Excerpt by Research Daily news:
Actually despite the notice from Af m?rket Motolina, the encomienda program may have been slowed down, but it was not eradicated. Some of the plight in the Indian foule was not superior, and the manner in which the Spaniards continued to see the masse and their conditions, based typically on economical class and what individuals in question could offer, remained quite imperialistic.
In 1560, the Council of Huejotzingo published to Ruler Phillip 2 in the lavish diplomatic dialect traditionally applied between Aztec nations. Through this letter, the citizenry made sure that Phillip realized they had provided Cortes wonderful men every thing they necessary, but had been now confused because they were nothing but slaves. They end their plea with the term, “He [Cortez] told all of us many times he’d help us and could inform you of each of the ways in which all of us helped and served you But maybe, before you he forgot us, How then shall we speak? “
From a historiographical perspective, were fortunate to obtain this letter preserved. The letter from the Council of Huejotzingo to King Philip II in 1560 was obviously a masterpiece of rhetoric. Students have commented for the Aztec dialect being florid and this being rude to be immediate and to the point, and this notice shows that the Council is usually beseeching the King to lower taxes/tributes because of the previous help this region gave to Conquistador Cortes. Huejotzingo was an independent province prior to the introduction of the Spanish and this did not shell out tribute for the Aztec Disposition. However , the moment Cortes great men proven their electric power and intention, the Huejotzingo joined with the Tlaxcala to help overthrow the Mexica (Aztecs). There is very much subtlety through this letter, made to show that there is a difference in class structure and implying a nobleman should certainly treat people who helped his forces, within a kind fashion. Later on in the letter, it is asserted the city-state may be no more if they happen to be forced to spend tribute, anything they have never done.
The practicality with this letter displays two things: initially, that the foule, far from being totally subjugated since several historians assumed, felt that years after the fall of Montezuma we were holding still companions with the The spanish language. Second, like much to adhere to, the idea of taxation (tribute) without representation was repugnant to them. So , too, was the psychological war of terms: “O the lord sovereign king, we all rely on you as on God the on deity who dwells in bliss, we trust in you as our daddy. Take pity on us, have compassion with us. We all cannot publish here for the very many ways in which your metropolis is poor and stricken. About our anguish and poverty”
We might then admit a say of “discontinuous history, ” wafted on regarding the circumstances surrounding the conquest, or even more accurately, the assimilation of the native peoples. According to philosopher Michele Foucault, this kind of writing engenders empathy to get a cause and even more of a ethical and moral justification
