended lessons on: Net Science Subjects Understanding the Effects of the Net on Scholarly Communication Trust and Distrust Legal Panel Openness or
Control Social support systems Cultural Affluence and Digital Technology I likewise heard keynotes by: Teacher Sir Tim Berners-Lee Professor Joseph Sifakis Professor Nigel Shadbolt Teacher Noshir Contractor I had the pleasure of meeting many people working in areas relevant to my work, which includes Pascal Jurgens, Shankaron Gambi, Peter Geczy, Wolf Richter, Chris Eckl, Dave Tarrant and Erik Cambria. We also achieved several individuals with key Internet credentials and broad standard interest, including Bebo Light, Daniel Weitzner, Jim Hendler, Ian Millard, Michalis Vafopoulos, and Thanassis Tiropanis.
The high point of the conference was Noshir Contractor’s talk, which ranged across the substance of contemporary, leading-edge developments in social uses of the World wide web. All considered, WebSci’09 supplied a broad-ranging view of all the latest in Web Scientific research. Despite some off-moments, the general experience was quite productive and I look ahead to attending this conference once again in the future. I had been able to find out about the state of the art of Web Scientific research. I met interesting members to the field, and learned more about current exploration and feasible opportunities intended for collaboration. Ultimately, WebSci’09 was quite a beneficial experience.
WebSci’09 Conference Trip Report Take advantage of Vesse Apr 2, 2009 1 Friday The Conference opened for the Wednesday night time with a group of Welcome Speeches and Keynotes by a selection of people. Wendy Hall gave a brief yet e? ective welcome and introduction to World wide web Science whilst Tim Berners-Lee gave a potted history of the Web leading up to the Semantic Web and Web Science as his Keynote. Josef Sifakis provided a keynote that covered remarkably tiny Web Research except for the closing couple of slides where he discussed the future of the Web of Things that this Semantic Internet and Ubiquitous Computing may well ultimately result in. Thursday Thursday night was in my estimation the best time of the Convention with a number of interesting paper sessions, a lot of excellent -panel sessions as well as the poster period. The day commenced with Nigel Shadbolt providing the keynote discussing Net Science as a whole before moving to the? rst paper treatment ‘Trust , Distrust’. This kind of session included an interesting paper presented simply by Kieron O’Hara on how the internet can aid (though certainly not create) extremism in faith [3].
I then attended the Legal Panel which in turn involved some intriguing discussions and fights regarding the EUs proposed ISP Data Preservation plans and exactly how this might a? ect the privacy and whether it takes to enter into force while law or not. Statistics regarding how little the authorities include actually applied this kind of data provided meals for thought about whether they can really justify it. Inside the afternoon My spouse and i missed the keynote to be able to sit in on an improvised panel organized by L’ensemble des Carr for a Skype period with Net Science Professionals students last Southampton.
The panel contains Nigel Shadbolt, Noshir Service provider, Helen Margetts and David Hendler addressing questions carried by the Professionals students regarding Web Science, I as well spoke brie? y towards the Masters learners to give them my thoughts of the starting Keynotes as well as the conference until now. Then I proceeded to attend the ‘Tags , Search’ conventional paper session by which I was specifically impressed by Yeung et al’s SPEAR formula for determining expertise in collaborative tagging system which will thwart the majority of existing spam attacks about these systems [4]. 1
In the evenings poster treatment I saw several interesting cards but most notable was Heitmann et al ‘s poster on a guide architecture intended for describing semantic web (SW) applications that was dependant on an evaluation of the framework of a wide array of existing SW applications [2]. This gives an easy way to gauge the completeness of virtually any SW program you build and review it to others. 3 Comes to an end On Friday morning We attended the ‘Web of Data’ paper session including Harry Halpin’s shortened type of the discuss he lately gave for Southampton in Social Which means on the Web [1].
This is of particular interest in my opinion since the issue of which means of URIs is possibly signi? can’t in my exploration. Afterwards there is a -panel session upon Cultural Convergence and Technology which I felt was a inadequate session, a Greek MP gave a unique opening conversation but the different speakers were poor. A pair of them were techno-phobes who also primarily moaned about the impact of the web on culture and the different simply desired to talk about the digital technology in theatre work she’d carried out which experienced no connection to the web.
