Home » business and industrial » fairchild water technologies inc dissertation

Fairchild water technologies inc dissertation

My spouse and i. INTRODUCTION

Fairchild Water Systems was founded in 1980 simply by Eugene Fairchild. The company’s initial product was obviously a desalinator employed by mobile residence parks in Florida to take out salt via well normal water supplied to residents. Because the desalinator became an enormous success, the company expanded in the coastal region’s adjacent to you can actually headquarters in Tampa, California, and then to desert areas in the south west United States. Simply by 2002, that were there expanded their very own product lines to add desalinators, particle filters, ozonators, ion exchange resins, and purifiers.

Their products were generally priced more than their competition, but viewed to be remarkable in terms of efficiency and top quality.

In the year 2000, Fairchild Water Technologies was expected to include revenues of $400 mil, and around profit of $50 million. For the past five years, that they posted a 12 percent growth within their annual sales. In 1985, the company were able to start it is exports to Mexico, Belize, and later to water bottlers in Australia. By 1990, due to the quick growth in export product sales, the company established its International Division.

Sales inside the International Section grew to $140 , 000, 000 in 2150. About 50 % of Foreign sales originate from Latin and South America, $30 million from Europe, and $40 mil from To the south Asia and Australia.

In 1995, you�re able to send Frankfurt, Australia office pressured the need to develop and industry products that pinpoint consumer people. The initially idea was going to develop a residence water filtering. By later 1995, the company was able to develop two models that were designed in the U. S. and introduced in Germany, Biskupiec, poland, Hungary, Romania, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. The items were tremendously successful. However the quality of water in developing countries needed a purifier instead of filtration. Thus, at the end of 1999, firm executives initiated the development of a water purifier which was offered the brand identity “Delight”.

The Delight cleaner was able to remove “reasonable levels” of sediments, organic and inorganic chemicals, microbials, cysts, and annoying tastes and odors. Reasonable levels happen to be those referred to by a lot of World Overall health Organization (WHO) reports because appropriate for pasable waters. As well, engineers got repeatedly certain Mr. Chatterjee, the company’s worldwide liaison, that laboratory tests showed simply no product failing after 5, 000 several hours of continuous use. Chatterjee used his expertise in the Indian market to direct engineers in pursuing a “point of use” design instead of a “point of entry” design.

In addition, Chatterjee presented engineers with a recommendations including the ability to put in a small power supply that will action a electricity source in case there is power failing. Additional tips included to be able to add fluoride-based, vitamins, and flavors, movement rates, proportions, and storage capacity. Through consumer surveys, Chatterjee was able to decide a market choice for the countertop design over the wall- mount style.


Fairchild Water Technologies is seeking to enter the Indian Market inside the water cleaner product category. They have a new successful background in designing and marketing home purifiers in Western and To the south American Marketplaces. In this case, they can be trying to your market within a developing marketplace that is at the same time Liberalization. Consequently, they are facing multiple advertising issues that are critical for the success or failure of their product. Checklist of marketing issues includes this:

1 . Select to go without any admittance into the Indian market

2 . Enter the industry under a license agreement

three or more. Enter the market by utilizing a joint venture and a skimming pricing method

4. Enter the market with the use of a joint venture and a penetration prices method

Moreover to these primary marketing concerns, Fairchild Normal water Technologies had to decide whether or not they want to focus on urban areas or perhaps rural locations where the quality of drinking water is poorer and wherever 80% with the population lives. It was determined earlier that the company will forgo the rural opportunity for today, due to the not enough a much necessary infrastructure. Also, the company set up an approach to produce in India, where labor is much cheaper when compared to the Usa. However , the organization would importance few components that are critical for operations. Finally, it was advised that Fairchild should look for an American indian partner that is big enough to have a distribution and manufacturing system, but not too large where that commands the direction of the product line.


