I have decided to compare and contrast a great episode of Davids Attenboroughs nature documented Planet Earth with this devised enjoy. I believe this comparison is acceptable as both equally texts address the same theme- observing and analysing particular animals in their natural environment- in different ways, though sharing some commonalities. Our perform is a parody of Attenboroughs documentary, a concept which is reflected in the contrasting styles of both the pieces.
Planet Earth has a naturalistic style, because Attenborough plays himself plus the animals are not aware the digital cameras presence, creating the naturalistic design by exhibiting real-life situations. In contrast, each of our play has an extremely non-naturalistic style, with stereotypical characters- including Davie Tattenborough, a personality who imitates and exaggerates Attenboroughs offering style to comic result. Stereotypes are being used in our play to overstate human idiosyncrasies for humor through the use of exaggerated gestures and facial movement.
The non-naturalistic style is used in our perform to create a comic effect whereas Planet Earth uses its naturalistic style to accurately reveal the lifestyle of any particular species. Therefore , the two styles of the texts reflect their different purposes. The 2 styles likewise reflect how our play is dropped whereas Attenboroughs documentary is usually classified like a nature program so therefore the programme can be not scripted in order to show the reality of the animals lives.
However , within just these different styles, the texts do share some similarities. Both pieces make use of direct talk about to the audience/camera from a presenter who does not often connect to the additional characters. Inside our play, the characters do not acknowledge the existence of Tattenborough till briefly inside the final field of the perform, and likewise in Planet Earth, the pets are usually unaware of Attenboroughs presence.
One of Attenboroughs documentaries, nevertheless , (aired around the 18th Feb 2007) comprised a rare example of Attenborough reaching the animals when he fished for a small reptile. This similarity really helps to establish the play as a pastiche of Planet Earth by simply immediately creating a character disconnected from the primary dramatic action, as Attenborough is in his documentary. Another way to establish this, which then creates another likeness between the two pieces, is definitely Tattenboroughs planned mockery of Attenboroughs performance.
An example of this is when in The world, Attenborough constantly hides lurking behind bushes to avoid being noticed by his subjects. Each of our play mimics this behavior as Tattenborough carries a little potted plant throughout the perform and hides behind it within an exaggerated method although it is apparent he would not really be concealed from the different characters. Consequently , the use of stage sets is similar in both items and the efficiency of Davie Tattenborough stocks many commonalities to that of David Attenborough in The world.
Another similarity between the two pieces is usually their framework. Our enjoy reflects the structure of Planet Earth by using scenes to represent aspects of a species lifestyle (such while mating traditions, courtship, hunting & gathering) just as Attenborough focuses on one aspect of a species lifestyle just before moving on the next. We deliberately used similar elements to those which usually Attenborough investigates so the viewers establishes the play like a parody, rendering more comedian opportunities.
However , although equally scenes are similar in composition, our enjoy is much short in length than the Planet Earth documentary- twenty a few minutes compared to 1 hour. The shorter length of our play makes the actions to be targeted and condensed to that of Planet Earth. This kind of condensed formatting helps to create the non-naturalistic style of the piece, nevertheless , as each scene is definitely brought to a climax quicker, heightening dramatic tension pertaining to the audience.
To conclude, both texts share similarities and differences as each of our play uses the same framework (with an identical dynamic among characters) to determine our enjoy as a parody of Planet Earth whilst the purposes of the pieces will be completely different. To achieve these different purposes, the play is known as a subverted type of The world, contrasting naturalism to non-naturalism and truth to scripted exaggeration intended for comic effect.
