Excerpt from Document Review:
The second article problems another aspect of click scam – the folks who perpetrate it. An example is a gentleman who attemptedto blackmail on the web giant Google because he had developed a software program that can supposedly bilk them out of millions of dollars with deceptive clicks on their GoogleAds Web sites. The author of the article notes, “Click fraud is definitely perpetrated in both computerized and individual ways. The most common method is the application of online automated programs, or ‘bots, ‘ set to simply click advertisers’ backlinks that are viewed on Web sites or listed in search queries” (Olsen 2004). The author records that many of the largest Internet sites, like Yahoo and google, employ groups of “fraud squads” who have actively try to find illegal advertising activity such as click scam, in an attempt to cope with the problem. Yet , since numerous fraudulent actions are situated in foreign countries, it is difficult if perhaps not difficult to catch all of them. Many advertisers right now know that this kind of activity is out there, and as the prior article remarks, many more are keeping a close watch issues statistics and challenging any kind of clicks they will suspect might be fraudulent.
Perhaps the most astonishing information in the following paragraphs is that many rival corporations engage in just click fraud against their opponents. The author cites two types of advertisers who have click on others ads to deplete all their marketing financial constraints and help to make their advertising and marketing less effective. These kinds of activity will be difficult to prove and correct, and it seems like an extremely underhanded way to do business.
The last article talks about a new sort of click scam that is very much harder to detect. It appears to reproduce information that shows the clicker can be legitimate, and in many cases that the click results in product sales, so the advertisers are satisfied it is a real click. This can be a complicated procedure that includes infecting a user’s computer system and popping-up a phony site that sends earnings to the perpetrator, even though the consumer is a valid customer spending cash at the vendor’s Web site. A Harvard Organization School professor uncovered the fraud early this year, and admits it is very difficult to monitor and eliminate. The scheme is also based upon agreements Google has with a few of it is advertising lovers, some of which the professor thinks should not continue partnering with Google, and Google appreciates that they have difficulties with some of the lovers who broker ads to sites that commit click fraud.
Many of these articles reveal the growing reliance for the Internet inside the population, and how that reliability has great and unwanted effects. The Internet is actually a wealth of info and understanding, but it can be a location intended for fraud, identity theft, and false information, as well.
Sources
Greenberg, Andy. “Google Confronts The Slickest Click Fraudulence Yet. inch Forbes. com. http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/12/google-click-fraud-tech-security-trafficsolar.html.
Develop, Brian and Elgin, Bill. “Click Fraudulence: The Dark Side of Internet advertising. ” Organization Week. 14-19.
Olsen, Stefanie. “Exposing Simply click Fraud. ” CNET Information. http://news.cnet.com/Exposing-click-fraud/2100-1024_3-5273078.html.