A. Buyer Habit

Many Indians emphasize the need for and increased water top quality. Newspapers, buyer advocates, govt officials, as well as the general public know about the poor quality of Indian water. The majority of Indians be forced to consumer this particular that is available to all of them. But , better educated, wealthier, and health conscious Indians had taken some procedures to improve the caliber of water that may be consumed by way of a families. It truly is estimated the quantity of such homes is around 45 million.

Health-conscious households act like middle- and upper-middle category households in the U. S i9000. and The european union. They cherish convenience and product variety, and consider consumption of material goods as a method to higher standard of living. Moreover, Chatterjee’s research suggests that product performance was significant consumers. Some product features that were mentioned include the capacity to remove sediments, bacteria and viruses, ability, safety, and foot produce space.

Cost was essential for market sections that boiled water, hard boiled and filtration systems, or simply filtered their very own water. The third most important factor was the ease of installation and service, along with design and appearance. The very least important factor was warranty plus the availability of loans. Finally, there was clearly an agreement of most segments that the purifier must have a warranty among 18 and 24 months, and also to perform between 5 and 10 years without the issues.

M Customer Segmentation

The Of india market could possibly be segmented by consumer’s capacity and motivation to use a water purification gadget. Research demonstrates there are forty million homes that include middle- and higher middle category families, that value top quality and a European / American lifestyle. Moreover there is an untapped market segment in the rural areas that have a need for normal water purifiers, tend to be either remote or don�t have the ways to buy a water cleanser.

C Competitive Market

Largely, Fairchild Normal water Technologies will probably be competing to get market share with companies that manufacture then sell water purifiers. But , additionally there is a need to treat competitive methods that are currently being used by health conscious Indian customers. For instance, fifty percent of the marketplace utilizes a regular method to purify water. A maid, prepare, or relative would boil two to five l of water, allow it to cool, and transfer the containers to a refrigerator.

Boiling water can be considered inexpensive, effective against hazardous bacteria, and ingrained in people’s practices. In fact , many consumers consider it to be more beneficial than any other product out there. However , boiling affected the tastiness of water to make it “flat”. Also, cooking was considered to become burdensome, time-consuming, and inadequate in taking away physical elements and distressing odors. 10 % of this target audience took another step and boiled normal water through “candle filters”, irrespective of knowing that recontamination could take place.

At the same time, regarding 40 percent of the marketplace used a mechanical device to improve the quality of water. Half of this kind of group utilized candle filtration systems because of their low cost and usability. The candle light filter is manufactured out of two storage units that sit on top of each and every other; the most notable container offers one or more porous ceramic cyl known as wax lights. Candle filter systems stored among 15 and 25 lt of drinking water and cost between Rs. 350 pertaining to small plastic models to Rs. 1, 90 for a significant stainless-steel unit. However , candle filter had been slow, essential cleaning, and needed candlestick replacement at least once per year.

50 % of consumers that work on improving the standard of their water use “water purifiers”, that happen to be considered to be more sophisticated than traditional candle filters. Water devices utilize 3 processing phases. First, sediments are removed, followed by odors and colors, and then bacteria and viruses. While Fairchild’s technicians were skeptical about the efficiency of the products, they agreed that they can be more helpful than candle filters. In fact , candle filters were proven to be ineffective in removing viruses and bacteria. Water devices were made coming from stainless steel and sold around Rs. a couple of, 000 and Rs. six, 000. Ten percent of the target audience did not employ any of these procedures and thought that their water quality was acceptable. Overall, Catterjee thought that 90 percent with the target market could possibly be induced to improve their current purification technique.

In addition to traditional drinking water purification strategies, it was decided that almost 100 firms competed intended for share in the Indian house water filtration and devices market. One of the most established drinking water purifier was Eureka Forbes, which was established in 1982 as being a joint venture between a Swedish company and an American indian company. The corporation marketed normal water purifiers, vacuum cleaners, mixers, and grinders. Aquaguard, the brand identity used for cleaners, was remarkably established and a lot of consumers mistakenly used it to relate to the entire product category. Aquaguard was your market leader, but its developing company experienced introduced a brand new product referred to as “Puresip” that used polyiodide resin instead of ultraviolet light to destroy bacteria and viruses, which in turn meant that water, could be stored for later use. Also, “Puresip” would not require virtually any electricity to use, but it was sold in little home appliance stores instead of a direct sales pressure. Aquaguard people paid approximately Rs. 5, 500, while Puresip sold for 2, 000. Puresip sales were growing at a much faster rate than Aquaguard.

