Excerpt from Article:
Diffusion of creativity theory refers to the pass on of tips, materials, or strategies and can be applied equally to counterterrorism policies or perhaps terrorist tactics themselves. By paying attention to the patterns of diffusion, governments can make more informed counterterrorism decisions or policies. As well, diffusion of innovation can present how terrorist tactics distributed from one group to another or how extremism spreads throughout a region.
Put on Boko Haram, the konzentrationsausgleich of development theory can present how terrorist tactics utilized by one extremist group spread or how extremist ideology spreads from a single region or group to a new. Likewise, durchmischung of development can help the us government of Nigeria better cultivate an informed and potentially evidence-based response coverage by adopting counterterrorism techniques used by various other nations in similar conditions. For example , Boushey (2012) reveals how open public policy innovative developments are dissipated. Punctuated balance is a way of diffusion by which feedback equally positive and negative shows future coverage choices. One more approach is always to use adoption capacity theory to show how certain elements influence a terrorist teams selection of tactics or tactics. Gilli Gilli (2014) show how terrorist groups transform their techniques depending on if targets will be hard or perhaps soft, and therefore are more likely to use suicide bombings when goals are hard.
Diffusion of innovation theory can be put on Boko Haram both by reviewing causal factors inside the choice to disrupt general public infrastructure and also applied to the Nigerian governments counterterrorism replies. However , the Nigerian govt has however to develop a cohesive enough counterterrorism coverage to render empirical exploration worthwhile and it could be even more sensible to pay attention to applying diffusion of innovation to Boko Haram to be able to better anticipate and therefore reduce the pass on of the groupings ideas and squelch it is ability to efficiently carry out terrorist attacks, as well as to emphasize many ways Boko Harams activities have disrupted the Nigerian economic system.
The method used for this study will probably be quantitative and quasi-experimental. A regression shift design or maybe a propensity score matching technique are both quasi-experimental design methods that can be used for this research since the research style may require the application of retrospective info related to the Nigerian economic system (White Sabarwal, 2014). A quasi-experimental style can also be used to examine the durchmischung of information, ideology, technology, and terrorist approaches throughout the location and inside radical Islam. It is also conceivable to examine the causal effects of radical insurgency on Boko Haram like a control group versus emerging terrorist organizations in other countries, or alternatively to examine the gear effects of revolutionary insurgency about various communities in Upper Nigeria. A quantitative, quasi-experimental design is a logical method to answer the study question linked to causes and effects of Boko Haram in order to better advise public plan, which can alone be driven by diffusion of innovation process just like those defined by Boushey (2012).
Exploration questions incorporate those related to the break down of the social contract, resulting in the patterns of behavior evident in terrorist companies (Osumah, 2013, p. 536). With a lack of cogent counterterrorism policy in Nigeria, you will find few mechanisms whereby Boko Haram could be effectively halted or a ways to stop the spreading of radicalism. By making use of diffusion of innovation theory in a quantitative study, it can be possible to influence Nigerian policy together with the ultimate objective of preventing Boko Haram. Boushey (2012) shows just how