Excerpt by Term Newspaper:
These aspects should be addressed for making it more beneficial.
Life Circuit Stage
Company life cycle is a strategy that “suggests that businesses are delivered, grow older and ultimately die. Business structure, leadership style, and administrative devices follow a expected pattern through stages in the life circuit. ” (Daft, 2009, s. 340). You will find four phases involved and they are generally Entrepreneurial level, collectivity level, formalization stage and decoration stage.
The EPA happens to be in the elaboration stage since it is mature, significant and bureaucratic. Daft has defined this kind of stage as “large and bureaucratic with extensive control systems, rules and types of procedures. Organization managers attempt to create a team orientation within the bureaucracy to prevent further more bureaucratization. Leading managers are concerned with building a complete corporation. ” (2009, p. 344). All these features correspond to the EPA in fact it is definitely from this stage.
Organizational Change
Just like any other business, the EPA is also undergoing changes by time to play a more powerful role in the protection of environment and human beings. Many employees inside an organization withstand change since they are used to a specific way of operating and they think scared and intimated to generate changes. It can be mostly the older workers who are resistant to change especially those associated with technology. The younger group, however, is always looking for ways and ways to prove their particular worth and advance within their career and they use company change as a potent platform to move up the ladder.
Firm Chart
The organization chart of EPA looks like this.
Based on this framework, we can infer that the EPA has many distinct bodies or perhaps organizations doing work under that. Though the general control vests with the EPA, each sub-organization has its own plan and set of administrators. They can be in effect persistent organization with periodic confirming to the EPA. This framework is highly democratic and partitioned.
New Framework
The existing composition is fragmented and it might be difficult to get the EPA to physical exercise the required levels of control over the sub-divisions. To make the entire corporation more effective, the EPA must have more control over the activities of its kid organizations and all sorts of them ought to work together towards achievement of its goals. In such a case, a centralized organization will work better without a lot of partitions. This will likewise make accountability easy and will prevent the blame from getting moved from one division to another.
The current structure is extremely chaotic and share rise to numerous internal conflicts and bureaucratic problems in the EPA. “At the local office level, enforcement tasks are generally divided among senior career detrimental servants who have head divisions that have responsibility for regulating matters in one specific environmental medium (air, water, harmful waste, etc . ) as well as regional advice. These officials report to several superior. On the other hand, they are all closely watched by relatively autonomous regional administrators, senior officials whose appointments and outlooks are usually influenced by simply state governors and environmental officials. inches (Mintz, 1995, p. 13). All these give rise to numerous bottlenecks and it is period the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY changes their structure possess a more powerful role around the changing global and political face of the 21st century.
Recommendations
Nadeau, Louis. (September, 1997). EPA efficiency at reducing the life long plant-level noncompliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Managing. Volume 34(1), Pages 54-78
Daft, Rich. (2009). Business Theory and Design. Author: Cengage Learning
Mintz, Joel. a. (1995). Enforcement on the EPA: High-stakes and hard choices. Publisher: University of Texas Press.
US Environmental
