As a counselor it is common to come across certain issues that make you question whether you are producing the right decision or not. Many advisors have strategies they use when faced with these kinds of challenges, but how does one particular decide which technique is fit on their behalf. Counselors need to make sound ethical decisions however often , determining the appropriate training course to take when ever confronted with hard ethical issues can be a challenge (Forester-Miller &Davis 2001). Moral decisions producing plays a major role in the counseling job, because the counselor becomes in charge of everything the client does ethically and lawfully.
Forester- Miller, Davis, and Corey have very similar decisions making models. Forester-Miller and Davis came up with a seven-step making decisions model that focused on the ethical trouble and the consequences that may happen while looking to work through it. The Steps are, discover the problem, affect the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics, determine the nature and dimensions of the dilemma, generate a potential intervention, consider potential consequences and determine an option, evaluate the selected course of action, and implement the course of action.
A team of licensed professional counselors had been surveyed in 2000 on what making decisions model they will preferred using when working with clients. sixty one. 9 percent of consultants chose the Forester-Mill and Davis’s model (Elwyn, Gray, & Clarke, 2000). It is clear that this style has evolved into one of the leading choices for counselors when coping with ethical concerns and consumers. Corey on the other hand came up with his decision making model based on 8-10 steps.
Discover the problem, identify the potential issues involved, review relevant honest guidelines, understand relaxant laws and regulations, obtain assessment, consider feasible and probably course of action, list consequences of the probable actions, decide on what appears to be the very best course of action. Investigator Vandecreek assumed that Corey’s model worked well best for customers who were completely invested in the counseling method (2006). He also thought that Corey’s model was most beneficial if the therapeutic marriage was strong.
Forester-Miller and Davis’s model and Corey’s model differ in many factors. Corey centers more on the client and exactly how they will be capable of adjust to the course of action chosen. This logic seems as if it will help the therapies relationship as the client is usually somewhat contained in the process. Forester-Miller and Davis on the hand focus even more on appropriateness and keeping the decision making method consistent coming from client to client (Knapp & VandeCreek, 2006). Additionally they focus on analyzing the consequences of both the potential and picked course of action.
Answering the inquiries that land below every single section of the models genuinely helps 1 decipher between which selections one should make. In the two models the early steps happen to be consistent with each other by first discovering the problem then relating the challenge to the Code of Values. Corey’s unit has a distinct section pertaining to obtaining consultation while Forester-Miller and Davis’s model included consultation with generating potential course of actions. Obtaining consultation is time consuming and prolongs the decision-making process nevertheless can be supportive when choosing the best course of action based on the customers needs.
I believe that both models could work hand and hand at any time, since they are comparable in articles. Choosing the best making decisions model intended for the client is very important. It is essential that counselor’s extensively research what course of action they will be taking. My own preferred type of choice is the Corey Style. Although the appointment portion of the model can be time consuming I really believe that it is imperative that you seek support from other folks that have even more experience you. Also the customer is the primary focus in the Corey unit, which I assume will be better for the therapeutic relationship in the long run.