Disaster of Julius Caesar
In the play Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, both of these characters Calpurnia and Decius try to persuade Caesar either in to continued your life, or into betrayal and death. Calpurnia had a perspective that Caesar would pass away if he went to United states senate. Opposing to Calpurnia’s fantasy, Decius guaranteed Caesar the crown if he went to Senate. Calpurnia had to support her debate with her appeal to ethos and her fear for Caesar’s life. She spoke by her cardiovascular, but was missing logic in her dream. Decius got advantage of her vision and knew that Caesar will not turn nearly anything down that guaranteed power, success, and wealth. Decius was able to persuade Caesar with alluring is placed and bad tactics.
Calpurnia used vivid detail and made good appeals to ethos to support her argument. Calpurnia’s credibility was established by her simply getting the better half of Caesar, one of the greatest males in Rome. She hoped to capture Caesar’s attention simply by warning him of the terrors she saw in her dreams. For example she lets us know, “A lioness hath whelped in the pavements, and pénible have yawned, and yielded up all their dead, Intense fiery players fought upon the cloud” (5-7). Caesar was inspired by Calpurnia’s dream, but it really was not enough to make Caesar stay home. Calpurnia concluded her argument to Caesar simply by stating, “Your wisdom is definitely consumed in confidence. Do not go forth today. Call it my fear” (29-30). Sadly, Calpurnia’s appeal to diathesis was not capable to affect Caesar. Being wedded to an over confident person, Calpurnia needs to have known that Caesar would not believe her. He had hardly any fears, this individual especially did not fear his death as they knew the God’s had control over it. Caesar was too certain of himself, and thus Decius took advantage of his arrogance. Decius’s motivation to get Caesar to visit Senate was based on his ethos. Having been a member of your group of conspirators, whose plan was to get rid of Caesar in Senate. Decius was able to change Caesar simply by turning everything in his wife’s dream right into a positive “This dream is amiss construed, it was a vision reasonable and fortunate” (45-46). Decius appeals to the ethos of Caesar. He knows that Caesar is money grubbing, and in a quest for eternal glory. Decius concluded his argument trying to explain to Caesar, “And know it at this point, the Senate have determined to give this very day a overhead to enormous Caesar. In the event you shall send them phrase you will not come, their minds may change” (56-58). The guarantees of prosperity and accomplishment were every Decius needed, in order to influence Caesar. Decius explains what Caesar will be missing if he stays at home. Decius uses cast because he appeals to the character of Caesar. This individual knows that Caesar is greedy, in search of glory, and trying to become a tale. Decius basically tells Caesar everything this individual wants to hear, and tricks him quickly in this way.
Both fights were solid, but in this situatio, Decius understood Caesar better. Calpurnia and Decius each had a close relationship with Caesar, and they were either capable of persuading Caesar. Caesar was neither scared nor mental, and as a result, Calpurnia’s emotional disagreement had very little effect on him. Decius was sure that Caesar would not reject anything that tends to make him prosperous or higher than the others. Decius was right, and in the end believing Decius’s lies might cost Caesar his existence.
