Mark Twain, through a weighty dose of satire, irony, and a not-so-subtle attempt for the medical method, gives readers with an effective, yet flawed, debate as to why human beings are the least expensive of animals in his article The Damned Human Race. As the essay works in rendering facts that support Twain’s claim of humans have descended from animals, but not the other way around, his bias and pessimism towards the human race in general strongly emanates from the article, and he does not provide any chance for the reader to collect any proof to the opposite of his beliefs, further more limiting the legitimacy of his debate.
Twain gives several sound reasons for saying that individuals are worse than pets or animals, all presented in an effective manner.
This individual makes basic definitive claims which are generally believed to be true of humans and not animals, and elaborates on these statements to pinpoint just what is wrong with human beings. For example , Twain says “Man may be the only Patriot (Twain). While most believe this to be a great trait of humans, Twain immediately uses this assertion by saying that humans are the only species to kill the other person for their countries, writing: Gentleman is the only Patriot.
He sets himself apart in his own country, under his own flag, and sneers at the additional nations, and keeps multitudinous uniformed assassins on hand at heavy expenditure to grab pieces of other people’s countries, and maintain them by grabbing slices of his. And in the intervals between campaigns he washes blood off his hands and works intended for the widespread brotherhood of man, along with his mouth.
(Twain) Twain visits on to explain that humans are the just species that take slaves, are the only species to take more than they require, and the just species that claim made use of, and provides certain examples of several types of animals performing differently in this regard (Twain). His points work well arguments because he uses details and solid language to solidify each point that he makes, and does therefore in a way that leaves little intended for argument.
Even though the points that Mark Twain makes in his essay happen to be for all intents and purposes the case, and he conveys his beliefs in a really effective fashion, the dissertation as a whole is usually not a effective argument, typically because he primarily uses just one of the three main method of persuasion. Twain provides details throughout his essay that are generally hard to argue with in regards for the bad issues that humans are capable of that animals are generally not, but does not use feeling to bring about a response through the reader.
This could be by design because of his use of large satire, as well as the fact that this was written within a scientific fashion rather, which generally happen to be written to not contain the author’s emotions. There exists a clear lack of ethical appeal, or cast, in Twain’s essay because of the fact that he could be writing this kind of in an recognized scientific ability, though he can clearly not only a scientist. He also would not provide information that may contradict his values, which prohibits the reader coming from gathering other views in the story.
Twain could have quickly provided details and disputes that point out your good things that human beings are equipped for that family pets are not, such as charities, interpersonal welfare programs, and medical treatment. With that said, The Damned People is an essay that contain heavy satire, something that Twain makes noticeable almost right away by stating “I never have guessed or speculated or perhaps conjectured, but they have used precisely what is commonly known as the scientific method (Twain).
By the time that essay was published in 1905, Twain was an existing as a popular author, known for his wit and popular works rather than scientific ability. Also, now in his lifestyle, Twain was also very available about his overall disdain for the human race generally speaking, perhaps due to circumstances concerning his family and life experiences, though it is often debated that Twain experienced no more of any troubled life than most traditional people (Byrne 19).
Most of these things forbid his essay from being considered a legitimate argument, and points to it being even more a rant by the creator, however effective it may be. Although Mark Twain provides various solid details of the human competition that are the case and should end up being noted by reader, the heavy doses of very clear bias and satire overwhelm any legitimacy the essay could possibly carry. It is also difficult to ignore the cynicism throughout the piece, even within the last line once Twain can be describing your races declension from pets or animals, stating, “Below us, nothing (Twain).