Robert Elias’ book, “Victims Still”, presents a very questionable stance the fact that victims’ activity is, perhaps, not at all. Elias suggests that all the programs, laws and regulations, and establishments that have been made in the 1980s and 1990s have done next to nothing to help the victim. Elias also offers details as to the way the victims’ activity doesn’t support victims, the actual real reasons for crime will be, and how crime should be handled.
The victims’ movement that jumped up throughout the 1980s and early 1990s seemed to be a step in the right direction for helping the victims instead of the offenders. However , as indicated in “Victims Still”, this movement would not and have not helped the victim. The victim movements consisted of new legislation, organizations, and courses designed to help the victim. But when scrutinizing the policies, one the realises that many from the policies will be deceiving. Legal rights that are supposedly being given to the victim are just privileges that have been taken away from offenders only to improve the privileges of the officials.
Most of the programs made to help patients are selective when it comes to which usually victims it can help. For example , there are a few rehabilitation courses for medicine users that refuse to ingest pregnant women. Yet , when they have got a child that may be born addicted to drugs, they will be arrested to get child maltreatment. The selectiveness of the applications leads to the policies that, in essence, tend not to work.
The selectiveness from the programs connections in with why the criminal offense is out of control. According to Elias, cultural inequality, economic inequality, sexism, and racism are main reasons why crimes continue to be being dedicated. In order to stop crimes by happening, everybody needs to dropped equal to the other person. Hate offences are common against women and hispanics. However , if all people thought that all no one was better than anybody else was, crime, such as hate crimes, could decrease dramatically as could their victims.
Likewise suggested by Elias is the fact if regulations would concentrate on all subjects, not just people who were linked to a serious criminal offense, it is possible the fact that number of victims of serious criminal offenses would go down. The same idea would work intended for domestic misuse as well, whether it is handled the 1st time it happens, there would be a lesser potential for things increasing and your spouse to become victim.
However , in “Victims Still”, the crimes have previously taken place now the patient needs justice. As recommended by Elias, many victims do not wish revenge, they just desire the culprit to receive help that he or she requirements. There are many different methods for a victim to have claim in what occurs the culprit, such as sufferer opinions. Subjects may send in a statement or even talk directly to a assess at the sentencing. Elias feels that a victim’s statement should have something to do with the sentencing, yet that sentencing should suit the harm and not anybody. He as well feels that criminal fees and penalties should be reduced, because imprisonment only creates more criminal offense.
Most crucial Elias seems strongly resistant to the war on medicines. He seems that medicine wars trigger more criminal offense and more assault leading to more victims. And if victimless criminal offenses such as drug use, control, homosexuality, betting, and prostitution were legal, law enforcement may have more time to invest on much more serious crimes. The drug wars would become able to arrive to an end, reducing assault.
Total, I decided with Robert Elias’ thoughts on victim’s rights. Patients really do not have got any every time a close appearance is considered at the procedures. In theory they can be nice, yet things often look better on paper then in fact. I agree the only way to solve the condition of criminal offenses is to not apply push, but to understand and eliminate the causes of offense.
This guide was a superb eye opener to a new prospective of our felony justice system, and interested me within aspect of the system. I would suggest this book in front of large audiences who will be fascinated and curious about victimology and the privileges (or non-rights) of victims.