Aquaguard was attached to a kitchen wall, and required plumbing and a two meter very long power supply. The unit would stop performing if power supply dropped to 190 v or reduce. The circulation rate used to be slower at one liter each minute, and had enough carbon to last only for one week. Aquaguard targeted homeowners that make a lot more than Rs. 75, 000 each year, and spent 11% of its sales revenues (Rs. 120 million) on sales activities; regarding Rs. 90 million had been spent on sales commissions, and about Rs. one particular million was spent on advertising and marketing. Eureka Forbes was well-established, had a extremely motivated and well been able sales force. Yet , they had limited reach in rural areas that presents 80% in the country’s population.

Another direct competitor is definitely Ion Exchange and its house water purifiers with the name brand ZERO-B (Zero-Bacteria). In 85, the company started to be a wholly owned or operated Indian organization, and it serves clients in a diverse group of sectors including cold weather power areas, fertilizers, refineries, textiles, vehicles, and residence water purifiers. Zero-B used a halogenated resin technology that was able to remove harmful particles, eliminated smells and preferences with co2, and murdered bacteria employing iodine. The unit stored 5 gallons or so of drinking water for eight hours with no risk of recontamination, and people paid Rs. a couple of, 000, nevertheless required a yearly replacing halogenated plant at Rs. 200. Chatterjee estimated the Zero-B acquired about seven percent market share, and lacked consumer awareness, experienced limited circulation, and limited advertising. There were rumors that Zero-B designed to implement door-to-door sales technique with an expected advertising expenditure of Rs. several million.

The next and most recent competitor to the Of india market was Singer, a subsidiary of the Singer Company situated in the United States. The organization provides a number of products to the Indian marketplace such as regular sewing machines, irons, mixers, toasters, and color televisions. The business had believed sales of around Rs. nine hundred million.

The Singer Business manufactured a home cleanser called “Aquarius”. The product people paid Rs. 5, 000, did not require any kind of electricity, had a single counter top model, a new flow price of 3. almost eight liters each minute, and a life span of 4 to 6 years. The product appeared impressive, in respect to Chatterjee, and was described as “state of the art” by a trade article. The resin utilized by Aquarius originated by NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) and was proven 100 % effective against bacteria and viruses. Aquarius had expected to sell 40, 000 models over the up coming two years. Singer’s distribution channels were better than competitors and included 210 company possessed showrooms positioned in major urban areas around the region. The product was also sold by a few, 000 self-employed dealers, who were supplied by 70 distributors. Vendors earned a margin of 12 percent of the price tag price, while dealers attained a perimeter of 5 percent.

Along numerous other goods, Zero-B and singer accounted for 60, 1000 units in sales to get the year 2000, while the staying 190, 1000 units were sold simply by Aquarius and Puresip.

At the SWOT

one particular Strengths

a. Proven track record in checking out and going into new markets

b. Excellent product top quality

c. Industry knowledge and ability to generate innovative products

2 . Disadvantages

a. Insufficient knowledge about the Indian industry

b. Significant segments available in the market live in remote control areas

c. Variable demands in the market, with respect to the city or perhaps metropolitan area

d. Lack of established production and distribution capabilities

a few. Opportunities

a. Return about assets in India uses 18% compared to 11% inside the U. S i9000. b. Low wages, and central position to wealthier South Asian Countries c. Liberalization trends in India and market expansion

d. There is no significant prominence by a single brand

four. Threats

a. Legal environment and expensive litigation

b. Many competitors

c. Several established brands with intensive knowledge about the Indian marketplace


A. Approach recommendation & decision

a. Select to forgo virtually any entry in the Indian industry


Prevent the risk of coming into the market in a developing nation, where there is still some concern about the extent of economic liberalization. Avoid competing with over 100 items that are available today in India. Expand marketplace presence in countries such as Mexico, Philippines, Poland, etc .