After lunch Noshir Contractor gave the keynote which was extremely positive about the potential of Web Science and presented a small amount of some study that he and his collaborators are already undertaking on Social media in Massively Multi-player Online Games which has acquired some astonishing results. My spouse and i attended the ‘Life On-Line’ paper session in the afternoon which contained a couple of interesting papers on work getting conducted simply by other analysts at Southampton though practically nothing was straight relevant to my research. The Conference? ished with some shutting remarks by Wendy Corridor followed by a good speech by the Managing Overseer of the Convention centre which highlighted the centre’s long term history of ground breaking web and technology use to present cultural exhibits. 4 Conclusion Total the Seminar was very interesting together with the opportunity to speak to or listen to a wide variety of people, in particular all those from outside Computer Scientific research. We have an inclination to get wrapped up in the technology and it’s really fascinating to have a clear non-technical point of view on the web from people in other? elds.
The Convention also gave me the opportunity to become familiar with more of the people from Southampton who are involved with World wide web Science and gain a broader look at of the? eld as a whole. 2 References [1] Harry Halpin. Social that means on the web: From wittgenstein to look engines. In WebSci’09: Culture On-Line, 2009. [2] Dernier-n� Heitmann, Conor Hayes, and Eyal Oren. Towards a reference structures for applications leveraging semantic web technologies. In WebSci’09: Society On-Line, 2009. [3] Kieron O’Hara and David Stevens. The devil’s lengthy tail: Faith based moderation and extremism online.
In WebSci’09: Society Across the internet, 2009. [4] Ching Man Au Yeung, Michael Noll, Nicholas Gibbins, Christoph Meinel, and Nigel Shadbolt. About measuring competence in collaborative tagging devices. In WebSci’09: Society Across the internet, 2009. a few WebSci’09: Trip Report Patricia Victor The phone call for paperwork of this fresh conference quickly aroused my own interest, seeing that some of the key topics had been about trust, social networking and e-commerce – precisely what I am just working on. When ever reading the CFP again, I likewise noticed that it absolutely was not going to be a normal AI/CS meeting like I was used to, yet something completely di? lease, with people coming from all kinds of research areas. We only was required to look at the plan of the period in which I was presenting to view that this was your case without a doubt: the additional two loudspeakers had a background in sociology and personal sciences (and I think the biggest part of the open public too). It was certainly a unique opportunity to listen and learn from researchers in an area I was not familiar with, it brought along some di? culties for me, adapting myself to the publishing style plus the way of showing sociology-related speaks was not that easy.
The same contains for the organization of the period: personally, I actually don’t view the bene? to of delaying questions until after all speaks have? nished, then permitting people inquire all the questions at once, and only then simply allowing to deal with all of them (I’m more in favour of asking one question, in that case answering that question, in that case proceeding with the next 1, etc . ) But as well as that, the reveals in my treatment were really interesting and stimulating, and I learned some new issues that I de? nitely need to check out (Yelp, MoveOn, as well as the Smart Mobs book to get instance).
Naturally there were likewise other classes that I looked forward to. For instance the Tags and Search session, a topic linked to what I’m doing and which always contains exciting new work. Furthermore, to my pleasant surprise, a lot of the keynotes/talks were about trust, in its shapes. Specifically, Paul Spirakis’ talk was very interesting as they discussed many ways to evaluate trust, anything I’m taking care of myself. Through these reveals I came across a lot of new tips, and coming from Kai Rannenberg I found that you can do a lot while sitting on the toilet1.
Furthermore, I seriously enjoyed the WWW online community (except the long meet notes in Greek): I actually already got the opportunity when to hear Friend Tim Berners-Lee speaking, but this time he actually captured my attention for the whole duration of the speech: in no way technical, but an agreable talk about the genesis of the Internet and it’s long term consequences. Finally, overall, attending WebSci was obviously a completely new encounter for me, I have met a lot of interesting and nice people, the conference was well-organized, the foodstuff was delightful, and Athens was fabulous, and the climate too – well, by least a lot of the time2. The 2I Western Networked Washlet try to intercontinental fact that My spouse and i arrived placing wet with the Theatron the? rst evening, 1 MEETING TRIP SURVEY WebSci’09: Society On-Line Mar 18 , 11, 2009 At Athens, Greece Simply by Huan WANG Nanyang Scientific University To my understanding, this is the 1st international meeting specifically needed web researchers from different disciplines throughout the w