Go without the opportunity to offer products over 40 , 000, 000 households.

Shed the opportunity to have large income

Lose the opportunity to manufacture within a country in which labor is cheap

Limited industry presence in South Far eastern Asia, where majority of the world’s populace lives. Enhance market existence and manufacturer awareness.

w Enter the Of india market under a licensing agreement


Low capital purchase is required

Higher revenue and decrease amount of risk

Huge market potential and opportunities to grow in countryside areas


Limited control over the manufacturing and division process

Go without the potential of huge gains in exchange of a royalty fee

Limited exposure to the selling process in a developing market

Limited ability to make additional product lines

c Your Indian market through a joint venture and by using a skimming costs approach


Larger potential gains and a 50/50 split in profits

Ability to effect manufacturing and distribution strategies Ability to broaden into rural areas and increase manufacturing capacity Produce a market know-how for growing and developing economies


Requires a huge investment

Higher prices than competitors

Uncertainty of marketplaces in expanding countries

High competition

d Enter the Indian marketplace through a joint venture and by utilizing a penetration prices approach


Profits happen to be split between the two businesses

Ability to control manufacturing and division

Producing market with large potential

Higher margins and low manufacturing costs

Gain industry exposure and proximity to emerging financial systems


Needs a large capital investment

Uncertainty of developing markets

Reduced pricing strategy and lower contribution perimeter per unit sold Ability to find the right company to partner with

Recommended Course of action: Fairchild Drinking water Technologies should pursue a licensing contract with a great Indian firm.

B Objectives

a. Pursue a guard licensing and training agreement with the help of a partner that is able to sell at least 75, 500 per year n. Increase revenue by a small portion on an annual basis

C Target Market

The point markets to get Fairchild Water Technologies are the 40 mil households in India, which will cherish a comfortable, convenient, and healthy way of life, and are comparable in many elements to middle- and upper-middle class people in the U. S. and Europe. Also, Fairfield Water Technologies should target individuals who move by lower to middle class, as the Indian marketplace develops and continues to grow.

G Marketing Combine

a. Merchandise / Price Strategy

Fairchild Water Solutions should manufacture a portable cleanser that offers Indian consumers the convenience and performance of a top quality purifier. The purifier really should have a back up battery, a selling price of Rs. your five, 000, and a proven capacity to kill bacteria/viruses, fast stream rate, and enable for the capability of saving water without the risk of toxic contamination.

b. Division and Revenue

By getting into a license agreement, Fairchild Water Solutions decreases the amount of risk, but it has fewer control over the distribution and sales of its merchandise. Fairchild can seek somebody that is prepared and have the power to sell 75, 000 devices on an gross annual basis, having a 10% embrace the products sold for yearly. This approach could still ensure Fairchild Water Technologies several sizable income.

c. Marketing and Campaign

By selecting a licensing technique, Fairchild Drinking water Technologies would not commit alone into having an advertising budget. On the other hand, the licensee would be obliged to promote the product in order to meet the minimal quota to get annual product sales. This allows Fairchild to have an normal profit of 300 Rs without carrying out any methods into wages or marketing budget.

E Control Plan

The licensing contract would take up a language that guarantees Fairchild Normal water Technologies annual sales of 75, 500 units, having a 10% increase in units distributed thereafter. The agreement needs to have an opt out clause pertaining to both parties after three years, whilst holding the licensee to infringe around the technology and patent if they want to opt out in the agreement. Fairchild must monitor sales monthly, and carry out meetings in order to ensure that sales in the American indian market happen to be heading in the right direction.


< Prev post Next post >

Topic: Joint venture,

Words: 3272

Published: 01.23.20

Views: 173